The question for this inquiry committee is, of course, also: what can we expect, what is the best-case scenario?

In my view, that all citizens, at least all medical colleagues – after all, they should all feel committed to the Hippocratic way of thinking, the slogan "nihil nocere", i.e. not to do any harm – and that everyone informs themselves also beyond all those media in line with government policies, asks critical questions and does plausibility checks. And then it will become clear that Bergamo is not Italy, Ischgl is not Austria, New York is not the USA, and a carnival party in Heinsberg, an apartment building in Göttingen and slaughterhouses, wherever they may be, are not Germany.

It should also become visible for all,

- that the German health care system has never even been close to running the risk of decompensating, i.e. being overburdened;

- that measurement figures, such as the doubling rate and this dreadful number “R0”, had the primary purpose of creating fear and putting pressure on the population, and were communicated in an unobjective and manipulative way for lack of reference to the number of tests carried out;

- that false and untrustworthy fatality figures have been misused for intimidation purposes;

- that the number of cases was already significantly declining well before the lockdown;

- that a general mask-wearing obligation ordered 4 weeks later, I repeat 4 weeks later, was factually unfounded, unlawful and psycho-socially irresponsible;

- that the incorrigible sticking to measures and already refuted statements, i.e. against better knowledge and proven evidence, is a criminal offence in this context;

and

- that ultimately a drastic change in the party-political decision-making structures is overdue because this is the only way to reliably prevent this anti-democratic approach from being continued or repeated.

Labels: Jackboot stomping forever

¶ 4:17 AM