Reprint on "whistleblowers" and Shannon
In 2019 I had a pretty decent idea. Use the Thiel test on alleged "whistleblowers". Most would fail miserably, including Snowden, Manning, and this week's Facebook "whistleblower".

= = = = = START REPRINT:

Strikes me that a slight variation on the Thiel question is a good test for people who claim to be "ex"Deepstate, or "whistleblowers" against Deepstate.

The original Thiel question:

Tell me something that's true that nobody agrees with you on.

My looser version:

Tell me something that's true that nobody else knows.

= = = = =

Variation to test the EXness of "ex"Deepstaters:

Tell me something that's true that I don't already know.

Real intel agencies use this exact question intensely and rigorously to test claimed defectors from enemy intel. We should use it for the same purpose, since CIA and FBI and NSA are enemy intel.

"Ex"es always tell us things that we already know, or give us unnecessary details about things that we had already guessed. This is NOT Shannon information.

Shannon information is fully surprising and unexpected, totally unguessable and undeducible from existing knowledge. Shannon is consequential, not trivial. When you act on Shannon information, things change.

We could formalize this by gathering (online or in person) a jury of UNPAID NONEXPERTS who have some experience dealing with aspects of Deepstate. People who have been involved in "radical" activities where CIA or FBI planted APs, or people who have worked in tech areas where NSA's tentacles are visible. Require the "Ex" to tell us something that is fresh and surprising to all jurors.


= = = = = END REPRINT.

Labels: Asked and worth asking again, Leth

  ¶ 2:21 PM

  Proofreaderoleth
A fairly old cartoon that popped up in some memes:



Funny. It also hits several resonant notes with me. Jail experience, teaching, grammar, and ABOVE ALL .... proofreading.

I was slow to get the joke because I was stuck on the incorrect 2nd plural form.

Labels: Entertainment, Jail mode, Language update, Leth

  ¶ 3:40 PM

  Crasholeth
This picture of a car crash in Spokane is a pretty good shibboleth or Rohrschach test.



What does this picture contain?

Labels: Leth

  ¶ 11:28 AM

  Ummoleth
Satan always starts a sentence with Ummmmmmmm......

This has been obvious for at least 15 years. It became grotesquely murderously obvious during the holocaust. Any time you see this demonword (or variants) at the start of a written message, you know without reading the rest that the message was written by Satan, using force and verbal violence to destroy truth and culture and civilization.

For clarity, this doesn't apply to speech. Humans often start sentences with various hesitation sounds, without knowing it or intending any meaning.

Labels: endless hell, Leth

  ¶ 6:17 AM

  Proving his own point
This article by Timothy Dalrymple discusses the polarizing of evangelicals. He runs through the nature of belief and trust, showing how we move toward one set of beliefs without fully realizing the movement. He maintains an admirable level of balance and objectivity, but then gives away his own 'belief window' without realizing it.

Objectivity and empathy:

Claims that once seemed impossible to contemplate came to appear conceivable, then plausible, then reasonable, and finally self-evident. Of course conservatives would sacrifice thousands of innocent lives to justify a “war for oil” because conservatives are greedy and that’s what conservatives do. Of course liberals would sacrifices thousands of children in order to advance their own health and power because liberals are perverse and that’s what liberals do.

Revealing his own belief window:

Evangelicals find themselves torn between social media platforms and legacy media sources that openly advocate progressive causes and cancel conservative voices and far-right sources that traffic in paranoia and misinformation.

NOW I SEE.

Labels: Leth, NOW I SEE

  ¶ 1:46 AM

  Where are the insurers, yet again....
I've been asking this question since 2008, when ZIRP took down insurance and pension funds INTENTIONALLY. Why were the insurers silent? They're a HUGE and RICH industry, with plenty of lobbyists and influence. They specialize in quantifying and predicting. They understand compound interest and exponential curves better than anyone else. They avoid bad models and stupid assumptions, because bad models are unprofitable. Profit comes from agreeing with reality, which makes insurance the most realistic and scientific of all industries. But they allowed ZIRP to continue forever.

