In most software — and by “most” I mean nearly all — we call failures “bugs.” Bugs are things developers are expected to fix. If software has a bug, it’s broken and needs repair. Unless, of course, it is artificially intelligent software. Then, we may be told, it’s not broken. It’s “being deceptive.” Deception requires intention, purpose,…a mind. There is no mind present in the machine with the power to deceive. So when AI delivers a wrong, or unexpected, result, it is a bug.Yes. This is simple. Dixon gets it exactly right. Still, it raises a separate question. What if part of the system is genuinely alive and you don't realize it? In earlier telegraph systems, the earth was the return wire. Lots of living things are interpolated between sender and receiver, including some very BIG and very SIGNAL-INTENSIVE living things like the fungus networks that tie forests together. A mycorrhiza network could "eat" our signals and "poop" them out as altered signals to suit its own purposes. If it learned to eat at certain times of day when the most important signals (stock market closing reports) were coming through, the result would be genuinely intelligent.
Labels: Morsenet of Things, Not AI point-missing
The current icon shows Polistra using a Personal Equation Machine.