Jeremy Browne, a Liberal Democrat, said there needs to be a national debate about whether the state should step in to protect young women from having the veil “imposed” on them. But there is genuine debate about whether girls should feel a compulsion to wear a veil when society deems children to be unable to express personal choices about other areas like buying alcohol, smoking or getting married.Putting it simply: Freedom Of Choice means forcing girls to wear our style of clothing instead of the style required by their own religion. Hmm. Couldn't be that crazy. Let's try another phrasing. Freedom Of Choice means a forced choice: Obey our laws and lose your salvation, or obey your religion and go to jail. No need to try again. It's unsalvageable. There's nothing wrong with having a dress code in schools, or even a dress code in society. Every culture has its dress standards, but in Western countries the dress code was formerly left to societal pressure, not enforced by law. There's nothing wrong with having an honestly described one-religion country. In fact a one-religion one-culture country works, while pluralism has demonstrably and lethally failed everywhere it was tried. But there's EVERYTHING wrong with forcing some religions to conform to your standards and calling this force "Freedom Of Choice."
The current icon shows Polistra using a Personal Equation Machine.