Tuesday, May 26, 2020
Finally a GUILD response... but not here
During the long "global warming" monstrosity, and now during the "branded flu" holocaust, I've been asking steadily:
WHERE ARE THE GUILDS?
Where is the IMMUNE response from real scientists against the LETHAL MURDEROUS INFECTION OF SCIENCE by the psychopath-ogens of politicians? Who is defending the PERMANENT PROFESSION AND REPUTATION of science against the misuse of science by genocidal monsters?
Here's one competent GUILD response in Brazil. A letter written by Marcos Eberlin and 20 others. The signers are all CURRENTLY EMPLOYED scientists with lots of peer-reviewed citations. They place their names and pictures on the letter, placing their good reputations on the line. Most of the pictures show people in mid-career, not idealistic beginners.
During both monstrosities we've had occasional responses from RETIRED officials or RETIRED scientists. No good. If you were able to see this problem, why weren't you complaining about bad science when you were employed? Why didn't you use your authority to MODIFY BUDGETS toward real science? After you're retired, you're no more meaningful than any blogger or twitterite.
The strong opening:
During this pandemic, the term “science” has been used “ad nauseam”, that is, has been repeated to exhaustion: “Science, science, science”, “I’m pro-science”, “For from the science, through the science and to the science I guide my decisions and acts” and “I am, therefore, fully right to do so”. It is clear that the intention here is to lead all of us to the idea of decisions based on something unquestionable and infallible, as scientific as law, as the law of gravity. Groups of “science experts” or famous YouTube scientists, many of them still “beginners” in science, some of them with a minimal or no experience in fighting pandemics, are selected by the establishment and the media to give “scientific aura” for the lockdown. Rarely, there are situations in which we reach consensus in science, even a momentary consensus. Some defend the “Big Bang” and the theory of evolution, others, including myself, are skeptical of them. Some defend with data and papers the central role of men in global warming, others defend, with the same data and papers, that human activity is irrelevant. Scientists are human beings, therefore, skeptics and enquirers who can and should speak for themselves, like all scientists have the right to do, but NEVER A SCIENTIST OR A GROUP OF THEM CAN DECLARE TO BE AUTHORIZED TO SPEAK IN THE NAME OF SCIENCE!Here's the GUILD part:
Who then speaks here in the name of “science”? Which group has a monopoly on reason and its exclusive authorization to be the spokesperson of “science”? Where is such authorization found? One can choose an opinion, and base his strategy on it, this is fine, but no one should commit the sacrilege of protecting his decision risking to tarnish with it the “sacred mantle of science”.The English isn't quite perfect, but the logic and the SCIENCE are perfect. Will we ever see a similar response in US or UK? No. I don't even need to ask the question. = = = = = Incidentally, it sounds like Bolsonaro is playing the same slimy game as Trump, probably learned from Trump. Giving satanic governors and mayors the green light to imprison and starve their own people, then pretending he doesn't like what they're doing. Talking out of both sides of his devilmouth, having his bloodcake and eating it. Psychopath's wet dream.
Labels: Answered and unaskable, infinite GOOD
¶ 11:29 PM
