It’s useful to think about why there is deaf culture but not blind culture. Wikipedia’s article on the former is vastly longer than its short squib on the latter, which sums up, “…blind people integrate with the broader community and culture, and often do not identify blindness as a defining part of their culture.” That’s because language can be essential to identity. Just as nationalism in Europe was an offshoot of the consolidation of local spoken dialects into a standardized national written language (such as the French government’s imposition of the Parisian dialect on its sprawling domain), deaf culture exists due to the consolidation of sign languages. Language is fundamental to communication, of course, and perhaps even to thought. So life tended to be extremely difficult for those born deaf, especially if they didn’t work out an idiosyncratic sign language with their families.Before computers, deaf people had a much wider range of occupations than blind people. Industrial work and farm work need good eyes, but don't need ears. Noisy industrial environments are actually EASIER for deaf people than hearing people. Deaf folks were common in printing. When I worked at Cromwells, we contracted our linotype work to Gene Laird, a deaf guy who ran his own linotype shop in a storefront. His wife handled the telephone and talked with visitors. Gene ran the machine and drove around to distribute the finished forms to Cromwells and Vaters and Daugherty. No problem after you got used to talking by writing. Automation and offshoring were thus especially hard on deaf workers. Computers made life easier for blind people, but actually got in the way of AMERICAN deaf people because AMERICAN deaf people are not good at writing and reading English. This is NOT true in other countries. You can see the difference easily when looking at deaf Youtubers. Most Americans type incoherent descriptions and titles. Others, including Brits, write correctly. This is not a problem with ears, it's a direct result of the deaf subculture eliminating real English from their schools. And this is a standard procedure. "Human rights" crusaders ALWAYS damage their "protected" groups. The "protected" groups must lose their native skills and niches so they need the "protection" of the NGOs and government.
Labels: skill-estate, Sorosia
Labels: Sorosia
Labels: Sorosia
But if you think I’m too toxic or controversial for you, if I’m making you uncomfortable, then wait till you face the onslaught of tech-savvy young Chinese people who are going to flood every comment section and social media page when the Great Firewall comes down. They will be exposing you to completely unfamiliar ideas and ways of thinking, hysterically insulting your mother, arguing with everyone about everything, spamming “NMSL”, and hijacking threads and conversations, mostly through incoherent sentences written in broken and unintelligible English. Not all of them have an education level of above middle school. Some of them are barely literate or mentally sound, but all of them have an axe to grind with the west, and they will outnumber you 10 to 1.Broader point is that China walls off its net for classic self-defense. The net wall BLOCKS SOROS.
America’s control over the internet, and the narrative, is absolute. Any country that relies on American social media is taking a mighty big risk of having their government toppled due to populist sentiments, which is easily manipulated through social media - Twitter for example played a major role in the Arab Spring.
Labels: From rights to duties, Parkinson, Sorosia
Labels: Sorosia
Labels: Sorosia
The number of asylum seekers to the Netherlands dropped by nearly a half last year to about 30,000, in part due to an EU refugee deal with Turkey and the closure of the Balkan route used by migrants to reach Europe. The latest influx of migrants - mainly from the Middle East and Africa - accounts for only a small fraction of the non-Western population in the country. This suggests that the backlash against immigration is not only about new arrivals.This is a constant misunderstanding, even by good objective analysts. Common in discussions of regular crime, now appearing again in migrant crime. Analysts assume that people who are currently besieged by a problem must be the most strongly opposed to the problem. Life doesn't work that way. Who wants the harshest punishments for criminals? Who wants the biggest walls against migrants? Not people who have never been exposed to crime. If you've always lived in good neighborhoods or had private security services, you don't know what criminals are. Not people who live in permanently crime-ridden neighborhoods. They've given up. Harshites are people who ESCAPED from bad neighborhoods, and now see their blessed escape zone turning bad. People who used to be involved in crime and got out. Life is all about anticipation. Life is about the future. Everything we do and think and feel involves a HUGE helping of anticipation. We understand speech and writing, and we appreciate music, because we're forming templates several phrases ahead of the speaker. We walk and drive by anticipation of future steps and streets. We reproduce and work and plan and save because we are looking at the future for ourselves or our descendants. If you've never experienced X you can't anticipate X, so you can't spot the initial signs of X creeping into your life. If you've always been flooded with X, anticipation is pointless. You can't see a life without X. Comrade O'Brien and his followers, and the Innovative Disrupters of the tech-tyrant world, are killers. Anticipation depends on a PERMANENT or at least slowly-changing baseline. When the cultural baseline is constant, we have infinitely detailed templates for every aspect of life, enabling us to get along on sparse perception and minimal conscious thought. We have space and energy for more interesting thoughts or pursuits. When Soros and Bezos yank the ground from under us 100 times in every step, we have to devote ALL our energy and perception to basic survival. Permanent morality and slow-changing technology are like a savings account. Sorosian picosecond change is like hopeless debt. Needless to say, Soros hasn't missed this analogy; eliminating savings and burning cash are major parts of his omnicide project. = = = = = END REPRINT.
