Insufficiently paranoid again
As usual I was insufficiently paranoid.

When I heard that the Bureau of Instigation had "interviewed" the Orlando dude, I figured they were trying to get a sting going but decided he was too smart. Like other gang leaders, FBI prefers low-IQ or weak-minded stingees who will follow orders easily. I dismissed the notion of FBI influence on his eventual acts.

Right about the facts, wrong about the influence. An insider knows better:

“It looks like it's pretty much standard operating procedure for preliminary inquiries to interview the subject or pitch the person to become an informant and/or plant an undercover or informant close by to see if the person bites on the suggestion,” Coleen Rowley, a former FBI agent and division counsel whose May 2002 memo to the FBI Director exposed some of the FBI’s pre-9/11 failures, told AlterNet. “In the case of Mateen, since he already worked for a security contractor [G4S], he was either too savvy to bite on the pitch or he may have even become indignant that he was targeted in that fashion. These pitches and use of people can backfire.”

In everyday life, suspicions and worries often turn out to be groundless. But when dealing with USA STRONG, facts always turn out to be worse than any paranoia I can develop.

Labels: Age of Stings

  ¶ 1:43 AM

  Something doesn't ring true...
Michael Lewis, who wrote a tell-all on the 2008 economic panic, has done the same for the 2020 holocaust. Tucker of AIER, who revealed the ONLY publicly known fact so far, doesn't like Lewis's book.

Why? Because Lewis treats the monsters as heroes.

Okay... but he did get some facts into the record, regardless of viewpoint. Mein Kampf is a valuable book regardless of viewpoint because it tells us what Hitler was thinking.

Here's the part that smells wrong: Tucker seems to have KNOWN everything that Lewis wrote. He's not surprised by any of it. The story apparently pivots on the monster named Carter Mecher, the Bioterror fuhrer who pulled the trigger on March 12. Tucker gave us this one piece of info, and now it sounds like he knew the rest of the story.

Why didn't he TELL it from the correct viewpoint? Why did he wait for Lewis to tell it from the wrong viewpoint?

I haven't read the book, so I'm undoubtedly missing a big part of the picture. The part I can see is unattractive. Maybe Tucker is really complaining about stolen thunder? Was he getting ready to publish?

= = = = =

Later and semi-separate: The fact-gatherers are getting excited about a batch of emails from Demon Fauci. As usual they're insufficiently paranoid, insufficiently realistic.

FOIA never reveals NEW info. Deepstate never reveals any data that isn't already out in public. A quick skim of the material shows the standard pattern. Demon Fauci, like Demon Trump, plays all sides of an issue at once. He has publicly stated everything that appears in the emails. The emails show the same Room 101 as his public spewings.

One of the fact-gatherers is using a more productive code-breaking technique, focusing on the names that were redacted in the published emails. If he can figure those out, he will generate new info.

We still don't know anything about the lengthy WORLDWIDE PREPARATIONS AND REHEARSALS AND BLACKMAIL that were needed to line up a million bureaucrats and officials into a single precise attack on all humans.

When every leader in the world pulls the same trigger on the same weapon on the same day, it's not groupthink or random, and it takes a lot more than one reply-all email. Especially when the weapon is precisely opposite to EVERYTHING the "medical" "profession" has been saying and doing for 200 years.

Unfortunately the fact-gatherers are all obediently focused on the China lableak crap, which always struck me as a false flag. Plain fact: Since 1946, all evil originates from US and UK. We always frame someone else for our crimes, sometimes China, sometimes RadicalIslamicTerror, usually Russia.

= = = = =

This separate FOIA may be more productive since it shows how the CDC was molding policy to suit Randi Weingarten, head of the teachers union. The fact itself has been circumstantially clear for a while, but the detailed emails firm up the connection with less redaction of names.

Labels: Answered and unasked

  ¶ 10:16 AM

  For once!
For once I'm not the insufficiently paranoid one!

Wikileaks offered a 'poll', more likely just a clickbait, asking people what type of info Wikileaks should offer a reward for. What kind of leak is most important?

Lots of responders want to see Hillary's medical records.

Stupid. Powerful people can control their medical records. They know that the HIPAA thing is just a blackmail game, and they own at least one full-time doctor. You're not going to see anything meaningful. In the special case of Hillary, we've observed 40 years of expertise in hiding info and suiciding opponents.

I'd rather trust accidental remarks by insiders who didn't stop to think about leakage.

