Point of consistency
The last few major crimes by the Supreme Satans are frustratingly inconsistent from my secular natural-law position.

1. Romneycare can proceed. This is a proper decision in strictly technical terms. Congress passed Romneycare, so the "court" can't interfere. In practical terms this is bad because Romneycare is bad. Obama had the chance to do Medicare For All, but instead he gave this total monopoly to insurors.

2. "Marriage": Illegal and improper on every imaginable level plus all levels not yet imagined. Infinite tyranny. End of civilization. Absolute prohibition of Christianity and Islam.

3. EPA has to go through more hoops before enforcing mercury limits. Technically correct but practically bad. Limits on mercury are EXACTLY the sort of rules EPA should be making, instead of killing millions and wasting trillions with the Gaian sacraments. This is a good and appropriate law against ACTUAL POLLUTION, and it should have been allowed to proceed.

4. Using an effective drug for death penalty is OK. This is a purely good decision, and it's already removed the roadblocks to several punishments.

From my FDR-ish viewpoint, 1 and 3 are conflicted and frustrating, 2 is raw bloody evil, and 4 is good.

Objectively, 1,2,3 are consistent in showing abject obedience to the Corporate Masters. This is most likely the real point of consistency. Supreme Satans always serve Goldman. 4 doesn't seem to affect Corporate Masters either way, so common sense mistakenly leaked through.

But all of these crimes are direct punches in the face to 'standard' Catholics. You can see this on the front page of National Catholic Register. 1 makes things hard for Catholic hospitals; 2 is correctly seen as pure evil; 3 is bad because EPA is perfectly holy and angelic to Antipope Francine; and 4 is bad because Catholics like criminals, I guess. I can't begin to figure out why Romans oppose capital punishment. It ruins their credibility on all other issues.
  ¶ 12:47 PM