Labels: Jackboot stomping forever, Sorosia, storage
Labels: Answered better than asked, Morsenet of Things, Sorosia
The European Union will not impose sanctions on Belarus President Aleksandr Lukashenko, TASS reports citing Die Welt. The sanctions were opposed by Germany, France and Italy, as in their view the inclusion of Aleksandr Lukashenko in the black list would mean full suspension of dialogue with Minsk. The introduction of restrictive measures against the Belarusian leader was pushed for, first of all, by the Baltic states and Poland.Poland and the Baltics are solidly Sorosian now, at least in terms of power alignment. Germany and France and Italy, the core of EU, are losing their loyalty to US/Soros Deepstate.
Labels: Sorosia
Labels: infinite STUPID, Sorosia
No more. Putin has joined the Axis of Holocausters, along with everyone else except Sweden and Belarus. Sweden is an absolutely unique and total switch, while Belarus is the sole carryover of the proper Soviet tradition.
Later half-baked thought: Sweden and Belarus have three things in common, but the variables are so tangled up that these are probably meaningless. Both are "socialist" as seen by US "conservatives", and both engage in some degree of central planning, and both have retained their own industry. Still, I can't see any sort of pattern. Other centrally planned countries and own-industry countries locked down. The US states that avoided lockdown are definitely at the looser end of the planning axis, but all have plenty of real physical production. (Farms, oil, manufacturing.)
Earlier I posited taxation as important, and it still seems important. When a government depends on taxes from real production, it will be more reluctant to shut down real production.
This is THE question that deserves serious attention if we get a brief break between this panic and the next scheduled panic. Is there any ideology or decision-making method or culture or ethnicity that determined the choice? Or is it purely the personality of the ruler? At the moment personality seems to be the only 'uncrossed' variable, but others may show up on later examination.Labels: Constants and Variables, Natural law = Soviet law, Sorosia
And here's the Final Solution. Everything except Sweden and Belarus turned to Satan. Sweden is the biggest change, from the leading edge of Satan to the leading edge of God. Belarus also counts as a change; I had previously shown it as uncolored because it was steadily on God's side, but in this context holding steady is a relative change for the better.
