Charter for self-defense, reprinted
The silly organization 'Common Good' has put out a silly manifesto
for 'reform'. Some nice principles but nothing that can possibly turn into action.
Here's a silly manifesto I wrote two years ago.
I don't see anything that I'd want to revise now. It's just as pointless as Common Good's manifesto, but it starts from a more biological and experiential baseline.
= = = = = START SILLY REPRINT:
Let's put together a broad set of equivalences, starting with the idea that Natural Law is meant to provide an INHIBITORY response or NEGATIVE FEEDBACK for Deplorables against Insatiables.
How do you get from order to chaos and death? Positive feedback. Exponential functions. Wanting everything.
How do you restore and maintain order and life? Negative feedback. Tanh functions. Wanting something.
Positive feedback people = Insatiables.
Negative feedback people = Deplorables.
In a HEALTHY organism or culture both forces are always present. The Sorosian side of the world is no longer healthy or survivable because the inhibitory side has been eliminated and outlawed.
Natural Law is explicitly about strengthening NF and suppressing PF. Sharia does it
smartly by harnessing the PF people to serve the NF people and vice versa.
The Parkinsonian agency or NGO, the 'War On', is the classic excitatory input, self-generating positive feedback. Make a problem, justify more budget, use more budget to make more problems.
What's the opposite, the inhibitory side?
= = = = =
The opposite of WarOn is SELF-DEFENSE at all levels, physical and commercial and informational. SELF-DEFENSE is the organizational equivalent of inhibitory synapses and negative feedback.
A charter for self-defense would include these items:
1. You should be free to own and use physical weapons and walls to defend your PROPERTY and BODY
against ordinary criminals.
2. You should be free to own and use cyberweapons and cyberwalls and pre-Disney copyrights to defend your INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
from thieves and monopolies and governments.
3. You should be able to defend your CAPITAL and BUSINESS
against monopolies and hostile takeovers and aggressive lawsuits and arbitrary confiscation.
4. You should be able to defend your SKILL
against skill-thieves like schools and universities and innovative disrupters like Uber.
5. Cities should be able to defend their SOVEREIGNTY
against black-robed demons, and to defend their people against forcible invasions of migrants and criminals by higher levels of government.
6. Governments and common carriers should not be allowed to eliminate INFORMATION needed for self-defense.
= = = = =
Only (1) corresponds to a currently active law. The others would be new.
I've been discussing (2) through (5) for years. I haven't gotten to (6) until just now.
(6) is needed to protect leakers like Wikileaks and soros.dcleaks.com. The latter has already been silenced. (6) would also protect policemen or writers who attempt to WARN their local populations about migrant invasions and unsafe areas. This is a big problem in EU, and I'm sure it will be coming to USA STRONG in the next few milliseconds. Evil accelerates exponentially when Soros is in control.
= = = = =
**Semantic sidenote: It's revealing that Insatiables OFTEN use the word negative when describing Deplorables. Insatiables see Deps as antimatter, Negative Externalities, obstacles to the infinite infinite infinite power that is the natural possession of the Insatiable.
= = = = = END SILLY REPRINT.
Labels: Natural law = Sharia law, Natural law = Soviet law, skill-estate