Monstrous pile
Listening to the Robust Debate in Parliament on the question of whether Parliament should be allowed to have a Robust Debate about starting wars.
As always with Robust Debates, there is no debate because there is only one side. A Robust Debate is an auction. All participants are bidding up the budget and strength of evil.
Nobody is asking the simple basic question about this specific war.
How does it
serve British interests to attack Syria, which never attacked Britain? What do we
gain from bombing a country that wasn't even bothering us?
Syria's allies are also innocent in terms of major conflicts. Russia never attacked Britain. Persia never attacked Britain. Turkey and Britain have been on opposite sides in most wars, but there was only one direct conflict, in which Britain was the aggressor.
What did ANYONE hope to gain from starting this war? There was never a goal except raw evil and crime and chaos. Israel wanted to destabilize Assad because Israel loves chaos just as much as we do. So we obeyed Bibi and committed mass murder to please him.
It's a monstrous pile of psychopathic genocidists, shouting the names of countries and working together to obliterate the named target. Satan's auction.