And as always Korea and Japan are off the map, off the planet. Koreans and Japs are a different species. They remained sane in their own alien way, but they were never susceptible to the Soros virus.Labels: Natural law = Soviet law, Sorosia
What we are experiencing is a further evolution of the post-ideological model of power that came into being when global capitalism became a global-hegemonic system after the collapse of the Soviet Union. In such a global-hegemonic system, ideology is rendered obsolete. The system has no external enemies, and thus no ideological adversaries. The enemies of a global-hegemonic system by definition can only be internal. Every war becomes an insurgency, a rebellion breaking out within the system, as there is no longer any outside. As there is no longer any outside (and thus no external ideological adversary), the global-hegemonic system dispenses with ideology entirely. Its ideology becomes “normality.” Any challenge to “normality” is henceforth regarded as an “abnormality,” a “deviation from the norm,” and automatically delegitimized.NO LONGER ANY OUTSIDE. Hopkins has just made a BIG step in terms of science. 'Hard' science is based on laws of FLOW and FORCE and FRICTION. Ohm, Newton, Carnot. All of these laws tell us what happens when a GRADIENT of force is applied across a BOUNDARY, with real FRICTION. These laws tell us how much FLOW happens across the BOUNDARY. There are more complex and detailed laws for living things, telling us what happens when, for instance, a gradient of positive ions is applied to the cell wall of a neuron or muscle cell. Living things respond in a vastly more complex way than V=IR, but the overall form of the law is still the same. A gradient of force yields a flow. "Social" "science" has never** given us an FFF law. Hopkins hasn't formalized or quantified the law, but gives us the outline for a formal law. NO LONGER ANY OUTSIDE is what scares me most. When Putin and AMLO surrendered to the lockdown virus, I lost all hope. There is no longer a COUNTERFORCE, no longer a GRADIENT, no longer a BOUNDARY between Soros and non-Soros. Sweden is the only available counterforce, and it's not large enough or influential enough to hold the line. As I've tiresomely repeated, psychopaths like Soros and Bezos intend and plan to be the universe. In their minds, the entire universe is already ME and has been ME from the start of time. Non-ME elements do not exist. When non-ME elements appear to exist, the job of all authorities is to restore the ONLY CONCEIVABLE STATE OF THE UNIVERSE by exterminating the non-ME elements. Boundaries and gradients are not part of the Soros/Bezos universe. Flow is impossible, so reality and life are impossible. = = = = = ** Partial exception: In the 1850s when "social" "science" branched away from neurology, Freud and others began with a simple and sensible FFF law about pressure and flow of emotions. Freud abandoned the simple law and switched to nonsense about myths. Nobody else returned to his original line of thinking.
The concept of cryptocurrency has settled in general public for some time. This financial instrument has both enthusiastic supporters and implacable opponents. What does this term mean? Simply put, a cryptocurrency is a digital or virtual means of payment that exists only in a computer system and therefore has no physical equivalents in the form of banknotes or coins. More technically, it is a type of decentralized register consisting of independent devices, based on blockchain technology, using cryptographic solutions and storing assets information in contractual units. All transactions carried out in the world of cryptocurrencies are anonymous, but each of them is publicly available.Nope. Simply put and wrongly put. Clearly none of these academics have ever done bookkeeping, and clearly they don't understand what REAL currency is. "Existing only in a computer" is not a relevant variable. Real currency can certainly exist only in a computer. Before computers, real currency existed only in real ledgers, which evolved from clay tablets to wood sticks to paper books. Transactions were made and marked by various devices, from beads to gold coins to paper bills to checks. When real currency was transferred from paper books to computers, only the physical form of the record changed (again). The overall structure of modular and private ledgers for each account and business remained intact. Bitcoin is EXACTLY NOT "decentralized". It's EXACTLY centralized. Blockchain intentionally destroys the modularity and privacy of real ledgers by forcing all ledgers to be global variables. A global variable can be changed by the global controller, forcing all businesses and individuals to adopt the same number. This can't happen in a modular system. HOWEVER! The same article catches one point that I hadn't noticed before.
The first of them - Bitcoin - was proposed in 2008 by a person or group of people nicknamed Satoshi Nakamoto. This event coincided with the epicenter of the global financial crisis.As an old bookkeeper and programmer, I was able to spot the fraud instantly, and as an old Deepstate-watcher, the NSA and CIA connections leaped out with Sucker-Filter transparency. But I didn't notice the temporal synchronization. (I had the impression that bitcoin started in 2012.) So bitcoin was an integral part of the 2008 globalist coup. Crash real business, replace real business with the Dow, replace real modular ledgers with global ledgers for total control.
