Friday, September 29, 2017
Perpetual globalism
From an overly dramatic article on bugging and tapping in 1965....
Credit where due: the author makes it clear that he's closely affiliated with Deepstate. No pretense of being 'just an ordinary citizen'.
He starts with a dramatic incident, designed to show Russia as the enemy.
Note first that the author calmly accepts the equation diplomat = spy. This has been true for many decades, but modern commentators still pretend to be shocked that embassies are nothing more than spy stations.
Note second that Schwirkmann, the "hero" of this episode, STARTED THE FIGHT by INVADING RUSSIAN TERRITORY under the guise of a repairman and installing a LETHAL WEAPON AGAINST RUSSIANS ON RUSSIAN TERRITORY. Act of war.
The author is shocked that the Russians DEFENDED THEMSELVES against this ACT OF WAR.
Still the same. Shocked that the Russians were smart enough to detect our lethal shock gadget in an ANALOG system, and shocked that the Russian dared to DEFEND themselves against our lethal shock. Hint: Russians are smarter than us anyway, but Russians in that era were ESPECIALLY smarter because they were sticking to analog while we were suicidally moving to digital.
After the dramatic start, the author lists a bunch of allegedly invasive bugs in more ordinary places, including:
Fuck. The intercom wasn't a bug and it wasn't "without the knowledge". We knew that the office could listen in. When a teacher needed to use the bathroom or take a sick student to the nurse, she'd pull the string and ask the principal's office to monitor the room for a few minutes. Not spying, just an efficient use of technology.
"Teachers suspected of liberal views and other heresies".... Now we start to see where the author is driving.
And now the author reaches his destination. The pattern seems to be:
1. Russia is bad.
2. Anyone who opposes Russia is bad.
Contradiction?
No, because Russia isn't the real object of the second premise. The reality of globalist intentions and attitudes HAS ALWAYS BEEN:
1. Russia is bad.
2. Anyone who exposes Deepstate's fake Russian "agents" and "meddling" and "interference" is bad.
McCarthy and the Birchers were not primarily working against Russia, they were working against "Soviet" "subversives" who were run by CIA.
Still the same.
¶ 11:03 AM 
Note first that the author calmly accepts the equation diplomat = spy. This has been true for many decades, but modern commentators still pretend to be shocked that embassies are nothing more than spy stations.
Note second that Schwirkmann, the "hero" of this episode, STARTED THE FIGHT by INVADING RUSSIAN TERRITORY under the guise of a repairman and installing a LETHAL WEAPON AGAINST RUSSIANS ON RUSSIAN TERRITORY. Act of war.
The author is shocked that the Russians DEFENDED THEMSELVES against this ACT OF WAR.
Still the same. Shocked that the Russians were smart enough to detect our lethal shock gadget in an ANALOG system, and shocked that the Russian dared to DEFEND themselves against our lethal shock. Hint: Russians are smarter than us anyway, but Russians in that era were ESPECIALLY smarter because they were sticking to analog while we were suicidally moving to digital.
After the dramatic start, the author lists a bunch of allegedly invasive bugs in more ordinary places, including:
Fuck. The intercom wasn't a bug and it wasn't "without the knowledge". We knew that the office could listen in. When a teacher needed to use the bathroom or take a sick student to the nurse, she'd pull the string and ask the principal's office to monitor the room for a few minutes. Not spying, just an efficient use of technology.
"Teachers suspected of liberal views and other heresies".... Now we start to see where the author is driving.
And now the author reaches his destination. The pattern seems to be:
1. Russia is bad.
2. Anyone who opposes Russia is bad.
Contradiction?
No, because Russia isn't the real object of the second premise. The reality of globalist intentions and attitudes HAS ALWAYS BEEN:
1. Russia is bad.
2. Anyone who exposes Deepstate's fake Russian "agents" and "meddling" and "interference" is bad.
McCarthy and the Birchers were not primarily working against Russia, they were working against "Soviet" "subversives" who were run by CIA.
Still the same.
¶ 11:03 AM
