There must be a reason...
Halfway reading an
article on wood-burning at Spiked. Boris is going all in with Greta, which is not a good idea at any level. In the broad moral sense, Gaia and her prophetess Greta are satanic genocidists. In the practical political sense, Boris just won an election with the votes of the people Greta wants to slaughter. He promised to take England AWAY from Soros and Greta, not TOWARD Soros and Greta. If he kills Deplorables even faster than before, he will lose his voters.
I was thinking my usual repetitive thoughts about wood vs
other heat sources. Gaians constantly play games with types of energy. Wood and coal are the dirtiest ways to get heat, but Gaians sometimes favor wood because it "sequesters carbon" by a peculiar nonsensical form of Gaian arithmetic. Despite being dirty, wood smoke smells good....
STOP. Why does wood smoke smell good?
Our intrinsic pleasure and pain detectors always serve a purpose. What's the NATURAL purpose of linking wood smoke with pleasure?
Several things commonly burn in Nature. Wood, leaves, dry grass, dry shit. In a few places coal and oil were naturally exposed and occasionally burned, but those places and times aren't common enough to need an innate response.
Among the common combustibles, burning wood is the most pleasant and burning shit is the most unpleasant. Burning animals are also unpleasant, mainly because of the hair.
I'd presume that a forest fire should signal danger, burning shit should be the cleanest way to dispose of it, and burning animals should advertise fast food.
Why is the spectrum inverted?
Forest fires are unquestionably a USEFUL AND PERMANENT part of natural patterns. Some trees can't reproduce without fire. Were we meant to do something with the results of forest fires?
Pre-technical people know what to do. They move in and start farming. Is that the
designed purpose of our sensory tropism? Attracting us to new farmland?
Labels: Carbon Cult, defensible thymes, Grand Blueprint