This article by a RETIRED actuary compares the AIDS panic with this year's "virus" holocaust. He gets everything right, with an insider perspective.

Best of all, he doesn't play the stupid People can't estimate risk game.

In both cases the virus was largely confined to specific populations, and EVERYONE KNEW IT. There was never any reason to assume "equal opportunity". Viruses are specialists.

I spent the next several months developing mathematical models of the spread of infection, and applying them to official health statistics, which were provided under free subscription by the Centers for Disease Control in their Weekly Surveillance Report. And, like anyone who has worked with epidemiological models during an emerging infection, I came to understand that early-stage projections are not neutral; they have an intrinsic and marked tendency towards exaggeration of whatever threat they’re applied to.

The reason is that with any new health condition, early infections and deaths naturally occur among the most susceptible parts of the population. With AIDS, there were clearly-defined and relatively small groups of people who were at very high risk, and almost all of the early cases were among members of those groups. As the disease spread to the much larger lower-risk parts of the population, overall rates of infection and death fell significantly.

When unrepresentative infection and death rates derived from early data are projected into the far future their effects are greatly amplified, just as a rifle fired at a distant target will turn a tiny error in aim into a miss by miles. And once the projected rates have been translated into numbers of deaths for a population of millions we end up with apocalyptic forecasts that can’t help but induce panic.

Many scientists spend their careers searching for eye-catching results, and it must be extremely difficult to choose to tone down the few that do occur, especially when they apply to a novel and high-profile disease. The temptation to believe you’ve discovered a genuinely awful and important truth is a powerful one. The Royal College of Nursing certainly couldn’t resist: in 1985, they predicted that one million people in Britain would have AIDS within six years. But by 1990, the cumulative total was less than 5,000.

In both cases the insurers knew that the EXPONENTIAL projections were wrong and destructive, but they didn't step up to resist.

ANY TIME YOU HEAR AN EXPERT CLAIMING THAT A NATURAL PHENOMENON IS EXPONENTIAL, YOU KNOW INSTANTLY AND PERFECTLY AND TAUTOLOGOUSLY THAT THE CLAIM IS WRONG AND THE EXPERT IS A MURDEROUS CRIMINAL. NATURE IS NOT CAPABLE OF DOING EXPONENTIALS.

Silence can't be good for profits. In 1980, and even more now after Romneycare, insurers are the main payers for medical care. When projections are wrong, insurers will spend more for unneeded tests and appointments for people who really didn't need to worry. And in the current holocaust insurers will end up spending HUGELY more for serious cancer treatment, which would have been cheaper if caught early.

I'm glad THIS actuary (RETIRED) chose to use his SKILL to clarify the situation.

But the question remains: Why didn't the insurance companies speak out IMMEDIATELY at the time when their authority and lobbying could have made a difference? They could have saved a whole lot of expense for themselves, and could have saved MILLIONS of lives in the current holocaust.

For insurers, profit and saving lives are PARALLEL goals. In earlier decades insurers often lobbied for regulations to improve safety and health. Home and business insurers have always helped customers avoid theft and fire and other hazards. Auto safety regulations were started by an insurance-financed research project in 1956. Fuckhead Nader managed to put his brand on the project for self-aggrandizement, but it was really a cooperative effort by insurers and universities.

Labels: Leth, Real World Math

  ¶ 6:10 AM

  Hormesis is life
More wisdom from Lukashenko, the only sane leader in the world.

The young generation of Belarusians who have grown up in a peaceful country and have not faced real difficulties yet, can hardly make the right assessment of what has been done in Belarus over the years of independence, Belarus President Aleksandr Lukashenko said as he gave an interview to Russia's leading mass media.

“As they say, especially in Ukraine, Belarusians have not experienced a real trouble yet. When they do, they will know what misfortune is all about. I would not want my country and my people to go through it. However, when I am alone I start thinking: maybe, today's generation of Belarusians should go through something to be able to understand the system they are living in and to size up and appreciate what has been done. They have nothing to compare it with… Indeed, there is Ukraine, some other countries. But it all seems so faraway, not here.”

