Agrees with experience /// EDIT: Well, maybe.
Irons interviews Gerrard Williams, a Brit historian. Williams tells us how Hitler escaped to Argentina, and how the Nazi government was transferred to US.

I trust people based on my experience. When an "expert" says one thing that I know to be wrong, I stop listening. Williams agrees with my experience and knowledge in several ways, and doesn't say anything that I know to be false.

1. Our reporters during WW2 were strictly objective. It's hard to believe now, but thanks to the OTR preservers, we have lots of recordings. Our newsreaders strictly distinguished between fact, propaganda (including ours) and opinion.

2. In the '60s, Americans knew that Wernher von Braun was a Nazi. It was common knowledge that we picked up the Kraut missile program and rebranded it. Williams fills in the details of the pickup.

3. Something switched abruptly in 1946. I've been discussing this from the viewpoint of electronics, and from puzzlement about Stalin's resentment. In '45 we had an open-source attitude toward Russia, and appreciated Russia's sacrifice. Abruptly in '46 we took the Kraut side, treating Russians as Untermenschen who needed to be exterminated.

4. Since 1950, and especially since 1990, we have been explicitly imitating Germany's approach and actions. We are actively supporting and implementing the blood fetish of Soros, who is the last pedigreed actual Nazi. Soros has matched his role model's genocide record, and continues to exceed it.

Given these wide areas of agreement, and no definite disagreement, I'm inclined to believe Williams's story that Adolf escaped to Argentina and died in 1962.

The cheerful teamwork of Bormann and Dulles and McCloy is chilling, but again not terribly surprising.

= = = = =

Later after a second listen: Williams departs from reality on modern trends, if not on older stuff. He says that the people who are corrupting politics with money now are "all right-wing". He mentions Koch, but not Soros or Steyer or Bezos or Bloomberg. By strict economic definition all of those globalist monsters are "right" instead of "left". They all believe in TOTAL MONOPOLY for Koch and Soros and Steyer and Bezos and Bloomberg respectively, and they all believe in ZERO TAX for Koch and Soros and Steyer and Bezos and Bloomberg respectively. But I'm pretty damn sure Williams is not using the strict economic definition for "right-wing". He just means "associated with Deplorables". This matches my recent observation that ALL BRITS, whether right or left or "independent", MUST SAY THE SAME WORDS.
  ¶ 7:25 AM