Sunday, April 08, 2018
Is unbiased news possible?
Yes. It's ALWAYS possible to write a strictly objective story, though you may have to leave out some dubious parts. Even BBC is capable of objectivity sometimes. I've noted their Travel department's wonderfully objective pieces about Oklahoma, which I can verify from direct knowledge.
Today their coverage of the Hungarian election is precisely neutral. None of the words or phrases include hidden assumptions or hidden biases. Gold standard of objectivity. Especially dramatic since Orban is the best and strongest opponent of BBC's demonic alien monsterbosses Soros and Juncker, so the writer had to try SERIOUSLY HARD to reach this standard.
Compare with France24's coverage, which appears neutral but contains lots of loaded words and unstated assumptions about the inherent necessity and goodness of Sorosian genocide.
Aside from these, the usual suspects are pouring out the usual volcanic spew of vile filthy bigotry against Orban and against sane human beings.
One not-quite-usual suspect has done a beautiful job of confessing and convicting itself. The Intercept, which started out a few years ago with a pretty good fake show of independence, has gradually revealed itself to be just another branch of CIA/NSA/CNN/MSNBC/FOX/NYTIMES/ETC. Today's article on the election is the best and clearest evidence of pure demonic Sorosian omnicide at the Intercept.
Later: Orban wins, which isn't a surprise. When given a real choice, people will always pick a candidate who has PROVED his competence and sanity. Performance counts.
¶ 9:51 AM 