Labels: AI point-missing, Sorosia, Sucker Filter
Labels: Jackboot stomping forever, modest and stupid proposal, Sorosia
Labels: #DeplorableLivesMatter, Sorosia, Sucker Filter
Labels: Sorosia
I've switched Malaysia to Soros on my map. I've also switched Bolivia. To keep my spirits up, I've changed Argentina and Uruguay to God's side. Might be over-optimistic, but Kirchner is unquestionably a true Populist, and offered asylum to Evo.
Semi-related: AMLO, the best and most original of the new anti-Sorosians, is finally getting some respect and understanding from US leftists.
Labels: Sorosia
Another thing we clearly got wrong is how large platforms would rise to dominate their markets—even though they never received the kind of bespoke regulated-monopoly partnership with governments that, generations before, the telephone companies had received. In most of today’s democracies, Google dominates search and Facebook dominates social media. In less-democratic nations, counterpart platforms—like Baidu and Weibo in China or VK in Russia—dominate their respective markets, but their relationships with the relevant governments are cozier, so their market-dominant status isn’t surprising.Nonsense. Google was a government contractor from the start. Long before the web, big tech companies were primarily government contractors. It started in 1946 and it was already obvious in 1960 when Ike talked about it. Second focus of idiocy:
Alternatively, as in this 2019 piece by Matt Schruers, the newly appointed president of the Computer & Communications Industry Association, it’s sometimes called “the moderator’s dilemma,” where opposing incentives lead either to the suppression of viewpoint diversity or to websites “plagued with off-topic content, trolling, and abuse.” One reason we need to keep Section 230 safe—a reason I didn’t have the foresight to champion back in the 1990s—is that it’s crucial to fighting disinformation: It allows internet platforms to curate their content without necessarily increasing liability.Platforms have always curated content. It's called publishing. Publishers have always worked within the constraints of liability for real harm. Publishers didn't need Section 230. Moderating specialized forums has always been a hard job. Do you kick out the asshole who really knows his stuff but can't stop lording it over others? Or do you stay loose and keep the asshole's valuable knowledge while losing some newbies? Alphia Hart discussed it often in his 1950's anti-Hubbard magazine Aberree. Editors of radio hobbyist newsletters discussed it in the '30s. It's just part of the job. No easy solution. Third focus of idiocy:
I remain skeptical as to whether tactics like microtargeting and demographic profiling, whether used by political campaigns or foreign governments, are as effective at manipulating people as some critics fear, but I see nothing wrong with using legal and policy tools to stop malicious actors from trying to use these tools.Nothing new about profiling. It's called knowing your customers. Scammers have always done the best job of knowing their customers. The post office and Ma Bell always made efforts to stop scammers, though it was easier with mail. Also, in previous decades media tried to educate people about the techniques of scammers. Now that our entire "economy" is mobs and rackets, nobody wants to train the suckers. But Godwin isn't talking about scammers when he says MALICIOUS ACTORS. The keyword means only one thing. Surprise surprise surprise.
I still believe that, but here in 2020 I’m also haunted by the challenges we face everywhere in the world in this century, ranging from climate change to income inequality to the (not-unrelated) resurgence of populist xenophobia and even genocidal movements.Freedom is fine as long as the free people are 100% SorosThought. Any entity that is not 100% SorosThought is MALICIOUS_ACTOR MALIGN_BEHAVIOR and must be EXTERMINATE EXTERMINATE EXTERMINATE.
The only genocidal movements are on your side, fuckhead. Greta is explicitly and joyfully genocidal.
Is Godwin just an idiot, or is he an AP? I'm inclined toward idiot. The centralizing nature of the web was perfectly clear in the '80s. NSA was the central node, and NSA developed the web for its own ends, not for "liberty". The other problems have been around long before the web, and didn't inspire "libertarians" to favor total censorship.
Meta-Godwins-Law left as exercise for reader.Labels: #DeplorableLivesMatter, Aberree, Carbon Cult, malign misattribution, Sorosia
The current icon shows Polistra using a Personal Equation Machine.