Another meaningless audio hack
This recording is making the rounds. Dr Roger Hodkinson, with impeccable credentials in Alberta, is telling the absolute precise truth in a Zoom conference call.

There's nothing unusual or secret or surprising in what he's saying. Every human with a brain has known every bit of this since March. He's saying it especially clearly and powerfully, and his specific credentials would normally give his words authority.

There are several questions about the hack itself.

We don't know who Hodkinson is talking to. It sounds like a "public comment" session where some agency is required to let the usual cranks and gadflies make noise for a while. The only other name mentioned is S. Peterson, who was supposed to be the next commenter but wasn't on the line, so Hodkinson jumped in. The names of the actual participants and agency are not mentioned.

The call controller is clearly bored and "humoring the crazies", signaling the real people that they can sit back and jack off like Toobin.

Why was the hack released? Was it intended to show that the government is hearing the facts, and thus has no rational excuse for continuing to violate the facts?

If so, it's meaningless. The Public Death Officers already know the facts. Before March, they were functioning normally and performing the correct REAL PUBLIC HEALTH procedures for other diseases. The Public Death Officers are able to conduct the holocaust with perfect efficiency BECAUSE THEY KNOW WHAT THEY'RE DOING. If they didn't already understand how to maintain immunity, they wouldn't be taking PRECISELY EVERY STEP NECESSARY TO UTTERLY ERADICATE IMMUNITY AND HEALTH. They'd miss a few things.

So the government doesn't need to be informed, and can't be pardoned for "cluelessness".

I notice that Youtube hasn't removed the clip and hasn't plastered it with the usual flashing neon THIS IS DISINFORMATION sign.

Simplest answer: The hacker is an insider who is discrediting Hodkinson, preparing to purge him and disbar him.

More complex answer: The hacker has vested interests in another company that provides tests, and wants to push the agency into choosing his company instead of Hodkinson's company.

Even more complex: The call itself is a sting, set up from the start to discredit Hodkinson. There wasn't any real meeting.

Labels: Asked and unanswerable

  ¶ 10:36 PM