Trying to figure out why this year's Swine Flu is such an attractive Shared Lie. All the bulls and bears, all the Rs and Ds, all the "independent" "leftists" and Populists, are sharing in the panic.
Generic flu is just flu. It kills thousands of people every day, but it's not a brand so we can't talk about it.
Covex 19XP2™ or whatever is a BRAND. Covex 19XP2™ or whatever kills DOZENS of people every day, which is MUCH MORE than the thousands killed by ordinary generic unmarked flu. These dozens of people COUNT because they're killed by a BRAND.
It's like taxis vs Uber™. Generic taxis are just taxis. They carry millions of people every day, but taxis aren't a brand so they don't count. Uber™ is a brand. It has huge advantages over plain generic taxis. You can call a taxi by landline or iPhone, but you can ONLY call Uber™ with an iPhone. This is an advantage because it EXCLUDES uncool landline users.
I was playing with my Great Smith set, and noticed a bit of logic or evidence that I hadn't taken into account before.
In the first decade of autos, American cars continued our French-influenced habit of driving on the right side of the street, and the steering wheel was also on the right. The Ford T started the transition to left steering, but the transition was slow. Some expensive cars were still right-wheeled in 1920.
Earlier I had tried to think about our road chirality, but missed this point.
= = = = = START PARTIAL REPRINT:
[The cited article] quotes a Wikipedia explanation for America's right-hand driving habit. The explanation seems to have appeared first in Popular Science in 1925.
Then the balance of power shifted. In the United States, wagons were increasingly common on the roads. Drawn by up to 20 animals, they were a popular way of transporting goods over long distances – and the men helming these vehicles liked to drive on the right. They’d sit on the rear leftmost horse, so it was easier to make sure oncoming traffic didn’t get too close if it was also on the left.
There wasn’t any arguing with the momentum of 20 1,000-pound (453kg) horses. Other road traffic quickly got used to driving on the right and the rule stuck. Hundreds of years on, right-side driving is irreversibly embedded in US street design.
Supposedly some drivers of Conestoga wagons formed a national habit. I can't prove this one wrong, but a tendency among some long-distance freighters seems unlikely to set a habit for city streets.
In France, traditionally foot traffic had kept right, while carriage traffic kept left. Following the French Revolution, all traffic kept right.
The first keep-right law for driving in the United States was passed in 1792 and applied to the Philadelphia and Lancaster Turnpike. New York formalized RHT in 1804, New Jersey in 1813 and Massachusetts in 1821.
Note the dates. We were consciously following French trends and erasing British tendencies after the Revolution.
= = = = = END PARTIAL REPRINT
I was using the pre-existing French habit to disprove the Popular Science logic. Our first automobiles were a much more decisive disproof. If we had formed our habits from the left-horse drivers of Conestogas, we would have placed the steering wheel on the left horse immediately and consistently. But we didn't. We began with the driver on the right horse, and gradually changed to the left horse over 20 years.
More broadly, the driving position doesn't seem to matter much. There are advantages both ways, and the outside position has more advantages. Driving near the centerline makes it easier to pull out for a pass. Driving on the outside makes it easier to see pedestrians and parked cars, and easier to see the edge of the road. We think of driving on the outside as strange, but we do it all the time in the left lane of one-way streets and divided highways.
Double byebye, BernieBernard just moved from the useless idiot category to the active genocidal monster category.
Democratic presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders has condemned Russia for its reported attempts to help his campaign, telling it to "stay out of American elections".
Mr Sanders said on Friday that US officials had told him last month about Russian efforts to aid his campaign. Speaking in Bakersfield, California, Mr Sanders said it was not clear how Russia intended to interfere. But the Vermont senator, 78, said he strongly opposed any attempts to do so.
He denounced Russian President Vladimir Putin as an "autocratic thug" whose government has "used internet propaganda to sow division in our country".
Pure servant of Soros, pure abject slave of Hillary, pure Satan.
Come to think of it, he pulled the same trick last time. After pretending to run against Hillary, he campaigned enthusiastically for Hillary. I guess it's just the old Shared Lie trick. Generate a fake argument, R versus D or Bulls versus Bears, with "both" "sides" working in evil harmony to boost the same satanic variable.
Constants and Variables 146, Anglosphere edition
When Turley isn't simply boosting faker Trump, he can be interesting. His latest clip discusses Boris's speedy but cautious adoption of Populist principles. Boris is copying Canada and Australia with his quality-based immigration proposal. Immigration should ONLY fill in jobs that don't force wages down.
Constants and variables:
Variable: Australia and Canada have a functional parliament which can create real political shifts. Most of the time the governments are globalist, but not always. Manweller doesn't apply there. Elections count.
Constant: Their Populist immigration policy has remained steady despite the shifts and despite the dominant tendency toward Soros.
US immigration policy is the opposite, but we don't have any variables. Our "parties" are identical and Manweller is firmly in control. Elections never change anything. All politicians are Soros, and immigration is permanently Soros. The sole purpose of immigration is to kill working-class Americans.
Until this year Britain was more like America. All politicians were the same, all were Soros, immigration was Soros. Boris has broken Manweller's Rule by implementing Brexit, and now he's breaking some of the globalist tendencies. He's rejoining the Anglosphere.
Meanwhile in good old ZERO TAX ZERO TAX ZERO TAX land.....
At the state level, idiot Repooflicans continue saying only one thing:
ZERO TAX ZERO TAX ZERO TAX
and doing nothing at all to solve real problems.
An email update from State Rep Jenny Graham:
The Economic and Revenue Forecast Council issued its updated state revenue forecast for the quarter this week. With the strong state economy and a real estate market that is very active, the state is expected to receive hundreds of millions of dollars in new revenue over the next two years. Because more people have jobs – at higher wages – less people are seeking state services. Combined, this means the state is looking at a budget surplus of about $2.4 billion over the next few years!
Well, that's GOOD. A state or a nation or a company or a household is OBLIGATED to save money in the good times so we can spend it in the bad times. God says so, and every responsible moral code and pre-Goldman economic rule agrees. Even Keynes agrees.
Do Repooflicans agree?
I believe the state should give some of this money back to taxpayers. We have legislation to fully fund the $30 car tab initiative passed by voters last November. We should also substantially cut the state portion of the property tax. Homeowners are seeing property valuations go up, which is causing a noticeable spike in property taxes.
No. Repooflicans want us to voluntarily reduce our income so we can go back to living on credit and enriching the bankers.
This is immoral and crazy.
¶ 3:10 PM
Retreating into formalism
The "election" "ballot" arrived in the mail yesterday. I normally "vote" for amusing non-serious candidates like Goodspaceguy. This time I "marked" the box for Tulsi, even though she's neither amusing nor serious.
Why? Bare formalism.
Manweller and Parkinson are the only laws. Elections are never allowed to count, and bureaucracies continue growing and killing regardless of purpose and feedback. The entire system is a dead and deadly machine, grinding and growling and shooting in all directions.
When you know all gestures are deprived of meaning and consequence, you can at least make the gesture. I've registered the fact that one of the people who received the "ballot" in this area wanted to register the fact of "marking" a box advertised as "anti-war".
Undoubtedly a dumb question.
When I switched back to vegy diet in 2010, I decided to use barley instead of rice as the 'base'. It's more nutritious and less starchy than rice. I've been buying Safeway's house brand Signature barley ever since, and the product has always been consistent.
Last month Safeway switched brands to Goya. I didn't think a commodity like barley could be different, but this is different. The grains are half the size, and they cook up with a lot more starch and less taste. Most of the grains are missing the structure of a barley grain.
With the house brand, all of the grains looked like barley when dry, and looked like fatter barley when cooked. With Goya, all of the grains are little unmarked white things when dry, and a few of them end up looking like barley when cooked.
I don't understand the difference. Maybe the Goya is milled longer, taking off more of the grain? At any rate it's less satisfying and possibly less nutritious.
I'll look in the 'organic' aisle and see if they still have unshrunk barley there.
Will be interesting
Apparently an "unknown number" of Swine Flu cases have been transported to Spokane via high-security military aircraft. They may be from one of the idiot cruise ships**. It's no big deal here; I didn't know about it until I read it in one of the NYC stock demon twits.
Shorts and longs, all paid by the same master, working together to drive the "economy" ever upward.
It will be interesting to see if there's any response here, any masks or panic.
There won't be any response in this neighborhood. No snowflakes here. Hump up and take it types. Working-class whites, old vets, Russian emigres, Injuns, blacks. The snowflakes are in Browne's Addition and the new Kendall Yards 'urban haven'.
