I missed two points
I've made this analogy a couple times before but completely missed TWO main points. Now I've caught both.

= = = = =

What I didn't miss: All organized protests are traps, stings, APs. If you're responding to a Clarion Call with specific instructions, you're falling into a trap.

The only exception is a protest you make entirely on your own, against a subject that nobody else is pushing. For instance, I might get passionate about Dropbox's upcoming elimination of its Public folders, which makes it slightly more difficult to host videos on a blog. I might go to Dropbox's headquarters and start picketing. Guaranteed that nobody else is bothered about this, so it's not a trap. It's just stupid and completely pointless. Nothing will happen.

If the protest is organized and scheduled, it's a trap.

= = = = =

First point that I missed: The biggest traps have two entrances.

When I made the analogy earlier, I compared the current protests with the 1969 antiwar movement, which got serious and organized IMMEDIATELY after Nixon was elected. The obvious purpose was to catch and destroy rebels. I got caught in that trap and ended up in jail. Nixon also got caught because he was blamed for cracking down on the rebellion. He didn't get caught for being antiwar, because he didn't halt the war until the war was lost.

Rebels were one side of the trap. Nixon was the other.

In the modern case, rebels are one side and Trump is the other. Direct parallel, except that Trump is blamed for NOT cracking down on the rebellion. Irrelevant. Deepstate doesn't care about the HOW. Any old HOW will serve as long as the proper WHO is exterminated.

(Both Nixon and Trump CLAIMED to be antiwar. Both were loyal warmakers in PRACTICE. It's possible that both were actually working for Deepstate; both volunteered as chief shitcatcher in response to some combination of monetary reward and blackmail. This possibility doesn't really alter the fact of the two-entrance trap, so it's sort of null.)

= = = = =

The other thing I didn't see earlier:

I was thinking that the '69 trap and the current trap are opposite in intention. The '69 college administrators were non-hippies who hated hippies. They "needed some muscle here", so they called on Phi Delts to "crack some hippie heads." The current situation is different. Admins are hippies who hate non-hippies, and they're calling on Antifa and Soros groups to "crack some fascist heads".

Now I see. Not opposite at all. In both eras the administrators are GLOBALISTS. They are serving the builders of empire, and the rebels are against aggressive imperial wars. The rebels of the two eras had other things on their minds ALONG WITH imperial wars, and those other things are unquestionably different. But the administrators aren't really worried about the incidentals. For them the only thing that counts is Global vs National. USA STRONG must control everything. Rebels don't want USA STRONG to own everything, so they must die.

Continued here and then here.

Labels: #DeplorableLivesMatter, Make or break, STRONG!

  ¶ 11:45 PM