Where does this come from?
There's a deeply stupid assumption underlying articles like these, all taken from today's
Science Daily. (Not picking on Science Daily; it's just that the common thread shows up in one place this morning.)
Crayfish Species Proves to Be the Ultimate SurvivorGiant Moa Had Climate Change Figured outExtinction Risk Factors for New Zealand Birds Today Differ from Those of the PastThe common stupid-factor is a complete inability to account for
adaptation. This often connects with the other stupid-factor:
Global Warming Is Real And Satanic; but the failure to understand flexibility is deeper and longer-lasting.
"Scientists" can't figure out how birds will adapt to a supposed 2-degree increase in global average temperature. First, of course, there's no such thing as a global average; the bird's own local world may well be getting cooler or staying the same. Second and more important, birds somehow manage to adapt to a constant 40-degree daily variation and a 40-degree seasonal variation.
Right here in my yard, the
California Quail are feeding every day, "ultimate survivors" in a total annual range from -20F to 100F. The quail already tolerate a
ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY DEGREE RANGE. And you idiots think they won't tolerate TWO FUCKING DEGREES?