I'm more worried about the response by schizies. A certain type of schizy feels the need to participate in Official Terrorist Events. Sacred Heart has the isolation unit where the Swine Flu patients are arriving, and (I think) Sacred Heart also has a psych ward with occasionally troublesome schizies.
= = = = =
** Cruise ships are ALWAYS virus incubators. Many cruises are halted when a stomach virus takes over. I can't BEGIN to understand why anyone would want to spend thousands of dollars to mingle with thousands of idiots, all pretending to have fun, inviting all sorts of trouble. Hurricanes, diseases, pirates, capsizing. Nature takes revenge on such idiots. Unfortunately the rest of us end up paying for the revenge.
= = = = =
Later after the usual store trip: Yup. As predicted, no panic, no masks, no conversation about flu. People sneezing and coughing as usual without covering mouth, nobody worrying about it.
Equally predictably, the demon media are doing their genocidal job of creating panic and chaos and crime:
= = = = =
Next day: Yup, here we go with the schizies!
Erdogan is fucking crazy
It's discouraging to watch a leader who once had a firm grasp on reality descend into self-destructive craziness.
Turkey has been playing US against Russia for many decades. The coquette routine works when you're offering favors in return for favors. It doesn't work in the current situation.
Erdogan has inserted himself BETWEEN Russia and USA in Syria, fighting AGAINST both sides. And now he wants USA and Russia to give him more weapons so he can fight AGAINST both sides.
This is like parachuting into Normandy on D-Day and shooting both ways at once, then asking FDR and Hitler for more bullets to shoot more American and Kraut soldiers.
Crazy beyond crazy beyond crazy.
Sanders midway through took umbrage at Bloomberg for implying Bernie was a communist or, perish the thought, that socialism often leads to the totalitarian curse of communism.
“Let’s talk about Democratic Socialism. Not communism, Mr. Bloomberg. That’s a cheap shot. Let’s talk about what goes on in countries like Denmark, where Pete correctly pointed out; they have a much higher quality of life …We have socialism for the very rich. Rugged individualism for the poor,” Sanders stated, ripping into Bloomberg.
Sanders called it a “cheap shot.” It wasn’t. It was the truth.
No, it's not the truth. I don't feel like defending Bernie in general, but he's exactly right on all questions of socialism and communism. Soft socialism never leads to Soviet communism.
Soviet communism succeeded in countries where capitalism or feudalism had failed. Soviet communism DIDN'T succeed in countries where soft socialism was already in control. Socialism is a vaccine against Stalinism. FDR understood this point thoroughly.
¶ 6:55 AM
The city of Spokane is reminding drivers not to leave their cars warming up in the driveway. Open invitation to theft. Oddly, the picture they use is a car that was never imported to the US, a mid-60s British Ford Cortina. The car is LHD, so presumably it was Canadian.
Maybe not so odd. They caught MY attention and kept it! Would it work as well for a normal viewer who isn't a fan of weird old cars?
¶ 6:10 AM
Not taking his or her own advice
From a "study" on scientific communication, aimed at killing the maximum number of Climate Denialists and Xenophobes and Vaccine Denialists:
Study participants tested the theory by completing a 19-question survey on authenticity. Survey questions were based on a description of published plant science research and a group of randomly assigned narrative messages attempting to explain that research. The group of messages included a story drawn from the real-life experiences of J. Chris Pires of how he became interested in plant science. Pires is a Curators Distinguished Professor in the Division of Biological Sciences in the MU College of Arts and Science, and an investigator in the Christopher S. Bond Life Sciences Center.
Researchers found that if a scientist shares the story of the development of the origin of his or her interest in the subject through a first-person narrative -- without use of institutional affiliations -- people are more inclined to perceive him or her as authentic.
The overall point is unquestionably true. When I see an expert introduced with a 200-word list of his Named Chairs and Directorships of Centres, I stop reading.
The introduction of Pires fails to learn the lesson of the "study".
First-person narrative isn't especially important. Impersonal objective style is fine as long as you keep it clear and uncluttered. No PC locutions, no grammarrhoid sentence structures.
= = = = =
A bit later, via Eurekalert, here's a scientific press release that gets everything right for clear communication.
New research takes p*** out of incontinence
Best headline of the year. The article gets to the point, skips the 200-word CV for the researchers, explains the problem, and describes the limits and potentials of the solution. No obligatory mention of Climate Emergency, no obligatory mention of Evolution. Just the facts.
The explanation is so clear that it answered a question I'd been wondering about for years. After age 50 I started having short pee intervals, and assumed it was just prostate. I took some supplements for prostate, but they didn't help. At age 60 I finally got blood pressure under control, and the peeing problem disappeared. The article tells why: High blood pressure swells up all tissues, including the tissues of the bladder. Less room for urine inside. Simple.
There's a new and pointless "debate" about eugenics, apparently started by Universal Idiot Dawkins.
Pointless because the "debate" is happening in Sorosian countries where the governments have already decided the question. At the leading edge of Sorosia, in places like California and Belgium and UK, eugenics is solidly allowed and moving fast toward required.
The non-Soros countries, led by Russia, are moving fast in the other direction.
Eugenics is just one of many symptoms of Sorositis. Arguing against it is like trying to affect the natural weather cycle by restricting CO2. Wrong end of the process.
The question under "debate" is:
How many oddballs should we kill?
= = = = =
As always, "Robust Debates" are auctions where both "sides" bid up the kill count.
The religious "side" says we should only kill some oddballs as a first step. The Dawkins "side" says we should kill more than all oddballs immediately.
Here's the real question:
Do we want civilization or not?
= = = = =
Civilization, as defined by God, makes places for all sorts of productive talents and tastes and tendencies, but punishes or eliminates people who persistently attack and kill others.
Eugenics is NOT about eliminating killers. The backers of eugenics are EXPLICITLY against punishing professional criminals.
How do we make civilization? How do we make places where many types of non-destructive people can be useful? First we need to have lots of PLACES. Separate places. Modularity. Sovereign countries, semi-sovereign provinces and cities, separated neighborhoods, businesses that can operate solely in separated neighborhoods without predation from globalized monsters.
The non-Soros side of the world is moving toward sovereignty at all levels, and trying to block globalized monsters.
Elon's five-star restaurant
The TeslaCharts podcast is turning out to be a good listen, mainly because of the male and female cohosts. Most radio shows in recent decades are all-male for obvious reasons.
The latest one features 'Machine Planet', the commentator I mentioned yesterday with a slight quibble.
Usually the personality revealed in a podcast is less interesting than the personality shown in blogs or Twitter. Introverts! In this case it's the other way around. 'Machine Planet' sounds sort of numberoid and accountantish in print, but lively and extroverted in voice.
Lots of good thoughts in the podcast. The best was by cohost 'Georgia'. Discussing the immense trash piles and waste visible in all Tesla plants, which would NEVER BE ALLOWED in any other factory anywhere, 'Georgia' made a sharp comparison.
Super-rich fuckhead investors pour money into "environmentalist" Elon without noticing the trash and waste and pollution. The same super-rich fuckheads eat in five-star nouveau cuisine restaurants without noticing that the ingredients are old and spoiled, and the kitchens are rat-infested fire hazards. Symbolic status is EVERYTHING for rich fuckheads.
Elon's trash piles would NEVER BE ALLOWED by state and federal agencies, and even before those agencies existed, the trash would NEVER BE ALLOWED by efficient manufacturers. Carmakers have always been super-careful to minimize waste and maximize REAL recycling. Every stage of forging, pressing, cutting, welding, and assembly is designed from the start to leave nothing behind. All raw material and all labor is accounted for. Elon violates all the established rules of manufacturing and still pulls in billions from investors who like to talk about "efficient markets". Elon violates all the environmental and safety laws established long before Gaia, and never gets punished or regulated by the agencies or the Gaia-worshiping investors.
When you have Epstein connections, you have absolute power. Blackmail conquers the universe.
Speaking of standardization....
Several months ago I "built" some semaphore towers and semaphore equipment. Now I'm making acetylene stuff, including a couple of lighthouses.
The Russian semaphore tower was built in 1858 by the Russian military under Nicholas 1. I used a sketch as guidance.
The Chumbe lighthouse was built in 1904 in the British colony of Zanzibar, presumably by British military contractors. It still exists, so I was able to use clear photos for guidance.
