Wednesday, February 19, 2020
Wrong question
There's a new and pointless "debate" about eugenics, apparently started by Universal Idiot Dawkins.
Pointless because the "debate" is happening in Sorosian countries where the governments have already decided the question. At the leading edge of Sorosia, in places like California and Belgium and UK, eugenics is solidly allowed and moving fast toward required.
The non-Soros countries, led by Russia, are moving fast in the other direction.
Eugenics is just one of many symptoms of Sorositis. Arguing against it is like trying to affect the natural weather cycle by restricting CO2. Wrong end of the process.
The question under "debate" is:
How many oddballs should we kill?
= = = = =
As always, "Robust Debates" are auctions where both "sides" bid up the kill count.
The religious "side" says we should only kill some oddballs as a first step. The Dawkins "side" says we should kill more than all oddballs immediately.
Here's the real question:
Do we want civilization or not?
= = = = =
Civilization, as defined by God, makes places for all sorts of productive talents and tastes and tendencies, but punishes or eliminates people who persistently attack and kill others.
Eugenics is NOT about eliminating killers. The backers of eugenics are EXPLICITLY against punishing professional criminals.
How do we make civilization? How do we make places where many types of non-destructive people can be useful? First we need to have lots of PLACES. Separate places. Modularity. Sovereign countries, semi-sovereign provinces and cities, separated neighborhoods, businesses that can operate solely in separated neighborhoods without predation from globalized monsters.
The non-Soros side of the world is moving toward sovereignty at all levels, and trying to block globalized monsters. 
Labels: Jail mode, Natural law = Sharia law, Natural law = Soviet law, skill-estate
¶ 11:23 PM
