Exception?
Is this a unique exception to the rule that the Supremes always give NYC what it wants?

On the surface it appears that the Supremes have told Cuomo to stop making harsher "virus" restrictions against churches, when many other businesses have less stringent rules.

They haven't told any demons to stop the lockdowns and muzzles, and haven't told any demons to stop limiting household gatherings. They blindly and satanically obey the holocaust premises established by the Public Death Officers.

This is like the German Supreme Court in 1941 ordering the SS to load the cattle cars more carefully. The court agrees automatically (OF COURSE! NEEDLESS TO SAY!) that all Untermenschen must be exterminated, but careless loading spills Judenblut on the tracks where Aryan workers might step in it and lose their purity. If you think I'm exaggerating, read the comments in this thread. Pure Nazi.

I'm sure the workaround is builtin. A lawyer will undoubtedly see the flashing neon loophole that explicitly shows Cuomo how to ignore the "decision". Cuomo will ignore it anyway, so it doesn't matter. His easiest option is just to raise all restrictions to the same level as the church restrictions.

The most interesting thing in the Federalist article is this peculiar CSS artifact, which I've never seen before:



The underlying code has a separate CSS div for the weird paragraph, probably a last-minute addition. Presumably the separate CSS somehow messes up the proportion math for the rest of the article. I've done a lot of CSS stuff in building courseware; often an Iframe or Table alters proportions, but I've never seen characters cut in half like this. Usually the browser just adds a scrollbar when a section is wider than the rest.
  ¶ 7:34 AM