I always like to include some interior pieces in these buildings for completeness. If an artist wants to make an adventurous picture, his characters should be able to reach the top of a tower via ladder or stairway while fighting with Ninja swords or light sabers or whatever.
When I started to make a ladder for the Chumbe, I thought the Russian tower's ladder might be adaptable.
Sure enough, it fits with only a little adjustment.
These towers were built at different times by different people for different purposes, but their dimensions are remarkably similar. England and Russia have a history of real cooperation behind adversarial noises.
American Radio Library has added a few issues of a newsletter from McMurdo Silver, one of the most expensive radios of the '30s. I've never seen one. They were rare for a good reason.
In no sense of the word is the MASTERPIECE V standardized. Each one is different, each one custom built to the exact specifications and needs of its particular owner.
Basically, the MASTERPIECE V which we offer you is an extraordinarily flexible basic design having certain fundamental characteristics. Upon this flexibility is erected the structure of your own particular receiver.
With your order you give us information about your antenna location, your home, your reception conditions and your own particular desires and specifications of what you want.
With this data at hand, McMurdo Silver personally plans and lays out your own radio and supervises its building to these exact specifications. Through building and preliminary test and adjustment, this is your radio, not a standardized averaged radio, but your own special set.
Despite the 'bespoke' verbiage, all McMurdo radios looked the same.
You can see that they're all the same chassis, clumsily inserted in different cabinets. The cabinets are also clumsy and ill-proportioned.
A closeup shows an even worse problem:
The dial bezel is stylish but the knobs are generic and cheap. Ham operators and experimenters bought these knobs. No professional manufacturer used them. Better knobs were available from regular suppliers, and the professional radiomakers commissioned or made their own knobs to match their elegant cabinets. Even GenRad, which sold only to industrial customers, had its own style in dials and knobs.
Why would you pay bespoke prices for a clumsy standardized radio that looked like something a ham cobbled together from junkbox parts?
¶ 1:12 AM
Tuesday, February 18, 2020
I've been trying to figure out why we're hearing all these Repooflican-style soundbites from Bloomberg. When a topic gets into the media and isn't instantly silenced, we're supposed to take in the topic and digest it. If we weren't supposed to hear this stuff, we wouldn't hear it.
Figured it out after writing a brief comment on an article about Bloomberg:
Bloomberg vs Trump is the perfect "election" for Hillary. Clinton puppet vs Clinton puppet. The Clinton mob wins both ways. Bloomberg wouldn't be as much fun because he couldn't be used as an Official Hate Target. Hillary wouldn't be able to dissociate her brand from her actions.
Aha. I was missing the point.
Here's why we're getting these Bloomberg clips that sound like the standard parody of Repooflican rhetoric on race and class. Bloomberg is being sprayed with orange paint. He's being prepared as a slightly different and shorter version of Trump, so the Epstein-Clinton mob can continue to use him as Official Hate Target. The fun must continue either way.
Why do Bloomberg and Trump stand still for the spraying? It's not obvious to non-power-seeking people, but a memory from high school helps. The principal, Mr Bishop, was a smart power seeker. He was a short bald man at a time when baldness wasn't fashionable. [Shortness is never fashionable.] Everyone called him Old Chromedome when he wasn't watching. So: At pep rallies Mr Bishop officially became Old Chromedome. When he came out to start the rally, the band played the cartoonish Parump-tee-dump, parump-tee-dump thing. Laughing was required. Miss Marley, the classic frumpy old maid who looked like a cash register, appeared after Chromedome, accompanied by The Stripper theme.
Channeling hate into Officially Approved Events makes it easier for the Official Hate Target to keep power during the Unofficial Hours. Orwell missed this point when he made Immanuel Goldstein a separate character.
¶ 11:06 PM
Too soon old, too late smart
I've been shaving with Norelco from the start. Only three shavers... first one given by parents on 16th birthday, second inherited from Grandpa in 1974, third bought in 1992. Replaced the blades a few times along the way. Very little use of materials and electricity.
After 54 years of useless experience with one type of machine, I just now figured out the right way to do it. DON'T PUSH. A light touch works. The harder you push the less you shave.
Pushing seems logical, but in this case it's wrong.
Professor Anne Draffkorn Kilmer, who works as the curator at the Lowie Museum of Anthropology at Berkeley, spent fifteen years deciphering the clay tablets which were uncovered and excavated in Syria by French archaeologists in the early 1950s. The tablets, it has been confirmed, formed “a complete cult hymn and is the oldest preserved song with notation in the world.”
The article includes a MIDI rendition of the song with accompaniment, which probably would have been harps or lyres.
It doesn't sound anything like traditional Arab music or early European music. It sounds more Oriental, like this Korean song.
¶ 4:44 AM
More nonsense about random sequencesBBC tries to deal with the contrast between mathematical random and human random. Specifically they're talking about the tendency to bet against a streak.
This isn't a math error. It's natural, and in most situations it's a valid response to reality. It's only a counterproductive fallacy when the events are TRULY mathematically random, like the numbers in a lottery. (I was going to list some other examples like the pennies of a stock price, but lottery numbers are the ONLY true example. Stock prices are rigorously controlled down to the femtopenny by HST. Every microvariation is designed to benefit somebody, and it ain't you.)
When a streak or run happens in a natural or human-controlled sequence, it's NOT just part of randomness. It's meaningful. We should recognize it as a trend or phase, and in fact we usually do.
Here's a situation where betting against a streak is a VALID response:
One team of researchers recently analysed US judges’ decisions on whether or not to grant asylum to refugees. Logically speaking, the ordering of the cases should not matter. But in line with the gambler’s fallacy, the team found that the judges were up to 5.5% less likely to grant a case if they had granted the two previous cases – a serious decline from the average acceptance rate of 29%. Consciously or not, they seemed to think that the chances of having the same judgement three times in a row was just too small, and so they were more inclined to break the streak.
The researchers next analysed bank staff considering loan applications. Once again, the order of the applications made a difference: the loan officers were up to 8% more likely to reject an application after they had already accepted two or more in a row – and vice versa.
Both of these are HUMAN-CONTROLLED sequences where we KNOW that organizations are at work. When you receive a dozen asylum or loan applications that look similar, the applications are NOT random. They were created by an NGO, a "human rights" organization attempting to storm the gates. The technique is well known by front-line agents who handle such applications. Breaking the storm is a correct and PRODUCTIVE response.
Good observation, inadequate reason
Comment from one of the Tesla skeptics on Elon's permanent habit of "inventing" things that have been perfectly common and ordinary for centuries:
Pardon me but I can't say this enough: Musk could never have got away with his schtick 25 or 30 years ago; it's all enabled by the collapse of science education and knowledge of popular history. We've entertained ourselves into suckerdom.
Partly right, partly open to question. For sure Elon couldn't have done it a few decades earlier. Nobody would have bought his shtick or his shtock.
But I wouldn't blame the collapse of science education. Science ed was HORRIBLE in 1970. I think it's slightly better today. It's certainly not worse or 'collapsed' today.
Science ed outside the classroom is BRILLIANTLY better today for students who take advantage of it. Beautiful and informative demonstrations and animations of every conceivable topic are easily available on Youtube. [And some of the animations are available right here in this blog!]
In 1970 you couldn't see those demonstrations or animations. Everything was text or still pictures. Even historical science events that had ALREADY HAPPENED weren't available in 1970. Physics classes watched filmstrips of the Tacoma Narrows bridge. Real films existed, but we didn't see them. Now you can see the real films. The same applies to medical topics and optical demonstrations and acoustic ... and everything you can imagine.
You can see all** of Elon's fake "inventions" in their original century-old forms. Electric cars, early pneumatic subways, solar roofs, all of it.
It's all there at your fingertips, with Youtube's "suggested" serving as a helpful librarian.
If you want text and still pics, you can read centuries of real science publications in Google Books and American Radio Library and dozens of other places. A tiny fraction of those publications would have been available to a 1970 university student who was willing to trudge up and down 10 flights of narrow stairs in the Old Stacks of the library carrying hefty volumes. Most would have been completely inaccessible in other libraries and other countries.
So the problem isn't in available education and available knowledge. The problem is that nobody WANTS to take advantage of the knowledge. Elon's cultists are just as blindly loyal as any apocalyptic cult. They cut out all sources of competing knowledge.
= = = = =
** Well, not all. Some of his fake "inventions" are so catastrophically stupid that nobody would have bothered with them before. Nobody invented a long metal tube for traveling through caves because everyone who had been in a cave knew how caves are arranged.
