Thursday, March 15, 2007
Non-binding
Professor Polistra has run the experiments and checked the theories.
Her conclusion:
A non-binding resolution is the perfect response to a non-binding war.
If we were fighting a binding war, a war aimed at defeating our enemies forever and killing their blood fetish forever, we'd already be done.
The internal discontent that allows the D politicians to play these games wouldn't exist. The anti-American protesters would be marginalized because most Americans would feel the infinite relief of total victory. The major anti-American leaders and politicians would be in jail for sedition or hanged for treason.
That's how Roosevelt and Churchill fought. Destroy the enemy, silence the traitors. A binding war, with no loopholes or escape clauses. Their enemy has remained dead for 60 years, though its mindset has pollinated today's Arab fascists. ¶ 9:23 PM
Professor Polistra has run the experiments and checked the theories.
Her conclusion:
A non-binding resolution is the perfect response to a non-binding war.
If we were fighting a binding war, a war aimed at defeating our enemies forever and killing their blood fetish forever, we'd already be done.
The internal discontent that allows the D politicians to play these games wouldn't exist. The anti-American protesters would be marginalized because most Americans would feel the infinite relief of total victory. The major anti-American leaders and politicians would be in jail for sedition or hanged for treason.
That's how Roosevelt and Churchill fought. Destroy the enemy, silence the traitors. A binding war, with no loopholes or escape clauses. Their enemy has remained dead for 60 years, though its mindset has pollinated today's Arab fascists. ¶ 9:23 PM
