Cottage people
The benefits of being 'independently poor'.
Two things happened yesterday.
(1) I finally got a handyman to replace a piece of metal siding that had popped off in the July-August windstorms. The metal siding encases an original layer of cedar siding, so it wasn't exposing anything structural, but it looked awful and invited a chain-reaction popoff. Used Angieslist to find and deal with the
handyman. Very satisfactory experience, and now that the house is proper again, I feel more like
cottage people than shack people.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0725a/0725a72f951bab2dff244bbf6e9e101da07acf87" alt=""
(2) Learned that the publisher of my courseware has suddenly sold off the whole division including my stuff, as part of their JPMorgan hostile-takeover-bankruptcy process. The new publisher might or might not continue with this project. So I've just put in a year of 50-hour weeks, brought the project close to completion, and may never get paid for it.
Which event matters to me? (1) Pride of property. The publisher shit doesn't bother me a bit.
This is exactly why I set up my life
this way, starting with a plan in 1985. I can take or leave idiot New York Goldmanite assholes.
Independently poor. DECOUPLED.
= = = = =
Oddly enough, I was thinking about writing a piece on the destruction of human capital by feral Goldmanism. I was going to extend
recent thoughts about soil conservation into the notion of conserving human capital. When you run a business for pure share value, you have no regard for training, no regard for developing a labor force. Everything is outsourced, everything is temped, everyone is disposable.
Now the publisher has given me a nice personalized example.
Labels: Shack people - Cottage people, the broken circle, Zero Problems