Wednesday, August 10, 2011
Final proof
I've been saying over and over since 9/11 that the DC response to 9/11 was completely misplaced, that any damn fool could see which country attacked us. Saudi Arabia attacked us, and the only sane response was to remove Saudi from the map.
Until now, the Saud Dynasty and the Bushobama Dynasty have worked together to conceal this obvious fact, to make it seem that the attack came from Iraq and Afghanistan, while Sheikh Osama was an "enemy" of Saud.
Bushobama has kept low-level war activity going in those countries, and now adds Libya. All three are economic or religious adversaries of the Saud Dynasty, which leads to the inescapable conclusion that the entire war effort is simply a way to eliminate or weaken enemies of Saud.
Now we have a firm connection at last.
This account leaves one question, though. Clearly Obama decided to do the deed that both Bush and Clinton had explicitly refused. Obama broke through the 'protective shield' and killed Osama, while Bush and Clinton had meekly obeyed the Saudis. Does this amount to a declaration of independence, a clean break between the Bushobama Dynasty and the Saud Dynasty? Or did Saud decide for its own reasons that Sheikh Osama was no longer worth the trouble? ¶ 10:32 AM
Until now, the Saud Dynasty and the Bushobama Dynasty have worked together to conceal this obvious fact, to make it seem that the attack came from Iraq and Afghanistan, while Sheikh Osama was an "enemy" of Saud.
Bushobama has kept low-level war activity going in those countries, and now adds Libya. All three are economic or religious adversaries of the Saud Dynasty, which leads to the inescapable conclusion that the entire war effort is simply a way to eliminate or weaken enemies of Saud.
Now we have a firm connection at last.
Raelynn Hillhouse, an American security analyst, claims [Osama's] whereabouts were finally revealed when a Pakistani intelligence officer came forward to claim the $25m bounty on Osama's head.
Her version ... contradicts the official account that bin Laden was tracked down through his trusted courier.
"The ISI officer came forward to claim the substantial reward and to broker US citizenship for his family," she writes on her intelligence blog, The Spy Who Billed Me.
... The informant claimed that the Saudis were paying off the Pakistani military and intelligence (ISI) to essentially shelter and keep bin Laden under house arrest in Abbottabad...
This account leaves one question, though. Clearly Obama decided to do the deed that both Bush and Clinton had explicitly refused. Obama broke through the 'protective shield' and killed Osama, while Bush and Clinton had meekly obeyed the Saudis. Does this amount to a declaration of independence, a clean break between the Bushobama Dynasty and the Saud Dynasty? Or did Saud decide for its own reasons that Sheikh Osama was no longer worth the trouble? ¶ 10:32 AM
