Saturday, December 10, 2016
Two facts
Established Fact 1: CIA created both alQaeda and ISIS, and continues to run both.
Established Fact 2: CIA says Russia "interfered" with the 2016 election to push it away from the status quo. (For clarity, the saying is established. The truth of the saying is highly dubious, given that all of CIA's statements have been lies for at least 50 years.)
Assuming for the argument that CIA's lie is true for the first time in history:
Which form of "interference" is worse? An "interference" that could possibly lead to more jobs and less war, or an "interference" that has already killed a million Syrians, Iraqis, Spaniards, Frenchmen, Brits, Krauts, and Americans?
I'd choose the "interference" that showed some signs of causing more jobs and less war, and reject the "interference" that has already killed a million people. The positive-looking interference is probably a trick, but at least it's a trick with some demonstrably positive outputs at this point.
= = = = =
Later thought: Until now, CIA has always served the current administration. Now CIA has openly declared that it sees the new administration as a foreign agent. By extension, CIA has declared that it sees Deplorables as foreign agents and spies who need to be EXTERMINATED. This is nothing new in terms of internal attitude, but CIA has never gone public with its default treason before.
CIA has just declared itself to be an enemy of America. After 50 years of factual treason and omnicidal destruction of civilization, it has finally confessed in public. Trump can't tweet this away. This is a You Go Or I Go moment.
¶ 1:11 AM 