"I could teach anybody, even the people in this room" to be a farmer, said Bloomberg during a 2016 talk at Oxford University in a now-viral clip in which he called agriculture a process. "You dig a hole, you put a seed in, you put dirt on top, add water, up comes the corn."
Bloomberg then described metalworkers similarly.
"You put the piece of metal in the lathe, you turn the crank in the direction of the arrow, and you can have a job."
Working in the information economy is “fundamentally different, because it’s built around replacing people with technology and the skill sets that you have to learn are how to think and analyze. And that is a whole degree level different. You have to have a different skill set, you have to have a lot more gray matter.”
Farming is the deepest and most educated skill in the world. It takes many generations to develop a good farm and a good farmer, and the two must develop together.
Bloomberg not only displayed his own typical NYC decorticate vacuous cranial cavity, he made a reverse comparison with the "information economy". Farming and metal work have been computerized longer than just about anything else.
The first time I saw a desktop computer was in 1974 at Parsons Grain Company. I was working for an elevator repair firm, and I had delivered some of our equipment to the elevator. As I was waiting to fill out forms, Mr Parsons proudly showed me his completely computerized loading and storage system, and his web-connected computer to keep track of grain prices and futures. At that time I'd never seen a computer in actual use; I'd only seen the mainframes in university facilities.
Metalwork has been computerized MUCH longer. From Wikipedia's history of CNC machine tools:
The birth of NC is generally credited to John T. Parsons and Frank L. Stulen, working out of Parsons Corp. of Traverse City, Michigan. In 1942, Parsons was told that helicopters were going to be the "next big thing" by the former head of Ford Trimotor production, Bill Stout. He called Sikorsky Aircraft to inquire about possible work, and soon got a contract to build the wooden stringers in the rotor blades. At the time, rotor blades (rotary wings) were built in the same fashion that fixed wings were, consisting of a long tubular steel spar with stringers (or more accurately ribs) set on them to provide the aerodynamic shape that was then covered with a stressed skin. The stringers for the rotors were built from a design provided by Sikorsky, which was sent to Parsons as a series of 17 points defining the outline. etc....
A lathe operator has been a computer operator for many decades.
NYC ignorance is meta-ignorance. The NYC demon doesn't know anything about reality AND doesn't know that humans can instantly recognize how fucking stupid the NYC demon is.
(Next day, a somewhat smarter thought on the subject.)
Multifocal fuckheadArticle by Godwin, the writer of Godwin's Law.
He's been around the net since the BBS/USENET days, and he's been a lawyer dealing with net cases most of that time.
He says he used to be pure libertarian, but now he's starting to believe that more controls are needed because the WRONG SORT OF PEOPLE are using freedom. RUSSIAN_MEDDLING can't be allowed to MALIGN_BEHAVIOR the web, and of course non-Sorosians need to be EXTERMINATE EXTERMINATE EXTERMINATE. Individual Liberty requires it. Individual Liberty means Soros owns everything.
Here's one focus of idiocy:
Another thing we clearly got wrong is how large platforms would rise to dominate their markets—even though they never received the kind of bespoke regulated-monopoly partnership with governments that, generations before, the telephone companies had received. In most of today’s democracies, Google dominates search and Facebook dominates social media. In less-democratic nations, counterpart platforms—like Baidu and Weibo in China or VK in Russia—dominate their respective markets, but their relationships with the relevant governments are cozier, so their market-dominant status isn’t surprising.
Nonsense. Google was a government contractor from the start. Long before the web, big tech companies were primarily government contractors. It started in 1946 and it was already obvious in 1960 when Ike talked about it.
Second focus of idiocy:
Alternatively, as in this 2019 piece by Matt Schruers, the newly appointed president of the Computer & Communications Industry Association, it’s sometimes called “the moderator’s dilemma,” where opposing incentives lead either to the suppression of viewpoint diversity or to websites “plagued with off-topic content, trolling, and abuse.”
One reason we need to keep Section 230 safe—a reason I didn’t have the foresight to champion back in the 1990s—is that it’s crucial to fighting disinformation: It allows internet platforms to curate their content without necessarily increasing liability.
Platforms have always curated content. It's called publishing. Publishers have always worked within the constraints of liability for real harm. Publishers didn't need Section 230. Moderating specialized forums has always been a hard job. Do you kick out the asshole who really knows his stuff but can't stop lording it over others? Or do you stay loose and keep the asshole's valuable knowledge while losing some newbies? Alphia Hart discussed it often in his 1950's anti-Hubbard magazine Aberree. Editors of radio hobbyist newsletters discussed it in the '30s. It's just part of the job. No easy solution.
Third focus of idiocy:
I remain skeptical as to whether tactics like microtargeting and demographic profiling, whether used by political campaigns or foreign governments, are as effective at manipulating people as some critics fear, but I see nothing wrong with using legal and policy tools to stop malicious actors from trying to use these tools.
Nothing new about profiling. It's called knowing your customers. Scammers have always done the best job of knowing their customers. The post office and Ma Bell always made efforts to stop scammers, though it was easier with mail. Also, in previous decades media tried to educate people about the techniques of scammers. Now that our entire "economy" is mobs and rackets, nobody wants to train the suckers.
But Godwin isn't talking about scammers when he says MALICIOUS ACTORS. The keyword means only one thing. Surprise surprise surprise.
I still believe that, but here in 2020 I’m also haunted by the challenges we face everywhere in the world in this century, ranging from climate change to income inequality to the (not-unrelated) resurgence of populist xenophobia and even genocidal movements.
Freedom is fine as long as the free people are 100% SorosThought. Any entity that is not 100% SorosThought is MALICIOUS_ACTOR MALIGN_BEHAVIOR and must be EXTERMINATE EXTERMINATE EXTERMINATE.
The only genocidal movements are on your side, fuckhead. Greta is explicitly and joyfully genocidal.
Is Godwin just an idiot, or is he an AP? I'm inclined toward idiot. The centralizing nature of the web was perfectly clear in the '80s. NSA was the central node, and NSA developed the web for its own ends, not for "liberty". The other problems have been around long before the web, and didn't inspire "libertarians" to favor total censorship.
Meta-Godwins-Law left as exercise for reader.
Just noticed that the previous two items are metaphorically identical. Honest beacons vs corrupt beacons,honest experts vs corrupt experts.
The first problem was solved when governments took control of all lighthouses and kicked out the wreckers.
Obviously we can't eliminate the expert wreckers the same way, because government is already paying and controlling the wrexperts.
Stepping back: Who forced governments to clean up the wreckers? The shipping industry, which was crucial to the success of governments. Tariffs and excise taxes depended on ships getting from origin to destination without wrecking. Corrupt aristocrats were less important than the tariffs.
Is there a way to create the same economic counterforce or GUILD among people who want and need uncorrupted facts? Can we reverse Zuesse's idea? I can't see it, but the question is worth some thinking.
Trinity House is funded by user fees charged to ships. If you reach port safely, you have to thank the beacons and buoys and foghorns for helping you get there. What would you pay for a certified fact beacon, which always brings your thinking and writing into port safely? A sharp acetylene light that busts through all the Shared Lies and illuminates simple truth? A beacon that never disagrees with experience and observations, never agrees with theories or Deepstate or bankers or politicians or "social" "science"?
Is there a tax or benefit to government that can be threatened by a guild withdrawing support? Probably not. Sorosian dysgovernments run solely on debt, in a closed satanic circle with the demonic bankers. Print money, print bonds, buy bonds with money. Revenue no longer motivates dysgovernments. No feedback allowed.
Even aside from funding, the idea is completely impractical. If the Guild's leaders wanted to survive, the organization would have to be off-planet, unreachable by US rockets and unjammable by NSA. So it would be incapable of communicating the truth.
Could the guild be implemented without leaders? Could it be an unconquerable digital virus, penetrating all networks, halting and discarding all signals from all sources connected at any level of remoteness to Deepstate? No. Unconquerable is impossible. NSA would flip it.
Beacons and counterbeacons
I was thinking and reading about the remarkable continuity of beacons. This Acetylene journal has a nice long history of lighthouses and buoys, focused naturally on acetylene.
Beacons have been important parts of shipping for thousands of years, and beacons have also been an important metaphor.
From the Iliad:
So, tonight, wandering sailors pale with fears,
Wide o'er the watery waste, a light appears.
Which, on the far-seen mountain blazing high,
Streams from some lonely watch-tower to the sky.
Lighthouses and buoys used unique sequences of colors or flashes to identify their location. Radio beacons for ships and aircraft adopted the practice with identifiable sequences of Morse. Those sequences turned into call letters, which were later extended to broadcast stations.
