Tautology
In the idiotic maelstrom about migrants in EU, both sides are missing a basic point about human nature.
Must admit I'm
DELIRIOUSLY HAPPY to see the commie hypersatans reaping EXACTLY what they have been sowing. Invite rapists, get raped. Infinitely well deserved.
Toldja so. Toldja so. Toldja so. Toldja so. Toldja so. Toldja so. Toldja so.
Nevertheless, the non-satanic side is reaching an unfair conclusion about Arabs and Muslims in general. So I reluctantly offer this fact:
Migrants are
not the same people as stayers. In any mass migration, whether it's the Dust Bowl** or the Irish potato famine or the Syrian war, some people choose to stay and some choose to migrate.
Young restless people, often misfits in the land of origin, choose to migrate. Inactive older people, high-status people, and naturally domestic people choose to stay.
You can't hide this fact. No matter how hard the establishment and commies try to softpedal the difference, it's still there. Human nature.
People who engage in criminal activity and do stupid and dangerous things are migrants.
Therefore, migrants are people who engage in criminal activity and do stupid and dangerous things.
No human behavior is 100%, but this is as close to a tautology as you can get.
= = = = =
**Footnote: The Okies in California provide a complete parallel to the current mess. They were the restless and unsuccessful ones, not the domestic settled types. Californians formed a bias against all Oklahomans based on observation of that group, just as some non-Satans are currently biased against all Arabs. Steinbeck tried to Dreamerize them, just as Merkel, Obama, Cameron, et al are Dreamerizing the current migrants. The Calif bias was correct
about the migrants but not about all Okies. The Steinbeck version was simply incorrect.