Friday, December 11, 2020
  More rambling on GenRad

Since I'm on a GenRad kick today, I'm still puzzled by pricing for calibration equipment. There's a whole lot of GenRad on Ebay right now, and it divides sharply between regular 'vintage electronics' pricing and 'luxury goods' pricing. The 'vintage' pricing makes sense for hobbyists and collectors who prefer old equipment.

I noticed the difference several years ago when I bought my 1565B sound level meter from Ebay. The 1565B is the successor to the 1565A shown in previous item, and seems to have started around 1973. It's still being produced and sold now. Same functions in a smoother package, like the change from Ford Fairmont to Taurus. I bought mine for $50, and the new ones from IET are $3500. It was an excellent deal at $50. Still functions perfectly, still usable for real science.

The difference makes sense when you're buying from IET, which continues the GenRad services. You're basically paying a retainer for legal services to a company that will back up your claims of accuracy in a regulatory or legal conflict.

The difference doesn't make sense for the Ebay items seen now.

Example: Standard inductors, all fairly old-looking and all simple devices, range from $1000 down to $200. Both are supposedly tested. Some listed as 'parts only' are also around $200. None of them are from an official calibrating service like IET, so they don't include a 'lawyer retainer'. For comparison, plain non-standardized inductors from Jameco range from 50 cents up to $2.50 for a fancy one. Unlike sound level meters, there isn't any practical use for standardized inductors. You can't possibly use them in a real circuit. Even in the '30s when everything was bigger, these giant boxes couldn't have lived inside a radio. You'd only need them for QC testing if you were manufacturing fancy coils, and in that case you wouldn't be buying through Ebay.

= = = = =

After detailing the meter face in my model to match the original more closely, I wondered why the meter says "DECIBELS. SOUND LEVEL METER." Seems like unnecessary clutter in a small space. When you're using the SLM, you know it's an SLM and you know you're measuring dB. The lawyer aspect illuminates the reason. Before computers and web-connected equipment, you'd create an evidentiary chain by photographing the meter along with the factory or highway you were measuring. The photograph is better evidence if the name of the tool and the meaning of the measurement are intrinsic. The upper dials are also designed for photographic clarity, so you can include the weighting and band setting in the closeup. (As shown nicely by the picture on the front of the GenRad booklet below.)

COBOL was designed with the same purpose in mind. "Overly verbose" code is self-documenting, making it easy for auditors to check what the program is trying to do.

Was this internal metadata technique widespread in instrumentation? I don't think so.

It's certainly common in other legalistic uses of photography. Mugshots always include a title card with the name and other data, often held in the suspect's hands for 'intrinsicness'. Cities used to document real estate for tax valuation with photos. Each house had an easel in front carrying the relevant info.

Skimming through GenRad catalogs, I don't see any other uses of the technique. The later 1565B, the 'Taurus', no longer has the label, and the weighting is done by pushbuttons that woudn't be easily visible in a photo. The classic Bruel & Kjaer 2203, from the same era, comes close to the same labeling and grouping for photo clarity:



Considering the added value of this design in the intended legalistic use of instruments, it's surprisingly rare.

= = = = =

Separate random note: The manuals for all of these old instruments are easily available online in PDF form. I can get all the info and pix I need to "build" the models, including details of meter faces. When I was working in academic labs, whether acoustics or speech and hearing, we RARELY had manuals for old equipment. Sometimes I was able to write to the manufacturer for schematics, sometimes not. Mostly I had to figure stuff out on my own. I don't know where the manuals went; maybe grad students took them, maybe profs kept them in their offices. In either case the manuals weren't kept with the equipment.

Later and even more rambly: The 1565A struck me as unusual because the meter face is white on black. Most meter faces are black on white. The other applications of intrinsic metadata are also white on black. Mugshots and property tax photos formerly used blackboards, white chalk on black slate. More recent mugshots use 'marquees' with magnetic letters, also typically white on black. Is there a photographic reason for this? Can't find it online. Discussions of UX seem to think that white on black is more readable to the eyes, but I can't find any comments related to film photography in old periodicals. White on black is NOT more readable to my eyes.

