CRC, HFT, 1876
Think ciphers in blockchain are new? Think HFT algos are new? Fool.
From an
1876 book on Banking Telegraphy.
How to set up your own book code:
How to form a checksum to verify that the original message was sent accurately:
Codes for every purpose, including passing and evaluating rumors:
= = = = =
There is
ONE HUGE DIFFERENCE between these old codes and the new Blockchain ciphers.
The 19th century folks UNDERSTOOD FULLY that their messages were passing through the hands and eyes of telegraphers (and later phone operators); and they understood that the messages were carried on open wires that anyone could tap. Competitors, cops, mobs, anyone.
Modern Bitcoin fools not only FAIL TO UNDERSTAND that their messages are passing through NSA, they even more stupidly fail to appreciate that their "mining" is solving crypto equations for NSA. Unpaid labor for the supposed "enemy". Some of us have been preaching about this for a
LONG TIME.
DIY book codes have served for an EVEN LONGER time and can still serve, provided you know how to distinguish between NSA territory and your own territory. In fact DIY codes are the ONLY possibly secure method of communication. If both ends have arranged the choice of book beforehand, via private totally verbal conversation in an electronics-free location, and both sides acquired the book offline through garage sales or similar, and both sides rigorously keep the book away from all cameras, you've got something like security. There are even better alternatives using pieces of Nature or shared memories. If both sides share a memorized system of turning locations and actions to numbers, any reference to any standard object or picture will do.
There's no point in preaching this to the Bitcoin fools and the MMT fools. They have been hypnotized by Deepstate's frontmen like Max Keiser and Bill Black. Good old
Prosperity Gospel. Works every time.Labels: MMT