Well, no
Seeing
today's pix of George Zimmerman in the courtroom, it's easy to see why the prosecution and media quickly flooded the air with an older (maybe photoshopped?) picture that made Zimmerman look like the FBI's default suspect. Pudgy, square-faced, pasty. Just like Richard Jewell, like Bruce Ivins, like every other Southern redneck type falsely prosecuted by FBI.
It's also easy to see why Obama jumped in to say that Trayvon could have been his own son.
Exactly not. Judging purely by appearance, Zimmerman
could have been Obama's son, and Trayvon
couldn't. Without any information outside this courtroom picture, most people would think the real Zimmerman is a light-skinned black man, and most people would say he looks like a son of Barack and Michelle.
The media had to eliminate all facts and valid impressions immediately, in order to insure absolute pure raw bloody injustice.
As always.
The only question is why the defense didn't counter this. They presumably knew Zimmerman didn't look like the picture, and they also presumably had the 'smoking gun' picture of his cut and bruised head immediately after the incident. Why did they allow the media and feds to incite riot by flooding the country with the standard vicious visual lies?