Sunday, August 27, 2017
Assange still doesn't get it
Assange twitter:
"Left infatuation with online censorship has now led to pervasive on online censorship of the left. I warned you."
He links an article on the 'World Socialist' website which DOES get it. Even after reading and linking the article, Assange misses the point.
Google is manipulating its Internet searches to restrict p ublic awareness of and access to socialist, anti-war and left-wing websites. The World Socialist Web Site (www.wsws.org) has been massively targeted and is the most affected by your censorship protocols. Referrals to the WSWS from Google have fallen by nearly 70 percent since April of this year.ANTI-WAR is the key. Left and right, liberal and conservative, had some meaning in earlier centuries, but since 1946 there is only one** variable. Globalist vs non-globalist. The globalist tripod: Banks, Intel agencies, and leftist groups. All official "parties", and all politicians who are allowed to take office, are globalist. All work for the benefit of Five Eyes. All work for finance. All work for monopolistic corporations. Most of the official "parties" and politicians have a leftist branding, but the branding is irrelevant. I'm not familiar with this World Socialist party. I don't need familiarity. Google has told me which side WS is on. Google wants to eliminate WS from its library and advertising mechanism, so WS is anti-globalist. It's not a backfire as Assange thinks. The old First They Came For routine doesn't wash. Deepstate doesn't destroy every group, it only destroys groups that oppose Deepstate. Deepstate doesn't care if you defend the "rights" of a brand you dislike, because "rights" do not exist. **Only one variable: In other words, Graybill's law is recursive. It not only narrows skills and resources down to one skill and one resource, it eliminates all laws except Graybill and all variables except globalism, which is a unary variable. Globalism has only one value, T. Any country or person or organization that attempts to set Globalism to F immediately ceases to exist.
Labels: Asked and answered
¶ 2:04 AM
