Sophisticated essay
Recently someone has found and uploaded a batch of previously unseen episodes of Mike Barnett aka Follow That Man aka Man Against Crime. I enjoy the series, so I've been eagerly watching these newly found episodes before bedtime.

In these 1952 episodes Barnett is the same actor playing the same character, but the other actors are an entirely unfamilar group, and the scripts have a different flavor from the existing episodes.

This one about a reported UFO is a remarkably sophisticated essay on Experts vs Non-Experts, credentialism, and skeptics vs useful idiots vs paid trolls. All types are represented, and much of the dialog is heard verbatim in every modern Facebook discussion.



The character who sees the UFO first is a schoolteacher volunteering in the Ground Observer Corps. He handles the trolls EXACTLY RIGHT. No arrogance, no condescension, admits his own doubts, invites them to try and see it for themselves.

At the end Barnett has exposed most of the UFO action as a hoax, but reminds us that the original sighting was verified by radar and remains unexplained. Sophisticated!

The only completely UNfamiliar part, as with this radio show from the same era, is the role of a "Newspaper Man". The "Newspaper Man" is realistic and cynical, willing to sensationalize things for profit, but unwilling to spread harmful rumors that will damage reputations or cause unneeded deaths.

Nobody performs this task in current society. We do have things called "Newspapers", but their job is the exact opposite. I don't know if the "Newspaper Man" really existed back then, or if the character is pure science fiction like the fake/unfake alien.

= = = = =

The sophistication led me to some probably OVERsophisticated thinking. Why would ALL the Public Death Officers and ALL the doctors in the world agree to ruin their own authority as Experts forever? Before the "racism" riots, a handful of fools were still believing what the PDOs and MDs said about this alleged "virus". Now everyone knows that everything said by PDOs and doctors is not just false but genocidally holocaustally false. It's hard to imagine a blackmail threat strong enough to influence ALL of these experts to destroy their own authority. Kill a few million people? Sure. Easy. No persuasion needed. Delete your own credentials? Not so easy.

Given the basic fact that Deepstate always plans and intends all consequences, this ruination of credentials must have been part of the purpose, along with ruining all the people and governments and economies and cultures in the world.

Was there a specific reason for this total destruction of expertise? Was there a real decision by PDOs and doctors on some unrelated subject, perhaps a trivial subject, that needed to be pre-emptively canceled? A decision about a pharmaceutical product that would change its Share Value by a few cents to cover a Soros short? Or is the destruction of authority just part of Soros's bucket list?

= = = = =

Later, after sleep and walk, a much less sophisticated and more VALID thought. Whether the PDOs and Doctors of Murder intended to crash their own credentials is not the proper point. The proper point is that THESE CREDENTIALS HAVE BEEN FRAUDULENT FOR MANY MANY MANY YEARS. NOW WE SEE THAT THEY ARE FAKERS AND FRAUDS AND QUACKS.

This is PURE EMERSONIAN JUSTICE. The murderous frauds and genocidal quacks have showed everyone what they are. Now we're free to find NON-MURDEROUS healers, whether Naturopaths or Chiropractors or Hindu Acupuncturists or whatever. Repeating something I wrote a few years ago but forgot in the idiot passion and panic of the moment:

= = = = = START REPRINT:

How do you know which side of a "debate" is good?


"Scientists" jail you for questioning "science".

Astrologers don't jail you for questioning astrology.


MDs force you to follow orders by withholding life-sustaining prescriptions. (In any other context this would be called extortion.)

Alternative healers don't force you to do anything.


Social "scientists" design and operate torture chambers.

Psychics and faith healers don't.


Non-smokers jail you for smoking in the wrong place.

Smokers don't jail you for not smoking.


Bankers jail you for using cash.

Goldbugs don't jail you for using debit cards.


Globalists bomb you for questioning the Empire.

Localists don't bomb you for being a globalist.


The non-jailing and non-bombing and non-interventionist side of each debate is good. The jailing side is bad. Jailoleth.

= = = = = END REPRINT.

Labels: Emersonian justice, NOW I SEE

  ¶ 9:22 PM