Through the same long history, hackers have faked beacons to force shipwrecks and steal the loot:
St. Agnes, Scilly, light, built in 1680. shows an improvement by enclosing the fire with glass, forming a lantern, and the use of a stove-pipe for carrying off the smoke and products of combustion. The first keeper of this light was a wrecker and it was noted that very often his light was very dim, rarely extinguished, however, to cover himself, but dim enough to allow vessels to run on shore and be wrecked. The plunder from wrecked ships was found, after a report and investigation, under a coal pile at the lighthouse.
For instance, those making minimum wage at a Burger King somewhere, while honorable work, may not have the luxuries of the billionaire lifestyle - but at least they never have to worry about slamming their super-yacht into the side of a prized coral reef off the coast of Belize.
Because that's the problem that hedge fund manager Daniel Loeb is being forced to deal with this week. Loeb's yacht damaged what is being called a "pristine reef" near the famous Great Blue Hole outside of Belize, according to Bloomberg.
Loeb's 200 foot yacht was filmed last Sunday anchored at Belize's Lighthouse Reef Atoll.
Obviously Loeb's crew wasn't paying attention to the actual modern lighthouse on Lighthouse Reef, nor to the modern beacons of GPS.
Or maybe a wrecker was jamming GPS? Unlikely. Modern wreckers are probably working for the bankers, just as the old wreckers were often corrupt aristocrats:
The grant by the crown for the establishment of these lights was considered to be of so much importance that one of the noted English lords, very near the court and an adviser of the king. Lord Grenville, notes in his diary : "Watch for the time when the king is in a good humor and ask him for a lighthouse." In this way many of the king's favorites absorbed many of the most important stations. This became in time such an intolerable nuisance that the shipping people petitioned the king for redress.
Henry VIII responded to the pressure by founding Trinity House, a mutual benefit association or guild for sailors, and giving it full authority over lighthouses and navigation. Trinity House still exists and still has the same functions. Remarkable continuity for an organization, breaking all of Parkinson's Laws. Serving the same purpose for 500 years, funded the same way for 500 years. Every ship that docks at British ports pays a user fee to Trinity House.
= = = = =
Irrelevant stupid footnote by a fussbudget proofreader type: The last line of Alexander Pope's translation above should be a lonely watch-tower, not some. The previous three lines have a long-legged meter that beautifully captures the light beam skipping over the waves.Some trips up the meter.
¶ 1:19 AM
Saturday, February 15, 2020
Zuesse gets it backwards
Zuesse often shoots a sharp arrow with great precision into a conventional target.
This time he's shooting backwards. He's saying that ANY censorship is the mark of a dictatorship, and ALL censorship must be banned. He confesses that the ban is hard to imagine and hard to do in practice, but his proposed alternative is no improvement at all.
On print or broadcast media, every news-piece will be controlled in real time by its audience so as to determine what the questions are and then to bring into the presentation randomly selected scientifically qualified experts regarding each such question. For example: on the question of climate-change, the experts would be individuals who have terminal graduate-level degrees in each of the related climatology sub-specialties, such as those listed at Wikipedia, but also in essential related fields such as economics (an important climatological sub-specialty that’s not listed there). If, indeed, over 90% of climatologists agree that man-made global warming is a reality, then the result of this method of selecting the “experts” who will be presented is that that viewpoint will be represented by over 90% of the experts — and this outcome would not be controlled by the given ‘news’-medium, nor affected by its advertisers. In other words: only the subject-matter and academic qualifications — no governmental positions or background — would qualify individuals as being “experts” on the given topic. If a terminal degree isn’t a qualification for expertise on a topic, then what is?
We already do what Zuesse proposes. We trust advanced degrees because advanced degrees are given for CONFORMING TO CURRENT ORTHODOXY.
In some academic areas the current orthodoxy is uncontroversial**, so it might be correct. But in all of the areas that CONNECT WITH POLITICS AND NEWS, the current orthodoxy is determined by Deepstate.
In other words, some experts are uncorrupted, but they aren't going to be used by government or media, so they're irrelevant to this discussion.
As to the original question, I don't buy the premise. It's entirely possible to have healthy feedback from people to government in a culture with strong censorship. Most of the rulers we call 'dictators' were able to stay in power because they served the needs and interests of the people. They provided prosperity and freedom from crime, and allowed plenty of room for varied skills and talents. As long as you didn't insult the king or dictator, you could express anything you wanted.
The real problem is not LIMITED information, it's DISTORTED information. And the system Zuesse proposes, which is in fact our current system, guarantees distortion.
= = = = =
** For clarity: In those uncontroversial academic subjects that aren't closely connected to politics or media, the experts tend to be a lot more humble and open to learning and thinking. Every subject has internal orthodoxies and fashions, but it's a lot easier to break the internal fashion when government grants and accrediting agencies aren't enforcing Deepstate's preferred lies. When billions of dollars and institutional prestige depend on Deepstate, everyone will stick firmly to Deepstate's preference.
Seattle University, with funding provided by Microsoft, has created a free, online course intended to train businesses on the “meaning of ethics in AI.” That’s a promising move because it’s not just the tools that create problems. The developers themselves often don’t know how to think about ethical issues. Michael Quinn, Dean of the College of Science and Engineering at Seattle University, notes,
Many people who work in tech aren’t required to complete a philosophy or ethics course in school’, said Quinn, which he believes contributes to blind spots in the development of technology. Those blind spots may have lead to breaches of public trust…”
Philosophy or Ethics course???????????
The point is simple, and has nothing to do with "ethics" or ethics. The point is that the PEOPLE IN CHARGE of big data are totally immune from legalities. They are above and beyond the law. Suing them or regulating them is PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE because they are paid-up members of Epstein's Blackmail Web. Lawyers and regulators and judges want to remain alive and functional.
Everyone loves a good panicI wrote on Jan 25 that the fake "flu" panic was designed to shut down Wuhan province, to fire insubordinate leaders and squash an incipient rebellion.
True. See this and this.
Now it appears that China is also trying to reshape its own economy and the world's economy. See this.
Best guess: Creating the conditions for an "unavoidable" default on all debts followed by total cashless economy and MMT. Foreign investors would be forced to understand.
Deepstates elsewhere LOVE LOVE LOVE a fake panic. All are jumping on board to create military camps for dissidents and open borders for migrants, per the "medical" orders from WHO, even though the number of cases is still microscopic, nowhere REMOTELY near the cases and deaths from ordinary non-newsworthy non-panicable flu.
Flu is always a serious disease. This Swine Flu is also a serious disease because it's flu. Media never cover deaths from generic flu, so we get fake comparisons between ONE media death from Swine Flu versus ZERO media deaths from generic. The real comparison is more like ONE from Swine Flu versus ONE THOUSAND from generic flu in the same place and time interval.
It's similar to School Shootings. The vast majority of shooting deaths are within the criminal world, gangsters killing gangsters. Media never mention these deaths. Occasionally a gang murder happens near a school, and it immediately becomes a newsworthy School Shooting.
¶ 6:56 AM
Is Boris learning?
Boris seems to be following Putin's lead in several ways. After he threw the Brexit switch, his next move was to activate INFRASTRUCTURE.
Even before the bizarre anti-Brexit stageplay, England was paralyzed on the infrastructure front. The previous soap opera was centered on a third runway at Heathrow. For several years this was the ONLY topic of discussion, the ONLY allowed debate, in British politics. It was a pointless debate, and it wouldn't have solved any problems if built.
Now Boris has started a major high-speed railway, and his speech at the event sounded Putinish.
Latest move: Get rid of old cabinet, bring in people who will HELP HIM GET SHIT DONE. This is just a week after Putin's cabinet rebuild, and again the rhetoric is similar.
I've been hoping and ranting for years that SOMEBODY on the Sorosian side of the world would start LEARNING from the effective leaders on the non-Soros side.
Still reserving judgment, but the important sign is GETTING SHIT DONE instead of playing endless BLOCKING games.
= = = = =
The best cure for individual depression is
The same cure on a different scale works for national depression. Stop fussing about purity of motive and ideology. Just KEEP MOVING AND KEEP MAKING.
Chatley Heath sends the message.
More life, more value, more beauty. More life, more value, more beauty.
¶ 12:41 AM
Friday, February 14, 2020
Just oddUK Independent has an interview with Bernie's actual bro. His older brother Larry has lived in England for a long time, and is described as a retired academic.