Hillary's wife Huma gave us all the info we need in one casual remark: "She's often confused." We don't need to know the cause. Whether it's a stroke or a concussion or Parkinsons, the simple FACT of frequent confusion should disqualify a leader instantly.

Wanting health records is naive in the same way as Ron Paul's insistence on "auditing" the Federal Reserve. Even if you could trust those accounts, an "audit" wouldn't DO anything meaningful. WE ALREADY KNOW THE FED IS A CRIMINAL SYNDICATE. WE HAVE PERFECT INFORMATION AND PERFECT EVIDENCE from simple observation. The only correct response is to close it down and jail all of its employees. That's what we do with criminal syndicates.
  ¶ 2:57 PM

  I suppose
I guess we should wait till the official midnight deadline, but it's obvious by now that Deepstate is not going to release any of the JFK info.

Assange thinks Deepstate is trying to make Trump look weak. Insufficiently paranoid interpretation.

Government agencies stopped obeying Trump in early March. Disobedience is simply constant and normal now. They KNOW he's weak. They KNOW he's the sweetest plumpest bitch they've ever fucked.

We'll never know what event made them switch at that point or what they feared before that point.

Did Trump give them an explicit vow of obedience, or did they try a couple of test fucks to see if he would fight back? Before March 6, did they think he might be willing to use blackmail from his hotel chain's cameras?

Details and words are irrelevant. Only observed behavior counts.

Later and better thought: The "released" files are also irrelevant. Deepstate has been sorting and cleaning and rewriting them for 54 years. Nothing useful remains. Any release through official channels is either meaningless or intentionally disinforming. Only unwanted leaks provide information, and all potential leakers from 1963-65 were silenced or removed a long time ago.

Few hours later: Watching the 'alt media' mice nibbling on FBI's bait. One thing that stands out clearly in the docs is FBI's constant and permanent hatred of anti-Communists. The Bureau has always been obsessed with catching Christians and honkies and southerners. Basically any non-NYC type is a criminal and a subversive in FBI's eyes. These old interviews with "KKK" types include lots of juicy "info" about the bullet and the autopsy and Oswald's links, and the mice are treating the info as valid new leads worth exploring. Nope, it's just the latest way of catching Christians and honkies and southerners. SNAP!

A day later: Still nothing new in this stuff. ZH describes it as shocking. Yeah, but all of these shocks have been revealed before in various books and articles. The Wikileaks load of CIA docs from the '70s had a lot more previously unknown info about Deepstate operations. (Oops, previously unknown info is redundant since information explicitly means something you didn't know before!)
  ¶ 3:32 PM

  Simple truth
When I first started rethinking the Cold War in 2010 I didn't have many facts. I was going by a 1944 book that looked at Eastern Europe objectively. As always my guesses were insufficiently paranoid... to put it EXTREMELY mildly.

A newly available radio series offers a possible answer. War Telescope, now available at OtrCat.com, was a series of 15-minute programs on NBC, aired weekly through the war years, hosted by Elmer Peterson and Morgan Beatty. All of the segments provide a mix of insight into wartime life and speculation about the coming peace. Many of these insights have been lost in current thinking.

"A European View of the War", aired 2/26/44, may contain the answer to the Stalin puzzle. It focuses on the diplomatic community in Europe, who considered America to be an unstable and unreliable ally. [Robert Parker's 1944 book echoes these concerns.] Our military had saved Europe's ass in WW1 and WW2, but before and between the wars our government had failed to form an intelligent and coherent foreign policy. Would we hold steady after this war, helping the other Allies to conclusively and decisively punish Germany? Or would our financiers and industrialists fall back to their natural preference for Germany, carrying Congress with them as they had done in the 1930s?

From this angle it's easy to see why Stalin wanted to have a firm hand on American policy, wanted to insure that the United Nations Organization served Russia more than America. From this angle, letting America return to normal meant letting Germany return to power. It wasn't mainly about Communism; it was mainly about Russian and European national interest.

Now that I've seen more facts, the explanation is simpler. America and Germany are ALWAYS trying to obliterate Russia. Sometimes we take turns, sometimes we work together. Stalin was simply and fully correct.

Labels: switchover

  ¶ 12:39 AM

  What came loose?
Couple weeks ago I wondered why the 'fix' came loose on the R side but not the D side. For 40 years both parties have been running on autopilot, with the next election predetermined the day after this election. This year the Ds remained on autopilot. No matter how many votes Bernie gets, Hillary is the candidate. But the Rs lost the mechanism. They allowed Trump to accumulate actual votes.

