Why hasn't this happened?
Why hasn't Deepstate abolished juries?

In practice jury trials are rare, about 5% of all trials... but this ISN'T because Deepstate consciously tried to eliminate them. It's just a practical and sane response to basic facts.

Fact: 95% of crimes are so fucking obvious that even the criminal doesn't want to argue about it. Requiring every case to run through a jury would waste an ungodly amount of time on fake discussion of absolute certainty.

Plea bargaining works because pro criminals understand that juries will give them harder time. As I observed in my three jury services, young cocky amateur criminals often believe they can beat the lowly squares until they stand in the courtroom and FACE a hundred pairs of hostile eyes. The cockiness wilts and the lawyer (who certainly knew what would happen) is ready to start the plea process.

In short, this is a NATURAL self-sorting system that works pretty damn well, considering all the obstacles placed in the road of justice by Federal black-robed demons and their Sorosian agents.

Juries are the last remnant of common law governance, the last place where real citizens can exert any power at all, AND the last place where police and citizens who defend themselves from criminals can be freed from Deepstate's relentless drive to obliterate self-defense.

Three strikes as seen by Deepstate. Why are juries still holding the bat?

= = = = =

Well, I spoke too soon as usual. A few hours before I wrote the above, this article appeared in "American" "Conservative" online. A Sorosian copkiller operating as usual under the label of "Libertarian" is trying to discredit juries because juries help cops defend us from criminals. Clearly the start of a campaign with several flanks.

Labels: defensible spaces, engineer-guillotine

  ¶ 3:58 AM