Science is mass murder.
Or to be more exact, everything that appears in public as "science" is mass murder.

Real value-neutral science still goes on, mainly in microbiology, agriculture and engineering. But it never shows up in public discussions, and it never gets the label of "science".

Here's the operational definition:

Every time you hear a politician or public figure distinguishing between two policies on the basis of "science", you can be 100% confident that the "scientific" side requires killing lots of people.

Abortion is the most blatant example. Mass murderers always claim the mantle of "science" when declaring that life begins sometime after birth, and brutally smash anyone who tries to assert the ACTUAL SCIENTIFIC FACTS. Or look at the recent decision by Korman, a black-robed Federal Satan, to require the use of abortifacient drugs. The abortion industry cheered Satan's decision, declaring that "science" had triumphed over politics.

Embryonic stem cells: a more subtle case. The "scientists" insisted that only the embryonic version could work, and went on strike when Bush made it slightly more expensive to work on embryonic cells. (And that's all he did.) ACTUAL SCIENCE had already shown that adult (self-derived) stem cells were more productive than the embryonic type, but that didn't matter to the "scientists" in America. Their sole purpose is to kill babies, not to cure disease. If they couldn't be subsidized and rewarded for killing babies, they weren't going to do "science" at all. Meanwhile, ACTUAL SCIENTISTS in other countries continue to find new and wonderful ways to use adult stem cells.

The metaphoric use of evolution is a parallel vector. Leaving aside the strict details of DNA, the common word evolution should mean a culture or attitude that helps to preserve your own species or subspecies. That's the whole point of natural selection as Darwin saw it. In recent years the metaphor has turned backwards. When you evolve toward accepting homosexual "marriage", you are killing your own species. When you evolve to soften punishment of criminals, or to insert grizzly bears and wolves into cities and farms, you are killing innocent humans. When you evolve to favor Die-Versity laws, you are killing your own ethnic subspecies.

The "global warming" crime. Those who want to starve and freeze the poor to enrich the super-rich always call their side "science", while those who like facts and want to see better conditions for all humanity are called "deniers".

= = = = =

Fresh example today, from good old reliable New Stalinist:

At present, global health investment is voluntary and few countries make sizeable donations. Since the start of the global financial crisis, investment has stagnated. Is there a way to improve the situation? We think so. Although the world does not have a lot of experience in managing global commons, there is an example we can learn from: carbon trading.

Thanks for making my point, Satan. Kill the poor in rich countries to enrich the rich dictators of poor countries.

Battling climate change is also a public good that is vulnerable to free riding. In this case, however, the world has devised a system to try to prevent free riders: carbon credit markets. These are designed to reduce carbon emissions by channelling money to the places where emissions cuts are easiest.

Unfortunately for your argument, and fortunately for civilization, those markets are failing. The parasite has killed the host.

Likewise, it is much cheaper to save a life in a poor country than it is in a rich country. And so at the National University of Singapore we have designed a prototype cap-and-trade system for global health that similarly gives incentives to high- and middle-income countries to save lives cheaply. For such a market to work, we need something to be traded. An obvious candidate is DALYs, or disability-adjusted life years.

This is clearly a Modest Proposal meant to sound outrageous to normal humans while it stirs the bloodthirsty Satans of "science" into mindless follow-the-leader activism. After the activism gets running, the concept will no longer be outrageous. It will be required thought. Anyone who dares to question it will be an unemployable Denialist Fascist Racist Nazi Halliburton. I figure this evolution or personal journey will take about one year in the streamlined turbocharged Suicide Machine that runs western "countries".
  ¶ 3:10 AM