Monday, October 07, 2013
Non-random observation on random

When "scientists" call a process Random, they mean it's indeterminate or incalculable; when "scientists" call a process Ordered, they mean it's determinate or calculable. This is pure nonsense.

Let's arbitrarily focus on one simple calculable measurement, the side-to-side rotation of a car.

In the initial state, which we'll call S-sub-0, the frame is horizontal.

Here's one altered state S-sub-1, with the left side of the frame down.

And now we have a second altered state S-sub-2, with the left side of the frame up.

We would typically treat S1 as the result of random processes, and we would treat S2 as the result of non-random ordering processes.

Let's take a different path.

S1 happened because the left front tire went flat, which resulted from an unsupervised set of natural processes. Molecules of rubber moved into a condition that no longer separated high-pressure interior air from lower-pressure exterior air, and the 'random' Brownian motion of the air caused the two pressures to equalize.

S2 results from a supervised set of natural processes. Polistra noticed that the car wasn't level, diagnosed the problem, gathered appropriate tools, and began to correct the condition.

If you look at either process from a sufficiently microscopic viewpoint, you'd be unable to tell the difference. No matter where you looked, you'd see molecules moving around. Are these movements EVER indeterminate or unpredictable? No. Never. At any single instant, each molecule is pushed by its neighbors using electrostatic forces, and at any instant these (relatively few) neighborly pushes can be calculated nicely by plain old Newtonian laws. We can't possibly calculate the full set of movements over any non-zero time interval, but this is true in both situations. This is a practical limitation, not a distinction between the two types of situation. In theory we could run back and calculate all the influences on one molecule since the creation of the universe, which means its motion is always determinate and predictable. Practically, the task is impossible because it would require a practically infinite number of arithmetic operations.

So there's no such thing as indeterminate. The "scientific" definition of random vs order is simply and obviously nonsensical.

What then is the real difference? The molecules inside Polistra's cells are part of a living organism. Their movements are channeled at every level to achieve the purposes of this living organism. Some of those molecules are helping to power muscles in her arm, some are picking up light waves and passing them on to other molecules that are helping to process the light waves into signals, then on to others that compare the signals with templates resulting from internal memory references... and so on literally ad infinitum.

Is purpose always part of a living organism? Microscopically it's always the same. All organisms from bacteria to vertebrates have similar purposive loops and control mechanisms inside their cells. Microscopically the purpose is always to maintain extreme differentials of temperature, pressure and chemistry between inside and outside, so conditions inside the cell remain conducive to running the purposive loops. At larger scales the purpose is expressed in all sorts of ways. A bacterium sends and receives chemical and electromagnetic signals, and moves toward food; vertebrates send and receive acoustic, visual, chemical, and electromagnetic signals, and move toward all sorts of goals.

Is an extreme differential always 'orderly'? No. A nice example popped up just as I started to write this paragraph. I'm running laundry this morning in my stupid fucking front-loader machine. I heard it start to spin. I trotted to the laundry room so I could be prepared to shut it off early, because the load is usually distributed with an extreme differential, causing the machine to shake itself and the floor to disordered pieces. This morning, unusually, the load happened to be nearly 'random' so I could allow the spin to finish with minimum destruction. [Sidenote: I'll never buy another stupid fucking front-loader. A top-loader can also be unbalanced, but the top-loader allows you to flip the lid and rearrange the contents at any time. It lets you apply human purpose to the load based on human intelligence that remembers the result of an extreme differential.]

Conclusion: When we talk about random vs ordered, we're not talking about any mechanically measurable difference. We're only talking about living purpose. Soul, if you like that word.

Labels:

Name:
Location: Spokane

Polistra was named after the original townsite of Manhattan (the one in Kansas). When I was growing up in Manhattan, I spent a lot of time exploring by foot, bike, and car. I discovered the ruins of an old mill along Wildcat Creek, and decided (inaccurately) that it was the remains of the original site of Polistra. Accurate or not, I've always liked the name, with its echoes of Poland (an under-appreciated friend of freedom) and stars. ==== The title icon is explained here. ==== Switchover: This 2007 entry marks a sharp change in worldview from neocon to pure populist. ===== The long illustrated story of Polistra's Dream is a time-travel fable, attempting to answer the dangerous revision of New Deal history propagated by Amity Shlaes. The Dream has 8 episodes, linked in a chain from the first. This entry explains the Shlaes connection.

My graphics products:

Free stuff at ShareCG

And some leftovers here.

ARCHIVES
March 2005 / April 2005 / May 2005 / June 2005 / July 2005 / August 2005 / September 2005 / October 2005 / November 2005 / December 2005 / January 2006 / February 2006 / March 2006 / April 2006 / May 2006 / June 2006 / July 2006 / August 2006 / September 2006 / October 2006 / November 2006 / December 2006 / January 2007 / February 2007 / March 2007 / April 2007 / May 2007 / June 2007 / July 2007 / August 2007 / September 2007 / October 2007 / November 2007 / December 2007 / January 2008 / February 2008 / March 2008 / April 2008 / May 2008 / June 2008 / July 2008 / August 2008 / September 2008 / October 2008 / November 2008 / December 2008 / January 2009 / February 2009 / March 2009 / April 2009 / May 2009 / June 2009 / July 2009 / August 2009 / September 2009 / October 2009 / November 2009 / December 2009 / January 2010 / February 2010 / March 2010 / April 2010 / May 2010 / June 2010 / July 2010 / August 2010 / September 2010 / October 2010 / November 2010 / December 2010 / January 2011 / February 2011 / March 2011 / April 2011 / May 2011 / June 2011 / July 2011 / August 2011 / September 2011 / October 2011 / November 2011 / December 2011 / January 2012 / February 2012 / March 2012 / April 2012 / May 2012 / June 2012 / July 2012 / August 2012 / September 2012 / October 2012 / November 2012 / December 2012 / January 2013 / February 2013 / March 2013 / April 2013 / May 2013 / June 2013 / July 2013 / August 2013 / September 2013 / October 2013 / November 2013 / December 2013 / January 2014 / February 2014 / March 2014 / April 2014 / May 2014 / June 2014 / July 2014 / August 2014 / September 2014 / October 2014 / November 2014 / December 2014 / January 2015 / February 2015 / March 2015 / April 2015 / May 2015 / June 2015 / July 2015 / August 2015 / September 2015 / October 2015 / November 2015 / December 2015 / January 2016 / February 2016 / March 2016 / April 2016 / May 2016 / June 2016 / July 2016 / August 2016 / September 2016 / October 2016 / November 2016 / December 2016 / January 2017 / February 2017 / March 2017 / April 2017 / May 2017 / June 2017 / July 2017 / August 2017 / September 2017 / October 2017 / November 2017 /

Major tags or subjects:

Aberree
Carbon Cult
Constants and variables
Defensible spaces
Experiential education
Grand Blueprint
Гром победы
Heimatkunde