Oddly, the bro doesn't seem to understand modern politics. His categories belong to the Adlai Stevenson era. Deepstate and globalism are not within his perception.
Even more oddly, he calls his younger brother Bernard, not Bernie. Normally it's the other way around. Siblings use nicknames, public uses full name.
Something's wrong with this picture, but I don't know what it is. The Independent is pretty much the only major US/UK media that supports Bernie, so they're not trying to raise doubts.
Update next day: Not so odd after all. Turns out BERNARD is just another NYC faker like DONALD.
Acetylene world 8, the most patient of all
Acetylene was an efficient and reliable light source, and the Dalen sun valve was an effective and reliable automatic control for acetylene lights. Lighthouses and buoys used it until the 1930s when electric systems began to reach the same reliability.
One lighthouse stuck with acetylene, and stuck with Dalen, until 2012. Chumbe Island lighthouse, on the east coast of Africa, was built in 1904 as an oil burner, converted to acetylene with Dalen in 1926, and finally converted to solar-powered electric in 2012.
You can see the Dalen hanging on the roof of the light itself, above Polistra's head.
Speaking of differentials....
While USA and UK are "debating" whether the death penalty plus torture or just the plain death penalty is the best punishment for heretics who insist that gender is binary, Russia continues running in the opposite direction.
Russia's constitutional working group is trying to add an amendment stating firmly and legally that a family is a male father and a female mother. Putin approves.
This is getting a little repetitive, but the contrast is so STARK and the difference is ACCELERATING so fast that I have to keep noticing. We are killing our culture and our people faster and faster and faster while Russia and others are RESTORING natural law faster and faster and faster.
Diff in architecture?In previous item I cited symmetry.
The best patient mechanisms, in life and in built devices, use active symmetry in the form of differentials or balances.
Is there an equivalent in architecture? I can think of patient systems but no diffs.
Bungalows are patient mechanisms. Winter sun heats the interior, summer sun doesn't touch the walls.
Double-hung windows are patient ventilation.
Gravity heating systems were sort of patient, but didn't work very well.
Aha! Drain traps are differential AND Willsonian patient. Balance maintains the water, and the water does all the work. A prosaic gadget with an elegant function!
More classical misdirectionMore on the Trump architecture "order".
Sumantra Maitra often makes tremendous sense and usually gets it. In this case, as with Dalrymple's article on the same subject, he is precisely correct about the violent nastiness of modernism.
Leave aside the fakeness of Trump, who has no fucking idea what he's talking about.
Dalrymple and Maitra are right about the bad side of this choice and wrong about the good side. Both specifically want Greco-Roman architecture with columns and arches.
Classic architecture is just as useless and wrong as modernism. Both arise from theories, not the reality of human shelter.
Symmetry and structure are important, as I've been emphasizing in art and music and grammar. But symmetry and structure should be formed on patient buildings that take care of natural enemies and human needs without excessive technology. Patient buildings are local by necessity. Snowy places and sunny places and rainy places and quaky places and floody places have distinct requirements, which must be solved experimentally. Greece is a sunny and stable place, so its forms aren't suited for other places.
Time for a reprint.
= = = = = START REPRINT 1:In the deep of winter I observed that the Cape Cod with heated attic is UNQUESTIONABLY the best house for snow. Not really surprising, since it was designed by experiment in a snowy place.
The modern idea that roofs should remain uniformly cold to avoid ice dams has been definitively disproved. Roofs should be steep and warm.
I started 'making' a tribute to Cape Cods, and it's pretty much finished now. Got carried away as usual, expanded the project to a nice 1930s neighborhood. Not quite ready for release; I like to do a little testing and usage before release, and these pictures are part of the testing. (The store interior was used here.)
First the winter version, since snow was the whole purpose of the project:
A different view in summer:
Continuing in '30s mode, I decided to tackle a pure Streamline Moderne, a THEORY-BASED style that has NOT held up over the years. Very few Modernes survive unless they're forcibly maintained by Historical Preservation laws.
= = = = = END REPRINT 1.= = = = = START REPRINT 2:Article in local paper features a museum exhibit on Mid-century Modern in Spokane. They detail one house that supposedly represents subtle functionality.
“In a way, it’s sort of Zen-like, with no unnecessary movements, no unnecessary notes if it were music – only what’s necessary to accomplish the program, whatever that happens to be. There’s a very simple beauty in that.”
Well, let's look at the featured house, 723 W. Sumner. It's in one of the best neighborhoods, and the landscaping is unquestionably beautiful. Google gets a nice view of the featured house (left) with its older "non-Zen-like" neighbor.
Which is more functional? Old non-Zen-like. It has a sloped roof and wide overhangs on all sides. Snow and rain can flow naturally off the roof; sun reaches the windows more in winter but less in summer; the foundation is protected from water (and thus somewhat protected from termites.)
The Zen-like modern house has a flat roof and no overhangs at all. It is highly vulnerable to snowload and leaks, it has no shelter from the sun, and its walls and foundation have no protection from water. That's not functional, it's just dumb.
Most of the dull ticky-tacky '50s houses in Spokane are more practical (i.e. less Zen-like) than this highly architected raw rectangle, which is why they have held up with very little maintenance. (Sidenote: The Google Street front view of the raw Zen-like rectangle was blocked by a maintenance truck parked in the driveway!... which is why I had to slide over to this side view. Probably unfair to draw conclusions from a single-day sample, but nevertheless it was there.)
= = = = = END REPRINT 2.
Erdogan is incurably American. I thought he had learned something, but obviously not. Now he will be forced to learn.
In 2018 Turkey agreed to help Russia end the Syrian war. This was clearly in Turkey's own interest. Having a war next door is dangerous, and Turkey had been bearing the burden of Syrian refugees for many years. A sane country would jump at the chance to end a war, and Erdogan was briefly sane.
Sanity should have been easy. All he had to do was NOTHING. Just mind his own fucking business and stop making war.
But he can't do NOTHING, can't mind his own fucking business, can't be sane. He's American. Now he's pushing back into Syria, fighting DIRECTLY AGAINST Russian forces. Russia has officially called the action unacceptable.
¶ 12:31 AM
Exceptions are worth examining.
The "election" this year started normally. DNC blatantly and obviously rigged the Iowa primary. Reassuringly normal.
Sucker Filter. If you're dumb enough to believe that the rigging was incompetence, you're the kind of "voter" both parties want and cherish and cultivate.
But at least initially, New Hampshire seems to have been unrigged. Bernie was allowed to win.
It's always hard to gather a pattern from only two instances, but Iowa and NH are traditionally the most important buildup for our "election" racket.
1. New Hampshire somehow resisted DNC's normal blackmail operations, kept its own functional system for counting votes, and didn't alter the results.
2. This is the rigged and planned result, for reasons that aren't yet evident.
Given the way our "elections" work, (1) is just barely conceivable, (2) is vastly more likely.
A quick hypothesis without any supporting data: William Henry Harrison. Bernie is 78 and had a heart attack or a "heart attack" during the campaign. He won't last much longer, and he knows it. VP Pete will be able to take over almost immediately, and Bernie's fans will fade away without resentment or resistance.
Elon's nail parlorAn investigation connected to a lawsuit found that Elon's Fremont factory has major connections to organized crime. A significant part of its inventory is "stolen".
Reminds me of a sharp observation by a British commentator: When you see a business that is thriving and surviving, but doesn't seem to have any customers, you can be pretty sure the business is a front for money laundering or other mob activities.
He was talking about small stores and nail parlors in strip malls. The same observation applies to Tesla on a much larger scale. Share value equal to Ford or Toyota, but very few actual cars compared to Ford or Toyota. Not a complete fraud, because products or services do exist; but the visible products are a small part of the operation.
Irrelevant sidenote: After using Ford and Toyota to represent the top two, I decided to check with reality. While waiting for the bus on the boulevard I sort of informally and proportionally "counted" brands. Ford and Toyota are NOT the top two. Ford and Chevy are still the absolute dominators, just as they were in 1970. After Ford and Chevy, it's about half Jap and half Jeep. Among the Japs, Toyota is not first. Subaru and Honda are roughly tied for first, with Toyota a distant third. Why did I overrate Toyota? Maybe because most of the taxis are Toyotas, so I've seen them and felt them from the inside?
My presumption about Tesla cars is accurate. In 68 years of watching cars, I've seen exactly two Teslas. I know they weren't the same car because one was red and one was white.
Update next day: Now it's THREE Teslas. The other two were Model 3, this one was a black Model X. Maybe they're starting to reproduce around here.
