Wednesday, November 17, 2010
Bravo Inhofe, again
James Inhofe, the only legitimate Senator, shows yet again why he owns that title.
As always, Inhofe The Only Senator is both correct and courageous, and I wouldn't count on the "going down" part.
For many years he's been the ONLY honest human being in DC on the "Global Warming" crime. Other members of Congress have voted against cap-n-trade on practical grounds without taking a stand against genocide; only Inhofe has named the crime. This year for the first time, a few of the newcomers are equally clear, which wouldn't have happened without the Luther-like steadiness of Inhofe.
On pork and earmarks, the problem is more subtle. It's not that earmarking is right or wrong as such; it's more that the focus on eliminating pork leaves members with no concrete way to "do business" with their constituents. Without the ability to bring home visible projects and jobs, they must show their loyalty to abstract Party rhetoric.
And that's exactly what the Two Soros Labels want. Loyalty to Wall Street, loyalty to meaningless talking points, unquestioning loyalty to the vast and suicidal projects of the Empire, but no loyalty or connection to the states and people.
= = = = =
"Total loyalty is possible only when fidelity is emptied of all concrete content, from which changes of mind might naturally arise." --- Hannah Arendt ¶ 6:12 AM
Oklahoma Sen. Jim Inhofe is going down swinging, insisting he’ll still send earmarks to his state even though his fellow Senate Republicans are poised to adopt a two-year ban on pet projects.
"I'm going to look out for my state of Oklahoma," Inhofe told POLITICO. "Obviously, that's what the Constitution says I’m going to do, and I'm going to do it. Let's keep in mind this is over. I'll be the last conservative standing."
As always, Inhofe The Only Senator is both correct and courageous, and I wouldn't count on the "going down" part.
For many years he's been the ONLY honest human being in DC on the "Global Warming" crime. Other members of Congress have voted against cap-n-trade on practical grounds without taking a stand against genocide; only Inhofe has named the crime. This year for the first time, a few of the newcomers are equally clear, which wouldn't have happened without the Luther-like steadiness of Inhofe.
On pork and earmarks, the problem is more subtle. It's not that earmarking is right or wrong as such; it's more that the focus on eliminating pork leaves members with no concrete way to "do business" with their constituents. Without the ability to bring home visible projects and jobs, they must show their loyalty to abstract Party rhetoric.
And that's exactly what the Two Soros Labels want. Loyalty to Wall Street, loyalty to meaningless talking points, unquestioning loyalty to the vast and suicidal projects of the Empire, but no loyalty or connection to the states and people.
= = = = =
"Total loyalty is possible only when fidelity is emptied of all concrete content, from which changes of mind might naturally arise." --- Hannah Arendt ¶ 6:12 AM
