Sunday, July 31, 2011
Zenith of idiocy
You simply can't get any more stupid and reverse-brained than this.
= = = = =
By this logic, John Brown was inflamed by the strong anti-slavery atmosphere in the South.
No, John Brown was inflamed by slavery.
= = = = =
By this logic, Hitler was inflamed by other Euro leaders criticizing Jews.
No, Hitler was inflamed by Jews.
= = = = =
By this logic, Nelson Mandela was inflamed by P.W. Botha's loud opposition to apartheid.
No, Mandela was inflamed by apartheid.
= = = = =
By this logic, Comrade Martin Luther King Boulevard was inflamed by George Wallace's oft-expressed hatred of segregation.
No, Comrade MLK Boulevard was inflamed by segregation.
= = = = =
By this logic, Anders Breivik was inflamed by Euro leaders criticizing multiculturalism.
No, Breivik was inflamed by multiculturalism.
= = = = =
In each case a radical was offended enough by an ACTUAL FACT to take dramatic action. Opinions about the fact by various political leaders at the time were mainly in favor of the offensive fact, and THAT'S how radicalization typically occurs. When you sense that your leaders are stubbornly ignoring or encouraging something that is immoral by your standards, you're more likely to go beyond speech when attempting to fix the immoral situation.
Sidenote: This sort of connects with the previous entry on non-Euclidean thinking. Nobel idiot Jagland, residing in the dead heart of the Gramscian ruling class bubble, has never allowed historical facts to enter her/and/or/his bizarre alien cranial mechanism, so s/he cannot comprehend a rational radical who responds to plain facts. S/he can only look at the situation in terms of post-modern textual deconstruction. ¶ 7:46 AM
Thorbjørn Jagland says Europe's leaders are 'playing with fire' if they use right-wing rhetoric when discussing multiculturalism.
Europe's leaders, including David Cameron, have been warned to adopt a more "cautious" approach when discussing multiculturalism. The Norwegian chairman of the Nobel peace prize committee has told them they risk inflaming far-right and anti-Muslim sentiment.
= = = = =
By this logic, John Brown was inflamed by the strong anti-slavery atmosphere in the South.
No, John Brown was inflamed by slavery.
= = = = =
By this logic, Hitler was inflamed by other Euro leaders criticizing Jews.
No, Hitler was inflamed by Jews.
= = = = =
By this logic, Nelson Mandela was inflamed by P.W. Botha's loud opposition to apartheid.
No, Mandela was inflamed by apartheid.
= = = = =
By this logic, Comrade Martin Luther King Boulevard was inflamed by George Wallace's oft-expressed hatred of segregation.
No, Comrade MLK Boulevard was inflamed by segregation.
= = = = =
By this logic, Anders Breivik was inflamed by Euro leaders criticizing multiculturalism.
No, Breivik was inflamed by multiculturalism.
= = = = =
In each case a radical was offended enough by an ACTUAL FACT to take dramatic action. Opinions about the fact by various political leaders at the time were mainly in favor of the offensive fact, and THAT'S how radicalization typically occurs. When you sense that your leaders are stubbornly ignoring or encouraging something that is immoral by your standards, you're more likely to go beyond speech when attempting to fix the immoral situation.
Sidenote: This sort of connects with the previous entry on non-Euclidean thinking. Nobel idiot Jagland, residing in the dead heart of the Gramscian ruling class bubble, has never allowed historical facts to enter her/and/or/his bizarre alien cranial mechanism, so s/he cannot comprehend a rational radical who responds to plain facts. S/he can only look at the situation in terms of post-modern textual deconstruction. ¶ 7:46 AM
