Excellent point about paper vs digital
One of Berenson's commenters wonders what historians will think.

Historians will be scratching their heads at this time period. I was thinking today, how much info will be lost bc of the digitization of docs & less physical docs available for historians to dig through? It would be much easier for agencies to "shred" digital docs then paper.

Well, "historians" are extinct, so it's a null question. But if we speculate that the proverbial Martian historians will someday examine how Earth committed suicide, digital vs paper would be a huge part of the story.

In money (especially if we switch to Bitcoin) digital makes it possible for Deepstate to change all numbers at once.

In "journalism" and "history", digital makes it possible for Twitter and Facebook and Google to discard all Crimethink with one keystroke.

In measurement, digital eliminates our sense of proportion and context. Everything is stored and displayed as pure numbers. Loss of proportion is a CRUCIALLY IMPORTANT INGREDIENT of the current panication.

Digitization of medical records was the second step after the HIPPA shit. The HIPPA shit made your own records unavailable to you, made it difficult for a hospital to get your records from your regular MD, and made overall transparency impossible. The latter effect has been deadly in the current panication. Digitizing, required by Romneycare, eliminated the MODULAR records formerly kept by each hospital and clinic. All records are now under central control, only visible with Deepstate's permission. There's no way for independent analysts to gather and process raw data, no way to see the CONTEXT of other diseases for a SENSE OF PROPORTION. We only see what Deepstate wants us to see.

= = = = =

Another part of the digital trend is loss of the time dimension. Using stats instead of time-graphs is a big part of the "carbon" fraud. When you're accustomed to time graphs, you can see that CO2 is not the leading variable. Stats intentionally hide all phase relationships. This is showing up again in the Flu fraud. Life and death are the ultimate time graph. Flu, both generic and Branded, kills people who are expected to die this year or next year. The Branded flu is killing people who would ordinarily have died of the generic flu. When you concentrate solely on IMMEDIATE stats, and skip the context of expected death time, you can convince people that the Branded Flu is a unique unprecedented threat that we've never encountered before, requiring unprecedented solutions like killing everyone. The same INSTANTANEOUS stat prevents us from seeing the patterns of immunity. When you retain normal civilization, a few more people are likely to die earlier. When you slow the spread of the virus, those early deaths are postponed, not eliminated. Those people were scheduled to die this year or next year, and they will still die this year or next year.

= = = = =

Reminding myself: The BIG question is how and why the Chinese lockdown, developed to wipe out a Christian church, spread to every country except Sweden and Belarus. Why did all of those leaders, even Putin and AMLO, instantly commit total war against their own people? The richer countries were fully prepared for epidemics, with public health systems ready to handle surges. We'd been handling surges OF THE SAME SIZE for many decades, without drama or publicity. We started handling this epidemic normally. Shortly thereafter, SOMETHING OR SOMEBODY intervened, persuading all governments to commit a holocaust against their own people.

What was the SOMETHING OR SOMEBODY? How did it persuade Putin and AMLO? Trump and most Euros didn't need any persuading. Trump and most Euros had been slaughtering Deplorables en masse since 2008, and were ecstatic when a more efficient Final Solution became available.

Labels: Asked and unanswered, Jackboot stomping forever

  ¶ 6:11 AM