Wednesday, June 22, 2011
Why did Rezident Bush appoint Thomas?
This is somewhat triggered by previous entry about hard vs soft Communism. Not really new, just something I've been constantly puzzled about.
Rezident Bush The Father was the 'closer' in the sequence of Communist takeover from 1948 to 1988. Nearly all his major actions were consistent with that role:
1. Tried to assassinate Reagan, the last serious anti-Communist. Narrowly and miraculously failed.
2. Ran a useless and consumptive war in Iraq that served only to strengthen the 'enemy' leader. Set up the template for the permawars of Rezident Bush The Son and Rezident Obama.
3. After the Rodney King riot in Los Angeles, insured that black gangsters were officially empowered and any police attempt to stop black gangsters was officially condemned. Standard Leninist procedure to keep normal people confused and weak.
4. ADA created a new privileged Victim Class, encouraging disabled folks to stop working and start serving the Party.
5. Clean Air Act gave the marauding EPA terrorist army all the power it needed to SMASH SMASH SMASH SMASH SMASH American business and agriculture.
6. Appointed Commiefag David Souter to Supreme Court, where he followed Party line perfectly. (We were supposed to believe that Commiefag Souter's leftist record was a 'surprise' to Rezident Bush The Father; that lie was quickly exposed.)
But what about the single exception? What about Clarence Thomas? He's one of the few open heterosexuals in DC, one of the few loyal Americans in DC, and absolutely the solitary unique one and only government official who reads and understands and obeys the Constitution. Nobody else has even read it.
Did Rezident Bush The Father think Thomas was a weak-minded jigaboo who would be easy to blackmail? The business with Commiedyke Anita Hill was obviously an attempt to create a permanent threat, a pubic hair that could be pulled any time Thomas deviated from Party orthodoxy. But it didn't work. Thomas has simply ignored the threat.
Whatever the reason for Bush's error, I thank God for Clarence Thomas and his unwavering quiet moral strength. ¶ 4:02 AM
Rezident Bush The Father was the 'closer' in the sequence of Communist takeover from 1948 to 1988. Nearly all his major actions were consistent with that role:
1. Tried to assassinate Reagan, the last serious anti-Communist. Narrowly and miraculously failed.
2. Ran a useless and consumptive war in Iraq that served only to strengthen the 'enemy' leader. Set up the template for the permawars of Rezident Bush The Son and Rezident Obama.
3. After the Rodney King riot in Los Angeles, insured that black gangsters were officially empowered and any police attempt to stop black gangsters was officially condemned. Standard Leninist procedure to keep normal people confused and weak.
4. ADA created a new privileged Victim Class, encouraging disabled folks to stop working and start serving the Party.
5. Clean Air Act gave the marauding EPA terrorist army all the power it needed to SMASH SMASH SMASH SMASH SMASH American business and agriculture.
6. Appointed Commiefag David Souter to Supreme Court, where he followed Party line perfectly. (We were supposed to believe that Commiefag Souter's leftist record was a 'surprise' to Rezident Bush The Father; that lie was quickly exposed.)
But what about the single exception? What about Clarence Thomas? He's one of the few open heterosexuals in DC, one of the few loyal Americans in DC, and absolutely the solitary unique one and only government official who reads and understands and obeys the Constitution. Nobody else has even read it.
Did Rezident Bush The Father think Thomas was a weak-minded jigaboo who would be easy to blackmail? The business with Commiedyke Anita Hill was obviously an attempt to create a permanent threat, a pubic hair that could be pulled any time Thomas deviated from Party orthodoxy. But it didn't work. Thomas has simply ignored the threat.
Whatever the reason for Bush's error, I thank God for Clarence Thomas and his unwavering quiet moral strength. ¶ 4:02 AM
