"Something backward"
Excellent point by
Denis Boyles at NRO.
"Science that devotes billions to predicting weather badly, while not predicting massive earthquakes at all, seems to have something backward."
Yup. Especially when the "science" actually predicts weather
backward, not just badly. The "scientists" have us spending trillions of dollars supposedly to cool the earth off, while the earth is already cooling faster than we can handle.
Earthquake prediction shouldn't be all that hard. Quakes are unquestionably preceded by a detectable phenomenon. Many birds and mammals sense it; some humans sense it. As
mentioned before, I was able to sense quakes about 18 hours before they popped during Spokane's swarm of minor quakes in 2001, and others reported the same feeling.
This predictive feeling can't be mysterious or spiritual; it must be responding to a physically measurable change, probably a distortion of the earth's magnetic field. (Coincidentally or not, a change in magnetic field is also the main driver of cooling and warming.)
Trouble is, American "scientists" will never never never touch the whole subject because it (1) requires trusting human observations and (2) vaguely suggests a connection to the world of religion. An American "scientist" only trusts computer models running on guaranteed false data made up by other computer models. Observed data,
especially data observed by humans, is absolutely forbidden. And an American "scientist" has one purpose in life: to EXTERMINATE EXTERMINATE EXTERMINATE EXTERMINATE anything that has the slightest taste of religion.
Chinese and Russian scientists have been studying these organic measurements for quite a while, because they
aren't violent murderous anti-human bigots; they are willing to examine natural phenomena that might help to
save lives.