Thursday, September 06, 2018
Famous?
Now this is INTERESTING. Astronomy is one area of science that I don't follow much, partly because it no longer deals in THINGS THAT ARE HERE. The public news-making side of astronomy is all about SCHIZOPHRENIC PSYCHOTIC DELUSIONS like "dark matter" and "string theory" and "dark energy" and "multiverses." These are THINGS THAT DO NOT EXIST AND CANNOT EXIST.
For once we have a public news-making item about a truly fascinating THING THAT IS HERE.
Above Saturn’s north pole, clouds swirl in a distinct and stunning hexagonal shape. Discovered by NASA’s Voyager mission in 1981, Saturn’s hexagon is striking to behold, and one new study suggests that this six-sided vortex may actually be hundreds of kilometers tall. Now, as part of a new study using Cassini data, researchers have discovered, for the first time, a high-altitude vortex forming at Saturn’s north pole. This vortex was spotted as the planet’s northern hemisphere approached summertime. And it has a hexagonal shape like the famous hexagon originally discovered closer to the planet’s surface. These findings suggest that the high-altitude vortex may be influenced by the low-altitude vortex, potentially forming an immense, tall tower, according to a statement.The video is indeed stunning. The center is a familiar vortex, like a tornado or hurricane, but it forms a stable and semi-permanent hexagon outside the center. Nothing in Earth weather forms simple polygons. Famous? Might be famous among academics, but it's NOT famous to outsiders. It should be! Maybe you'd get more public support if you'd focus more on THINGS THAT ARE HERE and less on the bizarre monstrous fantasies in your own "heads" or whatever you have in place of heads. = = = = = Calmer thought: This fits all the criteria for inter-species communication. If the Saturnians, or some distant planet that had gained magnetic control of Saturn, wanted to send a CQ to Earthlings, this would do it. An unmistakable signal of life imposing structure on chaos. It could even be an answer to our first CQ, which had a lot of Euclidean content.
Labels: Carver
¶ 7:46 AM
