Monday, March 11, 2019
Camouflage is not a weapon
More hysteria about RUSSIAN_BOTS:
In the second fucking place, all sorts of things "modulate the brightness of the light". Clouds, birds, passing airplanes, spotlights, and ESPECIALLY television screens.
In the third fucking place, there's NOTHING NEW about using changes in light for camouflage. Fog machines and smoke generators were common weapons in WW1 and WW2.
Spotlights were also used. From a WW2 account of tank warfare:
Disguising a target is a DEFENSIVE action, not an AGGRESSIVE action. Russia always tries to defend first before aggressing. We do the opposite. We attack everything except Israel and Saudi, for no purpose except universal murder and genocide.
= = = = =
Broader thought: When we are truly being attacked by an enemy, we don't need to make up bizarre delusional fantasies about the enemy's imaginary superweapons. We know the enemy's actual weapons because we are being bombed and shot by the enemy's actual weapons. When we are NOT being attacked, we make up lunatic myths to create the false IMAGE of an enemy attack. We are "modulating the light" of our TV screens to "agitate" the brains of our people. Earlier I analyzed the pattern of propaganda vs real attacks.
¶ 12:34 AM
More hysteria about RUSSIAN_BOTS:
The non-lethal Filin can be used at night or during twilight and is said to be effective from up to two kilometres away. In tests, volunteers who had the weapon turned on them found it was impossible to aim a firearm at a target protected by it. A fifth experienced something like a hallucination and about half noticed “signs of spatial disorientation, as well as nausea and dizziness”. The device is said to agitate the optic nerves of the enemy by modulating the brightness of the light.In the first fucking place, vertigo is NOT caused by "agitating the optic nerves", whatever that means. The optic nerves are just wires. Vertigo can come from many different stimuli, including imagination and memory, and involves many different parts of the brain.
In the second fucking place, all sorts of things "modulate the brightness of the light". Clouds, birds, passing airplanes, spotlights, and ESPECIALLY television screens.
In the third fucking place, there's NOTHING NEW about using changes in light for camouflage. Fog machines and smoke generators were common weapons in WW1 and WW2.
Spotlights were also used. From a WW2 account of tank warfare:
During the nights, after the tanks and infantry had dug in, the tankers employed powerful spotlights to help defend their positions. Two men would pull guard and when motion was detected or a noise heard, the light would be flashed on the area. It temporarily blinded the enemy and made them easy targets for our fire.This "new" weapon looks a whole lot like an old light semaphore blinking Morse.
Disguising a target is a DEFENSIVE action, not an AGGRESSIVE action. Russia always tries to defend first before aggressing. We do the opposite. We attack everything except Israel and Saudi, for no purpose except universal murder and genocide.
= = = = =
Broader thought: When we are truly being attacked by an enemy, we don't need to make up bizarre delusional fantasies about the enemy's imaginary superweapons. We know the enemy's actual weapons because we are being bombed and shot by the enemy's actual weapons. When we are NOT being attacked, we make up lunatic myths to create the false IMAGE of an enemy attack. We are "modulating the light" of our TV screens to "agitate" the brains of our people. Earlier I analyzed the pattern of propaganda vs real attacks.
¶ 12:34 AM