A few days later: Found the reason for the sudden increase. Earlier, when I hadn't seen any Teslas at all, I checked the map of "filling stations" for Teslas. At that time the nearest station was in Coeur d'Alene. Now there's a station in Spokane, which opened 12/21/2019. So the killer cars will be reproducing, and the fires and deaths will also be reproducing.
Was Lenin our SOB?
Russia Insight features the opening of a private archive, the letters of Admiral Kolchak. He began as an oceanographer, then enlisted in the Navy to help fight the Japs in 1904. He quickly became an Admiral.
When Germany and Japan and USA worked together in 1918 to break up Russia, (while we were still NOMINALLY fighting against Germany) Kolchak stayed with the Tsarist side, stayed with real Russia.
We were mainly working in Siberia, and Kolchak was also fighting there. Our side, the Axis side, captured Kolchak and turned him over to the Bolsheviks.
This casts the War Of Intervention in a new light. From available sources our goals were unclear, and perhaps we weren't entirely sure what we were doing. It appeared that we were trying to favor the Mensheviks.
The clip is equally unclear, leaving doubt whether Kolchak's capture was opportunistic or strategic. If it was strategic, it would certainly fit the usual pattern. When we start a revolution, our favored rebel usually wins. Castro and Khomeini were ours, funded and assisted by CIA. Both broke loose and opposed us, earning our undying enmity. If Lenin was ours, he would add to this correlation.
Doesn't know how things work
The new urbanist types are happy with Trump's "order" that pretends to suggest non-modernist architecture for federal buildings.
Dalrymple gets carried away:
The order will give renewed courage to patrons of architecture, who for a long time have been cowed by the architects’ mastery of high-sounding verbiage and gobbledygook to promote their inhuman work, so much of which these days looks like a snapshot taken of a huge shack in mid-collapse during an earthquake. Patrons, like the courtiers of the Emperor with no clothes, have hitherto been afraid to confront architects for fear of appearing ignorant and unsophisticated, but will no longer have to accept the dictation of architects. Examples will show that things can be done differently, that patrons do not have to accept what Thom Mayne, the architect responsible for some of the worst of recent buildings, called “demanding art-for-art’s-sake architecture that only other architects can appreciate.”
Shack in mid-collapse is a BEAUTIFUL AND PRECISE description of modern design. Unfortunately Dalrymple doesn't understand the sole purpose of Trump.
The people who write "orders" to be signed by Trump do understand their purpose. Everything Trump "does" is explicitly and cleverly designed to cause no actions by bureaucrats. The bureaucrats knew from the start that they could simply continue doing what they were doing under Obama. The only consequence of a Trump "order" is to shift the blame for bad results to "altright white neoNazis" who can then be rounded up and EXTERMINATED.
Now that classical architecture is officially associated with the Trump brand, any patron who asks an architect for a non-modern building can be instantly shipped to the ovens.
THIS IS NOT AN UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCE. THERE ARE NO UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES.
The study involved 184 college students who read short narratives that they were told were plots to possible television episodes.
The students read 15 narratives: one-third in which the villain was treated positively by the victim; one-third in which the villain received a just punishment; and one-third in which the villain was punished over and beyond what would have been a suitable penalty for the crime.
So the participants may have paused slightly before responding to the forgiveness stories to reflect, because they saw them as more meaningful, Grizzard said.
But while they also paused for the over-punishment narratives, they did not find them more meaningful, only more enjoyable, he said. That suggests the pause may have been simply to savor the extra punishment the villain received. "It appears to be the darker side of just enjoying the vengeance," he said.
Why is that the darker side? Encouraging goodness is the opposite of dark.
In a non-functional Sorosian culture where BIG crimes like killing millions and ruining billions of lives are INFINITELY REWARDED while undetectable "microaggressions" are SMASHED, it's normal to want more punishment for real crimes. We have a precise sense of balance, and we understand that negative feedback (error correction) has to be larger to null out a large departure from center.
From the last 24 hours on Spokane News:
3100 East 43rd, reported 21 year old is arguing with his mother about laundry and so he has called 911.
WSP trying to catch up to a speeding vehicle going 103 mph northbound on the NSC from Parksmith.
Monroe Street Bridge Police and Medical activity for a mental situation with a person on the bridge. Situation is under control on the bridge.
7500 North Division, Reported male taking off his clothes and laying down in the drive thru.
Barker and Broadway, Reported a Chicken in the roadway playing the chicken game with vehicles causing a traffic issue.
Division and Glass, Vehicle Collision Reported. #Update from WSP: Crash involving wrong way driver with stolen vehicle who failed to yield to trooper and hit a building.
And finally, since I seem to be focusing on power lines today,
10200 East Montgomery, Vehicle Collision Reported. #Update Semi vs Power lines and lines down. Montgomery is closed.
The truck snagged a low-hanging line and towed a whole block of wires and poles.
Britain starts acting like RussiaBoris starts action on high-speed rail.
I'd been wondering if this would happen, but didn't hold out much hope. Now that the three-year Wagner opera is finished, now that the fat lady actually and surprisingly sang, Britain is starting to GET SHIT DONE. Boris is starting to act like Putin and sound like Putin, starting to build Russian-style stuff.
There was a time many decades ago when railroads were the epitome of British-style stuff. Britain invented railroads, Britain was the premier shit-done-getter. Now Russia and China are the shit-done-getters, so Britain has to re-learn from Russia and China.
¶ 6:24 AM
Technically rightDC demons and stock-world demons have decided that the Swine Flu is a "bioweapon".
They're technically right but not in the way they mean. They want us to think that the virus was specially created as a weapon.
In fact the Swine Flu is a weapon in the same way that ricin and anthrax and EMP and Novichok and dirty nukes are weapons. All are potentially harmful, like a million other harmful things, but the virus or bomb is not the weapon, not the projectile.
PANIC IS THE PROJECTILE. The virus or chemical or bomb is just a thing that governments mention and manipulate to stir up anger and fear against a specific target. The target is always dissidents and rebels.
An airborne flu virus is useless as an actual weapon because a virus can't read your thoughts and can't figure out who is a threat to Deepstate. Most viruses kill infants and elders and chronically ill people, who are generally not threats.
¶ 5:58 AM
Why are nouns a better trellis?In previous item I mentioned a question that has been itching me for a while.
Why are noun forms more helpful than verb forms as a trellis or matrix to hold our thoughts in place when buffeted by the tornadic winds of Deepstate confusion?
The answer appeared immediately and serendipitously.
I was looking through the latest additions to the American Radio Library. This 1944 British engineering journal includes an obituary for Nikola Tesla, who died in '43. The obit was written by a man who had worked with Tesla, and focused on engineering, not cult worship.
Nikola had One Big Idea, based on steam-era thinking.
Storing energy and transferring energy are opposite processes with opposite needs.
The best way to STORE the results of labor is an inert mass like carbide or coal or wheat or gold. The stored material can't be active or reactive on its own. It must wait for the addition of water or heat or form.
The best way to TRANSFER the results of labor is a wave.
Why? Because a simple DC flow carries mass. Transfer works best with a reciprocating element, whether it's a piston on a crankshaft or a light wave in the ether or a rotating magnet inside a static field. The mass remains centered on one location, and its motions create fields that transfer only the energy.
Ideally, transfer grows more efficient with increasing frequency because the reciprocating mass moves less, so you're diverting less energy into reactance and friction. Higher frequency means shorter wavelength, shorter reciprocation, more penetration of the energy field itself.
Nikola's One Big Idea was More Frequency. His career was More Frequency.
Unfortunately a complete power distribution system has practical limitations that counteract this ideal formula. First: Whether AC or DC, it's better to use high voltage and low current for the long wires. Voltage is field, current is mass. High voltage is impractical for household use, so the HV mainline must be turned into low voltage power for houses. Second, as frequency increases, the energy pulls out toward the surface of the wire, so there's less cross-sectional area available to carry the electrons. The second limitation means that DC is actually somewhat more efficient for a high-voltage power line, but the first limitation requires some kind of "lever" to transform high voltage and low current into low voltage and high current. Until recently the best "lever" was a magnetic transformer, requiring AC. After solid state inverters matured, the main lines could be DC again to avoid the surface effect. Edison understood the whole system, and he ultimately won.
= = = = =
Now let's think about storing and transferring the most important products of labor, thoughts and culture. The situation is partly different because storage and maintenance are separate.
