What were the riots for?
The summer riots deserve more attention. I don't have any special info or clear thoughts, just trying to pull the subject back into the open and ask some stupid questions.

Riots are ALWAYS government projects. Anyone can start a small demonstration, but a protest that grows and turns into a riot is ALWAYS sponsored by government.

The sponsorship of these riots was upfront and out in the open. Mayors and governors LED the riots. Can't get more obvious.

Corporations joined in unison, issuing OFFICIAL statements that riots are good for "democracy". Kaiser Permanente issued an OFFICIAL MEDICAL PRESCRIPTION that riots are a necessary part of public "health".

Some of the corporations backed away after learning that BLM leaders were pro-Palestine, but they never disowned their OFFICIAL INCITEMENT TO VIOLENCE.

Can you yell RIOT in a crowded theater? Yes, if you're a Correct Person. In fact you are required to yell RIOT in a crowded theater. Yelling STOP RIOTING is illegal now.

Part of this is normal Deepstate procedure, but where's the connection to the "virus" holocaust?

Media have been telling us for a long time that riots are necessary and good when the riots agree with Deepstate. It was already blazingly clear in the 1992 LA riots.

Was the public "health" connection just a fashionable way to tie the same old statement into today's genocide? Or was it intentional and meaningful?

Open leadership by mayors is new. Previous riot seasons like 1968 and 1992 were not openly led by mayors or governors. Quiet leadership is not new. Political leaders have often been closely tied with gangs, using the approved gang as a private army to blackmail or bomb unwanted citizens and merchants.

And going back even farther, aristocrats led their armies into battle in medieval times.



Now that 1000 has come around on the calendar again, this isn't really surprising.

Labels: 2000=1000

  ¶ 8:38 AM