The difference is obvious in the faces of crowds reacting to Lukashenko. Older people are deeply thankful, younger folks are respectful but not thankful. They don't seem to realize that they are the LUCKIEST PEOPLE IN THE WORLD.

And why are they lucky? BECAUSE WE CAN SEE THEIR FACES. NOBODY IS WEARING MURDER MASKS. ALL OF THEM CAN FUCKING BREATHE. Who would have ever thought that BREATHING would be a unique privilege granted to only FOUR FREE AND BLESSED nations???????????????????????

= = = = =

A new neurology study shows that this experiential difference goes far deeper than attitude. Researchers compared Africans who had suffered through the Lord's Army rebellion in Uganda and the genocide in Rwanda, versus similar Africans who hadn't been traumatized. They found that an epigene strongly related to memory of bad events and PTSD was switched oppositely in the non-trauma and trauma people.

Immunity and hormesis work in all areas. Encounter a virus, build T-cells that fight it. Encounter a horrible situation, build genes that fight it.

What we have now in the UNLUCKY countries is a horrible situation, not a virus. The demons who are creating the horrible situation have avoided responsibility and justice by blaming a "virus" for their satanic evil.

People who are actually following Satan's orders never say "The devil made me do it", even in jest. They always frame an innocent person or ordinary fact of Nature. Framing is a Satanoleth. When Inslee or Trump says "The virus made me do it", you know that in fact the devil made him do it.

Labels: Jackboot NOT stomping forever, Jackboot stomping forever, Leth, Natural law = Soviet law

  ¶ 6:06 AM

  Distractoleth
Via ZH:

Mayor Jenny Durkan said at a news conference that the violence was distracting from changes sought by thousands of peaceful protesters seeking to address racial inequity and police brutality. She said the city is working with the community to bring the “Capitol Hill Occupied Protest” zone to an end.

This is an absolute and perfectly consistent shibboleth.

Any time you hear a politician or corporate spokesman saying that violence DISTRACTS FROM the virtuous cause that allegedly inspires the violence, you know you're listening to a demon.

Violence and crime are bad. Sometimes violence is necessary in self-defense, but it's still bad.

In these 'distracting' situations, there's never any self-defense. The violence is aggressive and unnecessary. The protesters are not seeking "changes". When the police agree to the allegedly desired "changes", the protests get stronger, which tells you that they weren't seeking the "changes". They're only seeking CHAOS AND MAYHEM AND DEATH.

If you can't say that bad is bad, you're bad.

Labels: #bluelivesmatter, Leth

  ¶ 8:45 AM

  Wrong failure
Headline from "Skeptical" Inquirer:

Psychics Oddly Did Not See a Pandemic Coming

Wrong point. The epidemic is nothing special. It happens every year with one type of respiratory virus or another. It kills people who are ready to die from one pathogen or another.

The fortune-tellers can't be blamed for failing to warn us about an annual event, because it's nothing unusual or special. When dying people die from one brand of virus instead of another brand of virus, it's not news.

What the psychics failed to see is the total holocaust "justified" by the annual epidemic.

Or did they? I don't know, and don't feel like spending time on the question, but it's a question worth asking. Run through Youtube astrologers during 2019 and see if they converge on a prediction of total tyranny starting in Feb 2020.

After a quick glance at my favorite rapturite, I can see that the survey would be difficult and time-consuming. Psychics are ALWAYS predicting one type of apocalypse or another, and they're right in a general way. Deepstate has been forcing a chronic apocalypse since 1975, with periodic acute phases. This year's acute phase is the worst yet, with worse still to come after we briefly and partially "recover" from this phase. That's how psychopaths work. Unless we rid the world of psychopaths, we're all dead fairly soon.

