Monday, September 02, 2019
OpSec vs Disney
Lately my web 'home page' has been Strategic Culture. They carry several writers who GET IT. Zuesse analyzes the failing aggressors of the West and the defensive gathering of the East more accurately than anyone. Ehret describes the history of Deepstate and the unique example of FDR better than anyone except me. (Why be fake modest?)
I think SC is related to LaRouche, who has a distinctly cultish flavor. Nevertheless, truth is truth. When you can verify BY EXPERIENCE that an author tells the truth, it doesn't matter what else or who else he favors. Any old port in a storm that destroys all facts and logic.
One of the SC authors is making an interesting proposal or plea to Russia. Tim Kirby wants to see Russia competing with Hollywood. He points out correctly that Hollywood serves to spread our pathogens sneakily, breaking through the defenses of every nation and infecting it with our massive evil.
From the defensible spaces / defensible cases viewpoint, I can see why Russia doesn't bother to be Disney and in fact CAN'T be Disney.
As I wrote a few days ago,
Some Russian leaders have been infected by foreign culture and tried to turn Russians into foreigners. Peter tried to make Russians into Frenchmen and failed. Yeltsin tried to make Russians into NYC and failed. Putin has returned to the natural and effective position of immune defense.
Russia's existing propaganda organs are not doing a good job of immune defense. The problem is the opposite of Kirby's diagnosis. RT and SputnikNews are doing a poor job because they're ALREADY copying Hollywood. They sound just like CNN and Fox. They are carrying SOROS and NYC values instead of Russian values. The only exception is Deepstate's psychotic accusations against Russia. RT defends weakly against those, but it defends within an inconsistent Sorosian background.
The old Radio Moscow did a better job of displaying real Russian attitudes and culture, but it had to express the culture in terms of official atheism.
Lately my web 'home page' has been Strategic Culture. They carry several writers who GET IT. Zuesse analyzes the failing aggressors of the West and the defensive gathering of the East more accurately than anyone. Ehret describes the history of Deepstate and the unique example of FDR better than anyone except me. (Why be fake modest?)
I think SC is related to LaRouche, who has a distinctly cultish flavor. Nevertheless, truth is truth. When you can verify BY EXPERIENCE that an author tells the truth, it doesn't matter what else or who else he favors. Any old port in a storm that destroys all facts and logic.
One of the SC authors is making an interesting proposal or plea to Russia. Tim Kirby wants to see Russia competing with Hollywood. He points out correctly that Hollywood serves to spread our pathogens sneakily, breaking through the defenses of every nation and infecting it with our massive evil.
From the defensible spaces / defensible cases viewpoint, I can see why Russia doesn't bother to be Disney and in fact CAN'T be Disney.
As I wrote a few days ago,
Often-invaded cultures and languages like Russia develop sophisticated complexities that are impossible for invaders to understand.A sophisticated and dense culture simply can't be spread by Disney. It's too closely tied to the land and the people and the religion.
Invading cultures like USA and invading languages like English are simple and crude. We are the pathogen, so we don't need to defend against other pathogens.
Babel tells us that God wanted modularity, not universality. Why? To protect us against both physical and cultural pathogens.
Globalists FORCIBLY break all of these defensible spaces and cases. Globalists want one universal language and one universal culture and one universal mindset. Why? So the Imperial pathogen can spread into all lands. Globalists are like the seed-pod fungus.
Some Russian leaders have been infected by foreign culture and tried to turn Russians into foreigners. Peter tried to make Russians into Frenchmen and failed. Yeltsin tried to make Russians into NYC and failed. Putin has returned to the natural and effective position of immune defense.
Russia's existing propaganda organs are not doing a good job of immune defense. The problem is the opposite of Kirby's diagnosis. RT and SputnikNews are doing a poor job because they're ALREADY copying Hollywood. They sound just like CNN and Fox. They are carrying SOROS and NYC values instead of Russian values. The only exception is Deepstate's psychotic accusations against Russia. RT defends weakly against those, but it defends within an inconsistent Sorosian background.
The old Radio Moscow did a better job of displaying real Russian attitudes and culture, but it had to express the culture in terms of official atheism.
Labels: defensible cases, defensible spaces, Sorosia
¶ 12:28 AM
