Sunday, July 16, 2006
Must read
And speaking of Jed Babbin, his latest Spectator piece is decisive, definitive, and dispositive.
Babbin has written a credo for winning this war, a credo that the Second Ford Administration totally fails to understand.
... history from Carthage to Vietnam teaches that if we fail to prosecute a war in a manner calculated to win it decisively, we will lose it inevitably.
We believe that terrorism cannot threaten us significantly without the support of nations, and that those nations that are preeminent in their support for terrorists -- Iran and Syria -- must be forcibly disconnected from terrorism.
We believe that waiting for Islam to reform itself is tantamount to accepting defeat and that radical Islam (an ideology, not a religion) must be defeated just as Soviet Communism and German Nazism were.
We believe that our military's job is not to build nations but to defeat those that threaten America. Once they have done so, their job is finished and whatever the people of a nation do thereafter is their business, not ours, unless they choose to threaten America or its allies again.
We assert that requiring democracy in Iraq before defeating the Syrian and Iranian regime enables the enemy to control the pace and direction of the war.
And we believe that peace isn't about "processes." It's about winners and losers. Until you have each belligerent in one category or the other, the war isn't over.
-----
Please, o gods of politics and power, if you exist, we need to replace our Chamberlain with a Churchill. NOW. TODAY. Not 2008.
Who is our Churchill? Ideally, Babbin himself. Within the realms of practical politics, Peter King seems like the closest candidate. ¶ 10:57 PM
Babbin has written a credo for winning this war, a credo that the Second Ford Administration totally fails to understand.
... history from Carthage to Vietnam teaches that if we fail to prosecute a war in a manner calculated to win it decisively, we will lose it inevitably.
We believe that terrorism cannot threaten us significantly without the support of nations, and that those nations that are preeminent in their support for terrorists -- Iran and Syria -- must be forcibly disconnected from terrorism.
We believe that waiting for Islam to reform itself is tantamount to accepting defeat and that radical Islam (an ideology, not a religion) must be defeated just as Soviet Communism and German Nazism were.
We believe that our military's job is not to build nations but to defeat those that threaten America. Once they have done so, their job is finished and whatever the people of a nation do thereafter is their business, not ours, unless they choose to threaten America or its allies again.
We assert that requiring democracy in Iraq before defeating the Syrian and Iranian regime enables the enemy to control the pace and direction of the war.
And we believe that peace isn't about "processes." It's about winners and losers. Until you have each belligerent in one category or the other, the war isn't over.
-----
Please, o gods of politics and power, if you exist, we need to replace our Chamberlain with a Churchill. NOW. TODAY. Not 2008.
Who is our Churchill? Ideally, Babbin himself. Within the realms of practical politics, Peter King seems like the closest candidate. ¶ 10:57 PM