Answering this question would require a lot of detailed listening and checking of captions to find the exact timing and shape of the prediction, and then to see if many psychics converged on that exact timing and shape.

Overall I'd rather trust astrologers than paid "scientists". Repeating from 2017:

= = = = = START REPRINT:

How do you know which side of a "debate" is good?



"Scientists" jail you for questioning "science".

Astrologers don't jail you for questioning astrology.


MDs force you to follow orders by withholding life-sustaining prescriptions. (In any other context this would be called extortion.)

Alternative healers don't force you to do anything.


Social "scientists" design and operate torture chambers.

Psychics and faith healers don't.


Non-smokers jail you for smoking in the wrong place, which is pretty much every place.

Smokers don't jail you for not smoking.


Bankers jail you for using cash.

Goldbugs don't jail you for using debit cards.


Globalists bomb you for questioning the Empire.

Localists don't bomb you for being a globalist.


The non-jailing and non-bombing and non-interventionist side of each debate is good. The jailing side is bad. Jailoleth.

= = = = = END REPRINT.

This year I need to add a new Jailoleth to the list, except it's not really a pair.

Epidemiologists jail and starve healthy normal people, and release criminals from all rules and laws.

.... But there isn't a well-formed opposing vector, as with the previous alternations. There isn't a named or defined 'alt-epidemiologist'.

Ordinary people with ordinary scientific literacy have been trying to counteract the epidemiologists, but we don't have a Guild or a Title or a Profession. We're just lovers of reality and lovers of LIFE, trying to defend real science and LIFE from all the Guilds and Titles and Professions who have unanimously joined the holocaust.

Labels: Asked better than answered, Leth

  ¶ 10:59 PM

  Breed-standard alien
This grotesque alien blob verifies all the assumptions about alien Mascoid holocausters.

It also agrees with my long-term observations of aliens. They always show their lower teeth.

Labels: infinite infinite infinite infinite evil, Jackboot stomping forever, Leth

  ¶ 9:56 AM

  Centre for = Satan
Any time you see an organization named "Centre for ___" you can be sure it serves Soros.

Nice little example. ZH published an article on dissatisfaction with democracy, written by the newly founded Centre for the Future of Democracy.

The brief article, the leadin or hook for public consumption, sounds benign. Seems to be advocating different systems of voting. It never mentions the real purpose of the Centre.

Newly founded is a good clue to the real purpose, and the real purpose appears instantly when you read the full report.

Across the globe, democracy is in a state of deep malaise. In the West, growing political polarisation, economic frustration, and the rise of populist parties, have eroded the promise of democratic institutions to offer governance that is not only popularly supported, but also stable and effective.

Got it. Populist parties are destroying democracy.

No surprise. When Experts in Centres use the word democracy they mean Absolute unquestioned rule by Experts in Centres.

Populist parties intend to break up the Centres, so populist parties are the destroyers of democracy.

This particular Centre, of course, was newly founded when the people voted three times for Brexit. As long as the government continued to ignore the voters, Britain was safe for democracy. When Boris decided to obey the voters, democracy died.

Labels: Leth, Sorosia

  ¶ 12:10 AM

  Egnor misses part of the point
Egnor discusses the failures of mind-less science:

Panpsychists and cosmopsychists like Goff are right about this: Consciousness of some sort permeates the universe and is at the core of our humanity. Materialism is a kind of madness — it is the denial of the most undeniable thing about reality.

But the universe itself is not conscious, nor are inanimate objects. Whether plants are conscious in any sense is doubtful, I think, but it is at least debatable. Animals are obviously conscious, as are we. What cosmopsychists like Goff see correctly is that fundamental reality is more like a Mind than it is like mindless matter. Plato, Aristotle, Plotinus, Aquinas, and countless other philosophers have made the same point.

No major argument there, just one quibble. I don't think you can leave plants out of the mind circle; they use sensory inputs and memory to make decisions.

The only externally observable evidence of awareness is REM sleep, so complex animals like vertebrates and cephalopods are the only provable mind-owners. This doesn't exclude other living things.