Way too often I've been caught off guard by big events (eg the 2008 Goldman Coup) because I was insufficiently paranoid. So I try to jack up the paranoia, not always successfully.

In that spirit:

What came loose? Scalia died while taking a bribe. That's a simple fact. He also may have been doing something more interesting. Why would a man with an attractive wife and all the perks and prestige of total power need to spend time in an all-male ranch?

Both "sides" treated this unsavory event as nothing special. Clearly all the Supreme Satans take bribes all the time, and all of them engage in fun and frolic that wouldn't be appreciated by Unpersons. Best to keep the whole thing silent.

The Jeb and Hillary script was going to end up in a photo finish, which was going to be decided by the Supremes in favor of Jeb. It was Jeb's turn. After Scalia croaked, the Grandé Finalé Episodé of this miserable series came unglued. All bets for Jeb were uncertain, all powerseekers who counted on automatic Jebness suddenly had to rethink their future. Reciprocally, powerseekers who were riding with Hillary saw a brighter future, doubled down on the cruise control, and closed the windows and locked the doors to keep Bernie out.

Labels: defensible spaces

  ¶ 4:43 AM

  Yottachutzpah
The Official Media Line this morning is that DNC corruption does not exist because Russia.

"If this was a Russian hack, it goes well beyond previous uses of hacking, etc etc etc"

Massive chutzpah.

You "journalists" are the DIRECT DESCENDANTS, and some of you are the ACTUAL PERPETRATORS, of a PREVIOUS Russian hack of American elections. Watergate.

The Washington Post and NPR used Watergate to rebuild "journalism" into a Soviet force, and then used the force to destroy America.

In 1948 Nixon offended you for reasons that were both personal and political; and then he offended you politically in 1972 by pulling out of Vietnam and warming up to China.

Vietnam was a Soviet effort to accomplish two goals: Get America to fight China, and keep America weak and divided. It worked nicely until Nixon came along and tried to flip the field.

You got your revenge when insufficiently paranoid Dicky thought he could continue using the same dirty tricks that had worked so well for JFK and LBJ. TRADEMARK THEFT! Those were YOUR methods! How dare he!

Now that your satanic force owns everything, a transformed Russia that resembles the pre-Watergate Christian America is supporting a candidate who wants to bring back some elements of the pre-Watergate Christian America.

HERESY! BLASPHEMY! RUSSIA IS TRYING TO UNDO ALL THE EVIL THAT YOU WORKED SO HARD TO ACHIEVE! MUST KILL!

Labels: swishover, switchover

  ¶ 6:46 AM

  Reprint
More and more "independents" are getting shut down because they were INSUFFICIENTLY PARANOID. They might have talked about Deepstate but they clearly didn't think Deepstate existed. Now they're finding out.

Some of them are facing barrages of lawsuits from individual rich satans who have Deepstate on their side. Others are losing the servers that they RENTED from satanic corporations.

Semi-reprint from a few months ago:

If you want to be a powerful independent voice, you need your own separate platform. This was true in the era of printing presses and still true now. The only difference is that we have forgotten the truth!

An editor who wanted to counter the establishment paper didn't expect to rent the big paper's presses and Linotypes. He knew that renting would limit his freedom. He bought his own press and equipment.

He certainly didn't expect the big paper to PAY him for using their press. Modern "independents" are shocked when Youtube stops PAYING them for using Youtube's equipment. This is just silly.

The Aberree is an excellent example. In 1954 Alphia Hart wanted to edit a periodical to counter the Hubbard cult and discuss related subjects in the 'spiritualist' camp. He knew in advance that he wouldn't be able to rent the services of the Enid News-n-Eagle or Cromwell Press. He knew they wouldn't touch the subject. Partly because it was uncool, mostly because Hubbard sued anyone who questioned his cult. No business wants to stand in front of a bulldozer. So Hart bought a mimeograph, rented a storefront, and got up and running. He later upgraded his equipment after he was making a bit of money. He was then able to make more money by printing and mailing material for other independent thinkers.

When government starts to shut things down OFFICIALLY, there's no solution. But so far that isn't happening. So far the campaign is lawsuits by individual rich fuckheads and collective action by the corporate branch of Deepstate. The solution to this threat is the same as Hart's defense against Hubbard's lawsuit machine. Have your own press or servers in your own building.

Labels: Aberree, defensible spaces, defensible times

  ¶ 7:32 AM