Saturday, February 26, 2011
  Coleman's 95 theses

John Coleman, one of the heroes of real science, has written an excellent piece at WUWT. He raises a basic question that doesn't seem to be discussed often.
It appears, as of now, victory, if it were to come, would be on a political level, not a scientific one. Just as “the climate according to Al Gore” has become the Democrat Party mantra, “global warming is not real” has become the rally call of the Republican Party. As a Journalist (I am a member of the television news team at KUSI-TV) I try hard to avoid taking political positions.

So I keep focused on the bad science behind global warming. If my team (There are over 31,000 scientists on my team) can make headway in correcting the science, then I will be happy to let the politics, environmentalism and alternate energy movement fight the policy battles without me.

Which is more effective, correcting the science or altering the political trend?

When I look for a historical answer I'm lost. Since the invention of modern science in the 1600's there has NEVER been a similar situation. There has NEVER been a wild-eyed apocalyptic cult, with fake scientific trappings, that took over almost everything. 90% of churches, 100% of schools and universities, 100% of governments, 200% of Wall Street, but only 85% of media.

There have been thousands of apocalyptic cults, a few leading to suicide for followers, most leading to disappointment and disgust. Until Gaia came along, none of them took over more than a small segment of society, none captured even one national government.

And there have been plenty of Kuhnian cases when scientists held onto an old theory after it was clearly invalid, or rejected a new theory when it was clearly valid. Tectonic plates in geology, the Bernoulli vibration of the larynx, the tuned-piano image of the cochlea: all obviously fit the known facts better than earlier ideas but had to wait for the older generation to die. But none of these had any political effects or political support. They were purely internal disputes within one branch of science.

And there have been a few earlier cases when political forces supported bad science because it helped them to maintain the egalitarian myth, such as Soviet support for Lysenko's inheritance of acquired characteristics, or left-wing support for B.F. Skinner's behaviorism and Margaret Mead's Samoa stories ....

Aha! There's the analogy after all. B.F. Skinner and Margaret Mead were the pet "scientists" of the insane egalitarians who have taken over most** institutions since 1948. When anyone dared to doubt that all humans are identical, they were told to read Mead and Skinner for "scientific" proof.

And what do you know? Margaret Mead also co-founded the Carbon Cult.

Why does this one unimpressive figure stand at the base of two holocausts?

I dunno.

If I had to pick a female of that generation to lead two massive quasi-religious movements, I'd pick this one, not a dumpy slouch like Mead.

To answer the original question, egalitarianism is fading fast in science but not in politics. Biologists no longer feel bound to make ritual obeisance to equality when they find results that show difference. MD psychiatrists appear to have cut loose from the dogma. But legislatures and courts are still roaring forward with Skinner and Mead, still ripping culture and society into primitive Stone-age scraps.

So: in the one relevant example, science corrected first, but the reformed science hasn't slowed the political juggernaut. Does that offer any hope for stopping the Gaian holocaust? Not that I can see.

= = = = =

** Footnote: Egalitarianism never reached anywhere near the universal coverage of Gaia, nor did it have the same religious fervor. Many governments and churches remain uninfected; Wall Street loves Diversity because it's deadly, but even Goldman never figured out a way to securitize Diversity Swaps.
 


<< Home

blogger hit counter
My Photo
Name:
Location: Spokane

The current icon shows Polistra using a Personal Equation Machine.

My graphics products:

Free stuff at ShareCG

And some leftovers here.

ARCHIVES
March 2005 / April 2005 / May 2005 / June 2005 / July 2005 / August 2005 / September 2005 / October 2005 / November 2005 / December 2005 / January 2006 / February 2006 / March 2006 / April 2006 / May 2006 / June 2006 / July 2006 / August 2006 / September 2006 / October 2006 / November 2006 / December 2006 / January 2007 / February 2007 / March 2007 / April 2007 / May 2007 / June 2007 / July 2007 / August 2007 / September 2007 / October 2007 / November 2007 / December 2007 / January 2008 / February 2008 / March 2008 / April 2008 / May 2008 / June 2008 / July 2008 / August 2008 / September 2008 / October 2008 / November 2008 / December 2008 / January 2009 / February 2009 / March 2009 / April 2009 / May 2009 / June 2009 / July 2009 / August 2009 / September 2009 / October 2009 / November 2009 / December 2009 / January 2010 / February 2010 / March 2010 / April 2010 / May 2010 / June 2010 / July 2010 / August 2010 / September 2010 / October 2010 / November 2010 / December 2010 / January 2011 / February 2011 / March 2011 / April 2011 / May 2011 / June 2011 / July 2011 / August 2011 / September 2011 / October 2011 / November 2011 / December 2011 / January 2012 / February 2012 / March 2012 / April 2012 / May 2012 / June 2012 / July 2012 / August 2012 / September 2012 / October 2012 / November 2012 / December 2012 / January 2013 / February 2013 / March 2013 / April 2013 / May 2013 / June 2013 / July 2013 / August 2013 / September 2013 / October 2013 / November 2013 / December 2013 / January 2014 / February 2014 / March 2014 / April 2014 / May 2014 / June 2014 / July 2014 / August 2014 / September 2014 / October 2014 / November 2014 / December 2014 / January 2015 / February 2015 / March 2015 / April 2015 / May 2015 / June 2015 / July 2015 / August 2015 / September 2015 / October 2015 / November 2015 / December 2015 / January 2016 / February 2016 / March 2016 / April 2016 / May 2016 / June 2016 / July 2016 / August 2016 / September 2016 / October 2016 / November 2016 / December 2016 / January 2017 / February 2017 / March 2017 / April 2017 / May 2017 / June 2017 / July 2017 / August 2017 / September 2017 / October 2017 / November 2017 / December 2017 / January 2018 / February 2018 / March 2018 / April 2018 / May 2018 / June 2018 / July 2018 / August 2018 / September 2018 / October 2018 / November 2018 / December 2018 / January 2019 / February 2019 / March 2019 / April 2019 / May 2019 / June 2019 / July 2019 / August 2019 / September 2019 / October 2019 / November 2019 / December 2019 / January 2020 / February 2020 / March 2020 / April 2020 / May 2020 / June 2020 / July 2020 / August 2020 / September 2020 / October 2020 / November 2020 / December 2020 / January 2021 / February 2021 / March 2021 / April 2021 / May 2021 / June 2021 / July 2021 / August 2021 / September 2021 / October 2021 / November 2021 /


Major tags or subjects:

2000 = 1000
Carbon Cult
Carver
Constants and variables
Defensible Cases
Defensible Times
Defensible Spaces
Equipoise
Experiential education
From rights to duties
Grand Blueprint
Metrology
Natural law = Sharia law
Natural law = Soviet law
Shared Lie
Skill-estate
Trinity House
#Whole-of-society

Powered by Blogger