Final bell
I'm noticing the rather strange pastor who plans to burn some Korans on 9/11 this year, in an act of defensive desecration.

It's an appropriate symbolic action in a war between religions, and the worldwide response of Arab vermin shows that it's a highly meaningful action.

In a sane country, an action that annoys the enemy in time of war would be celebrated, or more precisely it would be so common that it wouldn't even be newsworthy.

We are no longer a sane country.

I've looked through Google's links to this pastor's actions, and can't find any article that considers it even objectively; all the "news" and comment is wildly opposed to the burning. Silliest of all, perhaps most symptomatic of our terminal mental disorder, is a comment at Prince Walid's News Network by some post-Christian "pastor" who speaks in Teilhardian Marxist lingo:

So, here are seven questions for Pastor Jones:

1. How can his proposed action be other than one of reactive fear, not one of proactive confidence? It is foreign to the Gospel.

2. Is not the burning of the Koran seen by Muslim peoples as bad news, and thus a hindrance to Muslims grasping the Good News in the lives of Christians?

3. Is not the burning of the Koran an act of accusation and condemnation? The name of Satan in the Hebrew (ha’satan) means “the accuser” or “the slanderer.”

4. Does not the burning of the Koran thus burn Muslims in their very souls?

5. Does not the burning of the Koran by professing Christians thus slander the name of Jesus Christ?

6. What happens if people are killed, injured or persecuted as a result, if properties are burned or damaged, due to an inflamed Muslim world as images of a burning Koran flood the Internet? Who will be ultimately responsible?

7. Jesus, in the face of his enemies during Passover Week, embraced their toughest questions in public assembly. Is not the burning of the Koran the opposite of such confidence in communication?

For Christians who embrace the proactive confidence of the Gospel, we seek out the toughest questions from Muslims in public assembly, among equals in the sight of the one true Creator, where the Bible and the Koran can be looked at side by side.

Well, I have no idea what this "proactive confidence" shit is (though I probably could have used it when I was younger!) but anyway I'll answer the questions you posed.

= = = = =

Q1. How can his proposed action be other than one of reactive fear, not one of proactive confidence? It is foreign to the Gospel.

A1. Reactive fear is appropriate when dealing with a primitive enemy who is trying his damndest to kill us.

Q2. Is not the burning of the Koran seen by Muslim peoples as bad news, and thus a hindrance to Muslims grasping the Good News in the lives of Christians?

A2. Yes, it is seen by Arab vermin as bad news. It is seen as a news item informing the Arab vermin that one small congregation in America has not yet surrendered, that America is only 99.999969% conquered. And I don't give a flying fuck, nor a running fuck, nor a walking fuck, nor a sitting-down fuck, about the "hindrance" to Mohammedans grasping the Good News. The survivors may grasp civilization after enough of them are dead, just as the Krauts and Japs did after 1945.

Q3. Is not the burning of the Koran an act of accusation and condemnation? The name of Satan in the Hebrew (ha’satan) means “the accuser” or “the slanderer.”

A3. Yes, it is condemnation, you self-stupefied retard. In case you didn't notice, big tall buildings in big city fall down go boom 9 years ago. Big tall buildings didn't just collapse from mechanical failure, they were attacked by Arab vermin. Such an act deserves condemnation to say the least.

Q4. Does not the burning of the Koran thus burn Muslims in their very souls?

A4. Yes. That's the point, and they clearly recognize the point.

Q5. Does not the burning of the Koran by professing Christians thus slander the name of Jesus Christ?

A5. No, it supports Jesus. Arab vermin are killing Christians all over the world. They are "slandering the name of Jesus", if that phrase has any meaning.

Q6. What happens if people are killed, injured or persecuted as a result, if properties are burned or damaged, due to an inflamed Muslim world as images of a burning Koran flood the Internet? Who will be ultimately responsible?

A6. The Arab vermin will be responsible. You obviously know nothing about human nature or morality, do you?

Q7. Jesus, in the face of his enemies during Passover Week, embraced their toughest questions in public assembly. Is not the burning of the Koran the opposite of such confidence in communication?

A7. When the other side has declared ACTUAL WAR against your side, "confidence" must take a harder and more concrete form than merely being ready to talk. Diplomacy is designed to avoid war, and we've long since blown that chance if there ever was one. It's time for something beyond jibber-jabber.
  ¶ 4:47 AM