1. It is impossible for most people to find time to study everything that is important for some men to master. 2. The subjects discarded, in whole or in part, by each separate class of students, should be those that will be of least importance to them. 3. Of those retained, prominence should be given to each in proportion to the actual benefit expected to be derived from it in the state of Kansas. 4. The farmer and mechanic should be as completely educated as the lawyer and minister; but the information that is essential to the one class is often comparatively useless to the other; and it is therefore unjust to compel all classes to pursue the same course of study. 5. Ninety-seven percent of the people of Kansas are in the various industrial vocations, and only three per cent in the learned professions; yet prominence is given to the studies that are most useful to the professions instead of those that are most useful to the industrial pursuits. This state of things should be reversed, and the greatest prominence given to the subjects that are the most certain to fit the great majority for the work they should and will pursue. 6. Most young men and young women are unable to go through a full college degree. Therefore, each year's course of study should, as far as practicable, be complete in itself. 7. The natural effect of exclusive headwork, as contradistinguished from handwork, is to beget a dislike for the latter. 8. The only way to counteract this tendency is to educate the head and the hand at the same time, so that when a young man leaves college he will be prepared to earn his living in a vocation in which he has fitted himself to excel. 9. Putting off the choice of an occupation until after the student leaves college as a graduate, instead of making it when he enters college, or as soon thereafter as possible, is a mistake. 10. Some agricultural colleges take as an objective point the graduation of agricultural experts, experimenters, professors of sciences, editors, etc; the Kansas State Agricultural College should take as an objective point the graduation of capable farmers and housewives, and it should make an effort to graduate thousands of such. 12. Whatever else may yet need to be tried, there is no use in repeating the experiment of flying a literary kite with an agricultural tail, so often made in various quarters. It is a pleasant regential and professorial amusement, and quite attractive to an immediate locality; but there is nothing in it for the industrial student, whose estate pays for the kite. The fact that, out of some 600 students attending Cornell University last year, only two were studying agriculture, is enough for us.Anderson turned the school in the proper direction, though not ideally or completely. It continued to provide real education until the 1950s, when social pressure from accreditors and other colleges overwhelmed rationality, and it returned to the useless Theorize & Memorize model. The Grange connection helps me to solve the question I asked last week: Why do conservatives love T & M, which belongs solidly and consistently to Lenin and Satan? Why do conservatives hate Manual Training, which belongs solidly and consistently to traditional morality and traditional thinking? Perhaps because Manual Training became associated with the Grange and Populists, who are (falsely) considered to be left-wing. Feels like an inadequate answer, but might be one piece of a larger connection. = = = = = ** Footnote: I emphasize anti-southern-slavery because the Kansas expedition was financed by textile factory owners who wanted to see the West adopt their profitable form of northern industrial slavery, not southern agricultural slavery. In the end Bloodthirsty Madman Lincoln gave them what they wanted (along with 600,000 completely unnecessary deaths), but it didn't work out to their benefit. They forgot, as Yankee dickheads always do, that humans are not identical. Westerners moved west specifically because they were too ornery and loose to geehaw with either form of slavery. = = = = = END REPRINT. In rereading the item I was struck by the modern connection, more obvious and urgent now than in 2013. Goodnow was the EXACT equivalent of today's Tech Tyrants. Zuckerberg, Musk, Bezos. Goodnow was a religious fanatic. Vegan, no spices, no salt, no sex. IPO and crowdsourcing. Start a company, turn it into a government agency. Nominally pacifist but explicitly and KNOWINGLY helping to start a war that would burn 1/4 of the country. Knowingly serving NYC corporate interests while pretending to be a radical. Anderson was the opposite. His lifestyle was ordinary, but his thoughts were truly radical, and he managed to develop his thoughts into a radical institution. It didn't stay fully radical, but the influence lasted several decades. The original KSHS article is recommended reading for today's true radicals.
The current icon shows Polistra using a Personal Equation Machine.