Modern materialism, from which our denial of consciousness springs, was formulated by Francis Bacon (1561–1626) and his immediate predecessors in the early modern era. They denied the reality of formal and final causes in nature. They argued that science could only deal with material and efficient causes — stuff hitting stuff, basically.

This is a diminished view of nature, as quantum mechanics has made painfully obvious. It is also entirely unnecessary. Scientists who wish to focus their research on material and efficient causes are free to do so. They can do good (if not profound) science with these impoverished tools.

Here Egnor misses the real problem with recent science. Engineering and some parts of biology are properly and simply materialistic. In all the theory-based parts of Big Science, especially physics, materialism is gone. Gaia has replaced God. Everything is driven by Gaia, an intelligent goddess who uses the tiny micropercent of CO2 to create purposeful and complex effects.

This is not materialism, it's fallacious spiritualism. It's witchcraft or homeopathy, attributing all action to a tiny fractional SINFUL IMPURITY with massive spiritual power.

Labels: defensible spaces, Leth, Smarty-plants

  ¶ 5:38 AM

  Satan gets tired
Satan dba "Rod Dreher" is normally a sneaky slithery slimy Satan, serving Soros stealthily.

Yesterday, writing at Soros-sponsored TAC, he pulled his usual sneaky stuff. He discussed a "friend" who was having theological qualms about accepting the ABSOLUTE UNIVERSAL TRUTH OF GODDESS GAIA. Commenters immediately popped in to defend God from Gaia, so Satan dba "Dreher" posted an update saying that he would instantly spike all comments attempting to defend truth or God.

It's always nice when Satan takes off the Walker Percy mask and lets us see his horns and hear his roar and smell his Soros sweat.

Later he apparently got tired of spending all his time Rectifying, and just removed the whole article.

Labels: Carbon Cult, Leth

  ¶ 10:59 PM

  Knowledge is power
Chafee, who is mostly silly and ineffectual, just did something serious that gathered my respect. In an RT interview he showed a copy of the original 9/11 Authorization of Force, complete with penciled revisions and crossouts. He noted that the document empowered BUSH, not simply a president, to decide which countries to obliterate.

It says "He shall determine", not "He or she shall determine." Chafee pointed out that all Federal documents have been gender-neutral for a long time [and legal documents have been neutral even longer, for simple precision]. The use of he meant that Congress was sending the authority to Bush the man, not just Current Occupant Of White House.

Chafee has done God's work. Power flows from the file cabinet of a blackmailer. Deepstate runs on secrets and extortion and honeytraps. Elections are utterly meaningless, and even money and status can be overruled easily by blackmail.

Any politician who claims to be 'independent' or 'anti-establishment' MUST start by popping blackmail bubbles. Tell us something we don't know, give all the details, and explain the implicit interpretations. Chafee did it, and I respect him.

Your turn, Tulsi, though I don't think you're up to the task.

Labels: Leth

  ¶ 4:53 PM

  Layer upon layer upon layer
Caitlin Johnstone is the sneakiest of all the Deepstate operatives. She gets a lot of things right in this piece.

She starts by listing all the people who should be assumed as CIA (or other Deepstate):

Take off the revolutionary’s mask, and it’s the CIA.
Take off the terrorist’s mask, and it’s the CIA.
Take off the news man’s mask, and it’s the CIA.
Take off the filmmaker’s mask, and it’s the CIA.
Take off the professor’s mask, and it’s the CIA.
Take off the billionaire’s mask, and it’s the CIA.
Take off the whistleblower’s mask, and it’s the motherfucking CIA.

Good list, but you forgot one.

Take off the "climate" activist's mask, and it’s the CIA.

Semantically speaking, this is contained within revolutionary, but Caitlin explicitly excludes "climate" revolutionaries.

She lists all the steps we should be taking to "solve the climate crisis". These steps sound good. Basically eliminate the stock market and central banks and monopolistic capitalism.

