Good old symmetrical scapegoating
At some point in late 2016 it looked like the tradition of Symmetrical Scapegoating had disappeared, because the two "sides" in politics were actually seeking DIFFERENT goals for the first time in many decades.

Good old SS is back.

On one "side" we have an idiot Hollywood satan staging a realistic assassination and then blaming Trump when people ON HER OWN "SIDE" find assassination distasteful enough to fire her.

On the other "side", we have Repooflicans blaming Obama for Trump's FAILURE to do his job.

Headline: BREAKING: Obama Holdovers Sabotaged Trump’s Plans

Well, why were those holdovers still there? You supposedly represent a change of leadership, and therefore your JOB, BY FUCKING TAUTOLOGICAL DEFINITION, is to REPLACE the old leadership with new leadership. You made a constant point of saying "You're fired." Now you're blaming the old monsters because YOU didn't fire them.

Perfect symmetry. Griffin is fired by people on her own side and blames Trump. Trump FAILS to fire people on Griffin's side, and blames people on Griffin's side for his failure to fire them.

Meanwhile, outside of the symmetry but even crazier, Hillary blames RUSSIANWIKILEAKS and RUSSIANMEDDLING for the results of HILLARYMEDDLING. The Clintons ACTUALLY meddled and hacked the DNC, preventing DNC from picking Bernie who could have defeated Trump easily.

Means, motive, opportunity. In an all-hacked world, everyone has the means, so that's a null question. Russia's MOTIVE doesn't fit. Russian media clearly and openly wanted to see Bernie win. They didn't trust Trump, and they were right. Why would Russia corrupt the primaries to defeat Bernie? Only the Clinton Mafia had the MOTIVE to defeat Bernie, and only the Clinton Mafia was already in the middle of DNC with the OPPORTUNITY to cheat Bernie.
  ¶ 3:26 PM