How do we maintain thoughts in our own brains? Not as inert carbide or coal or wheat. Thoughts are maintained as an infinitely complex resonance within the neurons and glia of the brain and body and muscles.
Culture is maintained as reciprocal and resonant interactions between people.
We can dry out a thought and turn it into a sentence or a painting or a song, which can then be stored like wheat or carbide, waiting for a buyer to activate it with fire or water or perception.
But most of the time a thought is a formant or harmonic within the infinite resonance of a brain, and most of the time a culture is live resonances between people.
Here's where noun vs verb comes back into the picture. The matrix of noun forms describes relatively static positional relationships. Number, gender, containment, location. Cases explicitly pin down interactions between people, so cases retain culture. Thus nouns are a better and more stable trellis or harp to maintain a growing and changing resonance.
Deepstate's chaotizers are smashing all the categories of grammar, from gender to relationships to tenses. A stricter and more algorithmic grammar helps to withstand ALL of these assaults, but the nouns are somewhat more important because of the resonant nature of thought.
Not a good fit
I made a stupid pun in previous item about woke math.
My pronums are x, f(x) and df(x)/dt.
X is exactly a pronum, but those math functions don't correspond to noun cases. They sort of halfway correspond to verb tenses or aspects.
What part of math would correspond to noun cases? I suppose set theory, but only in a limited way. Cases are dynamic and set theory is static. A set statement like 'x is in A' would fit genitive, and that's about all. There's no math way of expressing dative or accusative or instrumental.
= = = = =
Later extending the thought: We're accustomed to the tiresomely repeated Expert assertion that math is the universal tool, the universal language. Simply not true. Language is the best tool for thinking because it's a NATURAL PART of our minds.
But I mean more than just "writing helps you think". That's obvious. I mean that grammar can be used as a framework for thinking in the same way that addition and subtraction and integrals. The tool works best in languages where noun cases and verb forms are visible and chartable and algorithmic. The Latin descendants like Spanish have algorithmic verbs but no noun math. Teutonic languages have lost their algorithms entirely. (English has a Latin vocabulary, but it's Teutonic in grammar.) Russian has strongly algorithmic nouns and weakly algorithmic verbs. Hindi, though directly descended from totally algorithmic Sanskrit, has lost noun forms in the same way as the Latin descendants.
The agglutinative languages like Hungarian and Korean are STRICTLY algorithmic in all ways. They should offer the best tool for this purpose, the best framework for clear thinking.
As I've noted before, noun structure seems to be more important than verb structure, for reasons that I haven't figured out. A strong noun matrix helps to hold your thoughts in place when barraged by Sorosian confusion. A verb matrix ought to help, but the experimental evidence favors nouns for this purpose.
Continued in next item.
"The incorrect math on the Caucus Math Worksheets must not be changed to ensure the integrity of the process. Most importantly the Worksheet is the caucus chair and secretary's "certification" of the results as required by Iowa Code 43.4(2-3). It is the legal voting record of the caucus, like a ballot."
"The IDP's role is to facilitate the caucus and tabulate the results. Any judgement of math miscalculations would insert personal opinion into the process by individuals not at the caucus and could change the agreed upon results. That action would be interfering with the caucus' expression of their preferences."
Correct arithmetic is a "personal opinion". Room 101. Github.
My pronums are x, f(x) and df(x)/dt.
More sauer Krauts
First the governor of Thuringia was forced to quit because he allowed the wrong sort of people to vote for him. Now the genderless biped entity which was described as Merkel's heir has quit for the same reason. This entity, with the ultimate Kraut name of Schnacklgrackl von und zu Krampfenscheissen-Scheissenkrampfen, was head of the CDU party. Up to now it seemed to be the ideal globalist, but apparently it wasn't watching carefully enough and allowed real humans to be counted as voters.
#Desistance can be costly
Speaking of IOT and #desistance....
A year ago Avista announced that it would start installing smart meters. They allowed users to opt out for a fee. The opt-out procedure was fairly complicated, and the fee was $5 per month. I filled out the forms immediately.
Opting out doesn't exempt you from receiving a digital meter, it only means that (allegedly) the wi-fi on the digital meter won't be turned on. So far the new meter hasn't been installed, so I'm not paying the fee yet.
This year the fee was raised to $15 a month, placing a stronger barrier against heretics. Bait and switch. $15 is half of the baseline bill, half of what I pay in summer months. Still OK. I'm a strong and determined #desister. Even though the opting out is probably fake, I want to send an economic signal that some people disapprove of invasions.
Of course there's nothing new about smart meters, and there's nothing new about power companies using their wires to send information. Power has always been modulated by 'intercom' signals to coordinate and synchronize substations. What's new about the latest smart meters is the use of wi-fi instead of modulation, and the instant gathering of info about what's happening inside your house. The old smart meter only knew when your usage increased or decreased. The new smart meter can communicate with all of your IOT crap.
Especially big AI point-missingAnother day, another point missed.
This one is especially egregious. The author lists several genuine threats, several ways that the Internet Of Things could be weaponized by an "invader". He then tells us that the Experts in Centres must get together and make laws against such weaponizing. We know what the Experts in Centres want, and it's the opposite of the solution.
The listed threats are realistic and accurate, but the author consistently assumes that the threats are coming from MALIGN BEHAVIOR foreign countries. In fact the invader is not foreign. The real invader is our own Deepstate, and the invasion is done. Everyone who uses IOT is already conquered.
There is no overall solution, only individual SELF-DEFENSE. Desistance, not resistance. People who don't want to be fully conquered must steadfastly exclude the invading devices from their houses and bodies.
Centre for = Satan
Any time you see an organization named "Centre for ___" you can be sure it serves Soros.
Nice little example. ZH published an article on dissatisfaction with democracy, written by the newly founded Centre for the Future of Democracy.
The brief article, the leadin or hook for public consumption, sounds benign. Seems to be advocating different systems of voting. It never mentions the real purpose of the Centre.
Newly founded is a good clue to the real purpose, and the real purpose appears instantly when you read the full report.
Across the globe, democracy is in a state of deep malaise. In the West, growing political polarisation, economic frustration, and the rise of populist parties, have eroded the promise of democratic institutions to offer governance that is not only popularly supported, but also stable and effective.
Got it. Populist parties are destroying democracy.
No surprise. When Experts in Centres use the word democracy they mean Absolute unquestioned rule by Experts in Centres.
Populist parties intend to break up the Centres, so populist parties are the destroyers of democracy.
This particular Centre, of course, was newly founded when the people voted three times for Brexit. As long as the government continued to ignore the voters, Britain was safe for democracy. When Boris decided to obey the voters, democracy died.
Nice but too late
Listening to Tulsi's live event. Mostly the same story she tells every time.
She just said "How do you GET SHIT DONE?"
Bravo. Too late. She should have started talking HARDASS a lot earlier.
It still wouldn't have made any difference because Hillary is automatic and permanent empress. But HARDASS talk would have reached a few more people, perhaps stirred a few more heretical thoughts. Tulsi's relentless dry calm rational discourse simply doesn't penetrate.
¶ 4:10 PM
Dalen descendantVia Eurekalert, an elegant passive desalination system that uses the intrinsic qualities of water and materials to achieve huge efficiency.
The device is essentially a multilayer solar still, with a set of evaporating and condensing components like those used to distill liquor. It uses flat panels to absorb heat and then transfer that heat to a layer of water so that it begins to evaporate. The vapor then condenses on the next panel. That water gets collected, while the heat from the vapor condensation gets passed to the next layer.
Whenever vapor condenses on a surface, it releases heat; in typical condenser systems, that heat is simply lost to the environment. But in this multilayer evaporator the released heat flows to the next evaporating layer, recycling the solar heat and boosting the overall efficiency.
No electricity or gas, no software, no fancy nanomaterials. Dalen and Willson would approve!
Polistra was named after the original townsite of Manhattan (the one in Kansas). When I was growing up in Manhattan, I spent a lot of time exploring by foot, bike, and car. I discovered the ruins of an old mill along Wildcat Creek, and decided (inaccurately) that it was the remains of the original site of Polistra. Accurate or not, I've always liked the name, with its echoes of Poland (an under-appreciated friend of freedom) and stars. ==== The title icon is explained here. ==== Switchover: This 2007 entry marks a sharp change in worldview from neocon to pure populist. ===== The long illustrated story of Polistra's Dream is a time-travel fable, attempting to answer the dangerous revision of New Deal history propagated by Amity Shlaes. The Dream has 8 episodes, linked in a chain from the first. This entry explains the Shlaes connection.