Why is this list sneaky? The steps are good, but if we are primarily working for "climate change", we won't actually take any of those steps. We will implement the Green New Deal, which requires MMT, the exact opposite of productive real-value economy. Financiers are the FOUNDATION of Deepstate. Their goal is to eliminate all life and value and beauty and productive activity from the earth, leaving only abstract numbers processing abstract numbers.

One commenter got it, but cited a lengthy and paywalled report written by LaRouche as proof. You don't need to cite questionable and unavailable sources. The CIA itself wrote the "climate" manifesto in 1975, and its orders are being carried out visibly.

Labels: Carbon Cult, Leth

  ¶ 10:59 PM

  Gimme Shannon
Strikes me that a slight variation on the Thiel question is a good test for people who claim to be "ex"Deepstate, or "whistleblowers" against Deepstate.

The original Thiel question:

Tell me something that's true that nobody agrees with you on.

My looser version:

Tell me something that's true that nobody else knows.

= = = = =

Variation to test the EXness of "ex"Deepstaters:

Tell me something that's true that I don't already know.

Intel agencies use this question intensely and rigorously to test claimed defectors from enemy intel. We should use it for the same purpose, since CIA and FBI and NSA are enemy intel.

"Ex"es always tell us things that we already know, or give us unnecessary details about things that we had already guessed. This is NOT Shannon information.

Shannon information is fully surprising and unexpected, totally unguessable and undeducible from existing knowledge. Shannon is consequential, not trivial. When you act on Shannon information, things change.

We could formalize this by gathering (online or in person) a jury of UNPAID NONEXPERTS who have some experience dealing with aspects of Deepstate. People who have been involved in "radical" activities where CIA or FBI planted APs, or people who have worked in tech areas where NSA's tentacles are visible. Require the "Ex" to tell us something that is fresh and surprising to all jurors.

Labels: Asked and worth asking again, Leth

  ¶ 11:56 PM

  How do you know it's Soros?
I was fooled too many times by "color revolutions", so I tried to pin down the Soroleths.

It comes down to three criteria. None are absolute, but taken together they form a pretty good leth.

Number 3 is the clincher.

1. If the protest is covered heavily and steadily by Sorosian media, it's Soros. By comparison, the Yellowvests have been largely ignored.

2. If the protesters are in a country that is doing pretty well, or a section of a country that is prosperous compared to the rest, it's Soros. Catalunya and Hong Kong are comparatively prosperous. The Yellowvests represent poor parts of France.

3. If the protesters are fighting over an obscure issue that doesn't affect their real lives, it's Soros. Obscure issues = the name of Macedonia or an extradition law or "global warming". The Yellowvests were fighting over taxes that ruined their already precarious livelihood.

Labels: Leth, Sorosia

  ¶ 4:14 PM

  Blockoleth
Listening to an interview with McAfee. He says a lot of uniquely realistic things about life. He talks all the time about privacy and freedom, but he sells Bitcoin.

Exact opposites. Bitcoin places you directly inside NSA.

Is he too dumb to realize it? Well, he's supposedly the original programmer of his eponymous antivirus system. Serious programmers recognize the fraudulent nature of blockchain, and a programmer who worked specifically with viruses should recognize it even more sharply.

Either he's faking the programming experience, or he's a false prophet.

This particular type of falseness is not new, as I noted before. The populists of 1880 to 1910, led by Jennings Bryan, were false prophets. They diagnosed the problem correctly, but recommended moving toward a Nixonian floating currency and toward increasing debt. They claimed to hate the banks but served the banks.

A real populist starts first by BREAKING the power of banks, not increasing it. Deepstate has three legs: Banks, Intel plus data, and Leftist activists. These legs were built in the 1890s and continue to the present. The banks are the foundation. Intel and activists are auxiliaries.

FDR started by breaking the banks. He's our only true populist.

= = = = =

Later and better thought: There's a third possibility. McAfee simply doesn't give a fuck about consistency. He's a REALIST. He knows that nobody uses logic, nobody listens, nobody analyzes. Discussion and persuasion are perfectly futile, though they may be fun for the participants. Bitcoin is a way to make money, so he uses it.

