During the Cold War, Pope Saint John Paul II said that the world policy of nuclear deterrence was judged as morally acceptable. Last month, you said to a conference on disarmament that the very possession of nuclear arms was to be condemned. What has changed in the world that led you to make this change? What role have the episodes and the threats between President Trump and Kim Jong Un had on your decision? What would you say to politicians that do not want to renounce their nuclear arsenals nor decrease them?Reply from idiot Antichrist:
What has changed? Irrationality has changed (has increased). The encyclical Laudato Si comes to mind, the care of the created, of creation, from the time of John Paul II to all this many years have passed. How many? Do you have the date? (82) 82, 92, 2002, 2012…34 years. In the nuclear field, in 34 years it has gone beyond, beyond, beyond, beyond, and today we are at the limit.What does beyond, beyond, beyond, beyond mean? IN FUCKING FACT it means that the number of nuclear weapons has DECLINED from 60,000 in 1982 down to 10,000 now. In those 34 years the total has been divided by 6. If Antichrist thinks 10k is the LIMIT of irrationality, then Antichrist should specify how much INCREASE is necessary to restore rationality. Back to 60k? More than 60k? Up to 60 trillion? Fucking idiot. = = = = = Sidenote: Look at 1960 on this graph. In 1960 another Roman idiot campaigned on the "missile gap" which he claimed was in Russia's favor. IN FUCKING FACT, USA had about 20k warheads and Russia had about 1k. The "gap" was actually in our favor by a factor of 20. Similar Roman math.
Labels: Loughnerian Logic
The current icon shows Polistra using a Personal Equation Machine.