Missing most of the point
ZH features the latest feminist fad, "affirmative consent". The author and commenters miss the point. Post-1968 feminism is ferociously anti-male in its RHETORIC, but the actual EFFECT is about class and status, not gender. This was already clear in 1978 with sexual harassment "laws", and affirmative consent continues along the same path.
Raw nature defines status by raw physical attractiveness. Civilization tried to level the playing field, providing alternate paths to status. Men could gain status by working and producing, women could gain status by good parenting and nest-making. Feminism explicitly deletes both of those leveling mechanisms, deleting civilization and allowing raw nature to roar back in.
High-status males understand feminism. They know that "harassment" doesn't exist and "affirmative consent" isn't needed when you have what it takes.