Labels: Leth, Pluponents

  ¶ 12:30 AM

  Bye, Tulsi
I've been cautiously and tentatively** supporting Tulsi because her WORDS seemed to be on the right side ... while watching carefully for contrary indications. I've been fooled TOO MANY TIMES, and by god I'm not going to be fooled again.

Here's the perfect contrary indication.

News item:

“Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey followed up his earlier 2019 donation to Andrew Yang — by giving several thousand dollars to Rep. Tulsi Gabbard’s presidential campaign and another thousand to Yang. According to the FEC filings for Tulsi NOW, Dorsey donated $5,600 — the maximum donation — to Gabbard the day after the first Democratic debate.”

Bye, Tulsi.

@Jack is deep deep deep deep dark dark dark dark Deepstate. He knows EVERYTHING. If @Jack thinks you're worth supporting, I can be 10000000000000000000% certain that you're a nasty vile warmongering monstrous alien genocidal faker. Just another AP like Trump.

** Well, maybe not so cautiously on a percentage basis. I gave $50 to Tulsi's campaign, which is 1/3000 of my net worth. @Jack gave $5600, which is one millionth of his net worth.

Labels: Leth

  ¶ 1:04 PM

  Good prediction after all
The early stages of any communication technology inspire grandiose elite fuckheads to dream of a world where everyone is reduced to elite fuckhead idiocy.

A new item at American Radio History contains a beautifully horrible example. Arnold's 1933 handbook of advertising includes a chapter on the glorious promise of television. The author imagines the TV Utopia that awaits us in 1940:

I can easily anticipate special music of the operatic type written exclusively for broadcasting. No longer will it be necessary to compress a three-hour presentation of some famous opera into the period of an hour. Much of this will apply to our commercial programs of the future.

Instead of being a miscellaneous collection of disassociated items brought together for the sake of holding the attention of an audience for a limited time, there will be presented musical, dramatic and educational programs written for presentation where both eye and ear reception will be taken into account.

Jesus. What a grotesque monster. NOBODY really likes LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG operas. Fashionable fuckheads watch LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG operas because it's the fashionable thing to do. Radio could ALREADY present LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG operas in 1933. Short pieces weren't compelled by technical limitations; short pieces were compelled by HUMAN NATURE.

Normal people have other things to do. They listen to radio while washing dishes or changing diapers or fixing the car. They want ENTERTAINMENT, which means DISTRACTION from the dull hard stinky necessities of life. Radio in 1933 was already doing a damn good job of providing sane and clean entertainment, including a lot more classical music and serious discussion than any mass media provides now.

When the 1940 that I have described shall have arrived, we are likely to be in the midst of a new social and economic order.

Shall have is an excellent globaleth, a symptom of satanic neocon grammarrhoids.

New social and economic order is awfully familiar. In 1933 one new social and economic order was well underway in Stalin's Russia, and another new social and economic order was starting in Hitler's Germany.

Nations will no longer be disassociated units, but may be convened on a few hours' notice at a conference where views may be exchanged and visible indications of approval witnessed.

The perpetual idiotic dream of participatory democracy. Modern "libertarians" have finally achieved it. A conference where views may be exchanged and visible indications of approval witnessed is PRECISELY Facebook's stated mission. Exchange verbatim repetitions of Correct views, hit the Like button. Try to exchange an Incorrect view, and the conference disassociates your unit.

So this fuckhead was a good predictor after all, but his prediction wasn't the utopia that he idiotically imagined.

= = = = =

Later: No, I'm wrong. No paradox, no irony, no failure. The new social and economic order IS utopia for fuckheads like Norman Corwin and this author. They are in charge of the utopia. That's the whole fucking point. Exterminating billions of Deplorables IS utopia for demonic psychopaths.

Labels: #DeplorableLivesMatter, Entertainment, Leth

  ¶ 12:06 AM