Random stories
Halfway following on previous item about candidate selection.

Deepstate runs different brands just as GM and Budweiser run different brands, widening the appeal. If you're too snobbish to buy a Chevy Citation, you'll buy it when it's branded as a Cadillac Cimarron.

Just for fun, let's try to sort out the brands within Deepstate for recent candidates. The pattern is perfectly clear after 1980. Before 1980 I'm wildly guessing, probably wrong.

Start with Nixon. He made some mistakes in his early career, then after Cohn's takeover of the media and Congress in 1954, Nixon decided to ride with the winner. Cohn was the head of the NYC mafia, and Nixon became his main hitman.

Nixon began to take power in '56 after Ike was heartattacked. Castro, initially sponsored by CIA, went rogue and started working for Cuba after winning the revolution. Castro was kicking out the casinos run by the NYC mafia. Nixon worked with CIA to create various countercoups.

JFK is harder to guess. The Kennedy family ran the Irish branch of the mafia, so JFK vs Nixon looked like Irish vs Jewish mafia. Some stories say that JFK rebelled against his masters and got killed. He clearly didn't like the CIA branch of Deepstate, but real rebellion is harder to find. He allowed Nixon's countercoup to proceed. Maybe he sabotaged it, but more likely the countercoup was just a dumb idea. Castro was serving the Cuban people, so the Color Revolution couldn't succeed.

LBJ was unquestionably CIA. He killed JFK, for reasons still unclear, then went ahead and did everything CIA wanted.

Nixon in '68 was simply LBJ's heir. LBJ wanted Nixon to win, so Nixon won. Humphrey was a slot-filler to make the "election" worth the trouble for the media.

From '68 to '73 Nixon served Deepstate perfectly, especially the NYC Jewish brand. It's still not clear why he was removed. He didn't fail or rebel. Maybe Deepstate just didn't trust him to continue serving loyally? Maybe he had plans to rebel?

McGovern was a slot-filler, giving the leftist activist brand of Deepstate something to "vote" "for".

In '74 Deepstate reasserted full control of Congress and the media, and began the long series of fake emergencies with the "global warming" panic.

Carter and Ford are oddballs. Both look like slot-fillers, expected to lose. Carter followed CIA orders, ruining both agriculture and petroleum sectors of the economy "because" "Afghanistan". He went on to serve CIA as an "independent" "diplomat" after the end of his term, but he never seemed to enjoy it. Best guess: Carter was basically a sane man, driven by blackmail, not by natural psychopathic inclination.

After 1980 there's no veil of secrecy. Sucker Filter all the way. Bush Senior was openly and proudly CIA. Following LBJ's model, he assassinated Reagan to prevent possible disloyalty. His shot was good, but the assassination failed because the nearest hospital had tremendous experience with gunshots. Why did they have experience? Because of the drug wars created by Deepstate. Nice bit of Emerson justice, but it didn't really matter. Reagan was weak after the shooting, and Bush Senior assumed the presidency. He crashed Russia to cover Soros's shorts, and advanced the "global warming" panic well beyond Nixon's efforts.

Dukakis? Another slot-filler.

The brand competition gets interesing in 1992. Clinton represented the up-and-coming Epstein brand, closely tied to the new tech industry and Mossad. Bush Senior continued with CIA. Sort of like Saturn replacing Oldsmobile.

Dole? etc.

CIA returned in 2000 with Bush Junior. Gore carried on the Epstein/tech brand. A literal coin-toss gave the "win" to Bush Junior. He focused again on Afghanistan and Russia.

Kerry? etc.

2008 marked the resurgence of the banking brand of Deepstate, which had been out of the public eye since 1946. Obama represented Epstein/tech, PLUS the bankers.

2012: Both markers were working mainly for the bank brand. Romney was pure bank, Obama was bank plus Epstein. Epstein won, unsurprisingly.

2016 was interesting in the same way as 1992. Trump brought the NYC Cohn brand back into the picture, for the first time since Nixon's removal. The NYC Cohn brand "won", but only as a Pied Piper creating useful backwash for the Epstein brand.

Labels: Asked and badly answered, Parkinson, Sucker Filter

  ¶ 7:31 AM