Labels: , ,

 


<< Home

blogger hit counter
My Photo
Name:
Location: Spokane

The current icon shows Polistra using a Personal Equation Machine.

My graphics products:

Free stuff at ShareCG

And some leftovers here.

ARCHIVES
March 2005 / April 2005 / May 2005 / June 2005 / July 2005 / August 2005 / September 2005 / October 2005 / November 2005 / December 2005 / January 2006 / February 2006 / March 2006 / April 2006 / May 2006 / June 2006 / July 2006 / August 2006 / September 2006 / October 2006 / November 2006 / December 2006 / January 2007 / February 2007 / March 2007 / April 2007 / May 2007 / June 2007 / July 2007 / August 2007 / September 2007 / October 2007 / November 2007 / December 2007 / January 2008 / February 2008 / March 2008 / April 2008 / May 2008 / June 2008 / July 2008 / August 2008 / September 2008 / October 2008 / November 2008 / December 2008 / January 2009 / February 2009 / March 2009 / April 2009 / May 2009 / June 2009 / July 2009 / August 2009 / September 2009 / October 2009 / November 2009 / December 2009 / January 2010 / February 2010 / March 2010 / April 2010 / May 2010 / June 2010 / July 2010 / August 2010 / September 2010 / October 2010 / November 2010 / December 2010 / January 2011 / February 2011 / March 2011 / April 2011 / May 2011 / June 2011 / July 2011 / August 2011 / September 2011 / October 2011 / November 2011 / December 2011 / January 2012 / February 2012 / March 2012 / April 2012 / May 2012 / June 2012 / July 2012 / August 2012 / September 2012 / October 2012 / November 2012 / December 2012 / January 2013 / February 2013 / March 2013 / April 2013 / May 2013 / June 2013 / July 2013 / August 2013 / September 2013 / October 2013 / November 2013 / December 2013 / January 2014 / February 2014 / March 2014 / April 2014 / May 2014 / June 2014 / July 2014 / August 2014 / September 2014 / October 2014 / November 2014 / December 2014 / January 2015 / February 2015 / March 2015 / April 2015 / May 2015 / June 2015 / July 2015 / August 2015 / September 2015 / October 2015 / November 2015 / December 2015 / January 2016 / February 2016 / March 2016 / April 2016 / May 2016 / June 2016 / July 2016 / August 2016 / September 2016 / October 2016 / November 2016 / December 2016 / January 2017 / February 2017 / March 2017 / April 2017 / May 2017 / June 2017 / July 2017 / August 2017 / September 2017 / October 2017 / November 2017 / December 2017 / January 2018 / February 2018 / March 2018 / April 2018 / May 2018 / June 2018 / July 2018 / August 2018 / September 2018 / October 2018 / November 2018 / December 2018 / January 2019 / February 2019 / March 2019 / April 2019 / May 2019 / June 2019 / July 2019 / August 2019 / September 2019 / October 2019 / November 2019 / December 2019 / January 2020 / February 2020 / March 2020 / April 2020 / May 2020 / June 2020 / July 2020 / August 2020 / September 2020 / October 2020 / November 2020 / December 2020 / January 2021 / February 2021 / March 2021 / April 2021 / May 2021 / June 2021 / July 2021 / August 2021 / September 2021 / October 2021 / November 2021 /


Major tags or subjects:

2000 = 1000
Carbon Cult
Carver
Constants and variables
Defensible Cases
Defensible Times
Defensible Spaces
Equipoise
Experiential education
From rights to duties
Grand Blueprint
Metrology
Natural law = Sharia law
Natural law = Soviet law
Shared Lie
Skill-estate
Trinity House
#Whole-of-society

Powered by Blogger